An Alternative Non-Invasive Screening Model for Liver Fibrosis among US Adults at Risk of MASLD

Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.3390/diseases12070150
Hongbing Sun
{"title":"An Alternative Non-Invasive Screening Model for Liver Fibrosis among US Adults at Risk of MASLD","authors":"Hongbing Sun","doi":"10.3390/diseases12070150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Screening for liver fibrosis presents a clinical challenge. This study aimed to explore a useful alternative method for assessing fibrosis risk among US adults at risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods: A liver stiffness score (LSS) model was proposed and tested using data from 3976 participants at possible risk of MASLD, obtained from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Results: The LSS model was developed using liver stiffness measurements, blood biochemistry, and body measurement data from 2414 NHANES participants at risk of MASLD, sampled between 2017 and 2020: LSS = exp(0.007035 × bodyweightkg − 0.1061 × raceblack1,0 + 0.183221 × diabetes1,0 + 0.008539 × ASTIU/L − 0.0018 × plateletcount1000cell/UL − 0.21011 × albuming/dL + 2.259087). The probability (P) of having fibrosis F3 + F4 is calculated as follows: P = 0.0091 × LSS2 − 0.0791 × LSS + 0.1933. The developed LSS model was tested on 1562 at-risk participants from the 2017–2018 cycle. The results showed that the LSS model achieved AUROC values of 0.79 and 0.78 for diagnosing cirrhosis (F4) and advanced fibrosis (F3 + F4) in the US population, respectively. It outperformed existing models such as NFS, FIB-4, SAFE, and FIB-3. For screening F3 + F4 fibrosis, the LSS model’s top decile outperformed the NFS and FIB-4 models by 37.7% and 42.6%, respectively. Additionally, it showed superior performance compared to the waist circumference classification method by 29.5%. Conclusions: derived from an ethnically diverse population dataset, the LSS screening model, along with its probability equation, may offer clinicians a valuable alternative method for assessing the risk of liver fibrosis in the at-risk adult population.","PeriodicalId":11200,"journal":{"name":"Diseases","volume":"113 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Screening for liver fibrosis presents a clinical challenge. This study aimed to explore a useful alternative method for assessing fibrosis risk among US adults at risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods: A liver stiffness score (LSS) model was proposed and tested using data from 3976 participants at possible risk of MASLD, obtained from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Results: The LSS model was developed using liver stiffness measurements, blood biochemistry, and body measurement data from 2414 NHANES participants at risk of MASLD, sampled between 2017 and 2020: LSS = exp(0.007035 × bodyweightkg − 0.1061 × raceblack1,0 + 0.183221 × diabetes1,0 + 0.008539 × ASTIU/L − 0.0018 × plateletcount1000cell/UL − 0.21011 × albuming/dL + 2.259087). The probability (P) of having fibrosis F3 + F4 is calculated as follows: P = 0.0091 × LSS2 − 0.0791 × LSS + 0.1933. The developed LSS model was tested on 1562 at-risk participants from the 2017–2018 cycle. The results showed that the LSS model achieved AUROC values of 0.79 and 0.78 for diagnosing cirrhosis (F4) and advanced fibrosis (F3 + F4) in the US population, respectively. It outperformed existing models such as NFS, FIB-4, SAFE, and FIB-3. For screening F3 + F4 fibrosis, the LSS model’s top decile outperformed the NFS and FIB-4 models by 37.7% and 42.6%, respectively. Additionally, it showed superior performance compared to the waist circumference classification method by 29.5%. Conclusions: derived from an ethnically diverse population dataset, the LSS screening model, along with its probability equation, may offer clinicians a valuable alternative method for assessing the risk of liver fibrosis in the at-risk adult population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有 MASLD 风险的美国成年人中开展肝纤维化非侵入性筛查的替代模式
背景和目的:肝纤维化筛查是一项临床挑战。本研究旨在探索一种有用的替代方法,用于评估有代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MASLD)风险的美国成年人的肝纤维化风险。方法:从美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)中获得了 3976 名可能有 MASLD 风险的参与者的数据,提出并测试了肝僵化评分(LSS)模型。结果:LSS 模型是利用 2017 年至 2020 年间采样的 2414 名有 MASLD 风险的 NHANES 参与者的肝脏硬度测量、血液生化和身体测量数据建立的:LSS = exp(0.007035 × bodyweightkg - 0.1061 × raceblack1,0 + 0.183221 × diabetes1,0 + 0.008539 × ASTIU/L - 0.0018 × plateletcount1000cell/UL - 0.21011 × albuming/dL + 2.259087)。纤维化 F3 + F4 的概率(P)计算如下:P = 0.0091 × LSS2 - 0.0791 × LSS + 0.1933。开发的 LSS 模型在 2017-2018 年周期的 1562 名高危参与者身上进行了测试。结果显示,LSS 模型在美国人群中诊断肝硬化(F4)和晚期纤维化(F3 + F4)的 AUROC 值分别达到 0.79 和 0.78。它的表现优于现有的模型,如 NFS、FIB-4、SAFE 和 FIB-3。在筛查 F3 + F4 纤维化方面,LSS 模型的最高十分位数分别比 NFS 和 FIB-4 模型高出 37.7% 和 42.6%。此外,与腰围分类法相比,LSS 模型的性能优越 29.5%。结论:LSS筛查模型及其概率方程来源于不同种族的人群数据集,可为临床医生评估高危成年人群的肝纤维化风险提供一种有价值的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Onset and Disease Activity: To Eradicate or Not to Eradicate? Unveiling the Immunostimulatory Potential of Rhus Toxicodendron in Immunocompromised Balb/C Mice Induced with Cyclophosphamide Could Ocular Glands Be Infected by SARS-CoV-2? Sudden Cardiac Death-Etiology, Risk Factors and Demographic Characteristics: An Extensive Study of 1618 Forensic Autopsies Paediatric Calcaneal Osteochondroma: A Case Report and a Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1