Effective enablers and tools for inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition in public policymaking organizations: a Delphi study in GCC countries

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1108/vjikms-01-2023-0001
Maryam AlQasmi, K. Al-Busaidi
{"title":"Effective enablers and tools for inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition in public policymaking organizations: a Delphi study in GCC countries","authors":"Maryam AlQasmi, K. Al-Busaidi","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-01-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the most effective enablers and tools for inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition in public policymaking organizations.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBased on a literature review, the study summarized 51 individual, organizational, technological and inhabitant-related enablers of inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition, as well as 36 technological and social tools. The study assessed the effectiveness of these enablers and tools based on two rounds of a Delphi study targeting 31 policymakers in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was assessed to determine consensus among participating policymakers.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicate that the most effective enablers were inhabitants’ willingness to get involved, information technology (IT) infrastructure, IT staff support and inhabitants’ trust in policymakers. Additionally, the study found that the most effective tools for inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition included meetings, interviews, social media and field visits.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nInhabitants’ knowledge acquisition is an important social and economic force that will drive change in any society by enabling the implementation of innovative ideas and practices. A review of the relevant research shows that despite the usability of inhabitants’ knowledge, the degree to which inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition is integrated into the public policymaking system remains unclear. This study of inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition from the policymaker perspective provides a better understanding of the inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition process in policymaking organizations.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-01-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the most effective enablers and tools for inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition in public policymaking organizations. Design/methodology/approach Based on a literature review, the study summarized 51 individual, organizational, technological and inhabitant-related enablers of inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition, as well as 36 technological and social tools. The study assessed the effectiveness of these enablers and tools based on two rounds of a Delphi study targeting 31 policymakers in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was assessed to determine consensus among participating policymakers. Findings The findings indicate that the most effective enablers were inhabitants’ willingness to get involved, information technology (IT) infrastructure, IT staff support and inhabitants’ trust in policymakers. Additionally, the study found that the most effective tools for inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition included meetings, interviews, social media and field visits. Originality/value Inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition is an important social and economic force that will drive change in any society by enabling the implementation of innovative ideas and practices. A review of the relevant research shows that despite the usability of inhabitants’ knowledge, the degree to which inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition is integrated into the public policymaking system remains unclear. This study of inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition from the policymaker perspective provides a better understanding of the inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition process in policymaking organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共决策组织中居民获取知识的有效促进因素和工具:海湾合作委员会国家的德尔菲研究
本研究旨在调查公共决策组织中最有效的居民知识获取促进因素和工具。在文献综述的基础上,本研究总结了 51 种与居民知识获取相关的个人、组织、技术和居民促进因素,以及 36 种技术和社会工具。研究根据两轮针对海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家 31 名政策制定者的德尔菲研究,对这些促进因素和工具的有效性进行了评估。研究结果表明,最有效的促进因素是居民的参与意愿、信息技术 (IT) 基础设施、信息技术人员的支持以及居民对决策者的信任。此外,研究还发现,居民获取知识的最有效工具包括会议、访谈、社交媒体和实地考察。原创性/价值居民获取知识是一种重要的社会和经济力量,它将通过推动创新理念和实践的实施来推动任何社会的变革。对相关研究的回顾表明,尽管居民的知识具有可用性,但居民的知识获取在多大程度上被纳入公共决策体系仍不明确。这项从政策制定者角度对居民知识获取的研究,有助于更好地理解政策制定组织中的居民知识获取过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
The impact of dual alliance on firm green innovation: a moderated mediation effect model The influence of business analytics on supply chain ambidexterity: the mediating role of market learning Effective enablers and tools for inhabitants’ knowledge acquisition in public policymaking organizations: a Delphi study in GCC countries Accounting going digital: a Vietnamese experimental study on artificial intelligence in accounting The mediating role of knowledge management processes on the relationship between knowledge-based HRM practices and open innovation in SMEs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1