Prevalence and Species Distribution of Neonatal Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.3390/diseases12070154
Amr Molla, M. Albadrani
{"title":"Prevalence and Species Distribution of Neonatal Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Amr Molla, M. Albadrani","doi":"10.3390/diseases12070154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim: Candida infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) globally. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to investigate the prevalence of candida among causative organisms of neonatal sepsis and identify the distribution of candida species infecting Saudi neonates. Methods: We comprehensively searched Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from their inception till November 2023. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, we ultimately included 21 eligible studies. The designs of the included studies were randomized clinical trials, cohorts, case–control, and case reports; the methodological quality was appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, NIH tool for observational studies, and Murad tool for assessing case reports. Results: Our systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data reported in 21 studies in the Saudi populations, which provided data on different types of candidal infections in 2346 neonates. The pooled data of ten retrospective studies enrolling 1823 neonates revealed that candida species resembled 4.2% of the causative organisms of neonatal sepsis among Saudi neonates (95%CI [2.5%; 5.9%], p = 0.000). Additionally, out of a total of 402 candida species that were identified among the included studies, C. albicans prevailed mostly among Saudi neonates, followed by C. parapsilosis, NS candida, and C. tropicalis (50.25%, 21.40%, 12.44%, and 9.45%, respectively). Conclusions: We found that candida species prevailed in 4.2% of 1823 cases of neonatal sepsis; the most common candida species was C. albicans. We could not pool data regarding risk factors or susceptibility of candida species to different treatment modalities due to insufficient data, requiring future large-scale, high-quality studies to be conducted.","PeriodicalId":11200,"journal":{"name":"Diseases","volume":"46 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Candida infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) globally. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to investigate the prevalence of candida among causative organisms of neonatal sepsis and identify the distribution of candida species infecting Saudi neonates. Methods: We comprehensively searched Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from their inception till November 2023. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, we ultimately included 21 eligible studies. The designs of the included studies were randomized clinical trials, cohorts, case–control, and case reports; the methodological quality was appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, NIH tool for observational studies, and Murad tool for assessing case reports. Results: Our systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data reported in 21 studies in the Saudi populations, which provided data on different types of candidal infections in 2346 neonates. The pooled data of ten retrospective studies enrolling 1823 neonates revealed that candida species resembled 4.2% of the causative organisms of neonatal sepsis among Saudi neonates (95%CI [2.5%; 5.9%], p = 0.000). Additionally, out of a total of 402 candida species that were identified among the included studies, C. albicans prevailed mostly among Saudi neonates, followed by C. parapsilosis, NS candida, and C. tropicalis (50.25%, 21.40%, 12.44%, and 9.45%, respectively). Conclusions: We found that candida species prevailed in 4.2% of 1823 cases of neonatal sepsis; the most common candida species was C. albicans. We could not pool data regarding risk factors or susceptibility of candida species to different treatment modalities due to insufficient data, requiring future large-scale, high-quality studies to be conducted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿念珠菌病的患病率和菌种分布:系统回顾与元分析
背景和目的:念珠菌感染是全球新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)发病和死亡的重要原因。我们旨在开展一项系统性研究,调查新生儿败血症致病菌中念珠菌的流行情况,并确定沙特新生儿感染的念珠菌种类分布。研究方法我们全面检索了 Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 从开始到 2023 年 11 月的资料。在筛选了标题、摘要和全文后,我们最终纳入了 21 项符合条件的研究。纳入研究的设计包括随机临床试验、队列、病例对照和病例报告;方法学质量采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具、NIH 观察性研究工具和 Murad 病例报告评估工具进行评估。结果我们的系统综述和荟萃分析汇集了沙特人群中 21 项研究的数据,这些研究提供了 2346 名新生儿不同类型念珠菌感染的数据。十项回顾性研究的汇总数据显示,在沙特新生儿败血症的致病菌中,念珠菌占 4.2%(95%CI [2.5%; 5.9%],P = 0.000)。此外,在纳入研究的总共 402 种念珠菌中,白念珠菌在沙特新生儿中占多数,其次是副丝状念珠菌、NS 念珠菌和热带念珠菌(分别占 50.25%、21.40%、12.44% 和 9.45%)。结论我们发现,在 1823 例新生儿败血症中,4.2% 的病例感染了念珠菌;最常见的念珠菌是白念珠菌。由于数据不足,我们无法汇集有关风险因素或念珠菌对不同治疗方式的易感性的数据,因此需要今后开展大规模、高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Onset and Disease Activity: To Eradicate or Not to Eradicate? Unveiling the Immunostimulatory Potential of Rhus Toxicodendron in Immunocompromised Balb/C Mice Induced with Cyclophosphamide Could Ocular Glands Be Infected by SARS-CoV-2? Sudden Cardiac Death-Etiology, Risk Factors and Demographic Characteristics: An Extensive Study of 1618 Forensic Autopsies Paediatric Calcaneal Osteochondroma: A Case Report and a Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1