Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy on Detectable Prostate Bed Recurrence after Prostatectomy in RT-Naïve Patients

Life Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.3390/life14070870
Riccardo Santamaria, M. Zaffaroni, M. Vincini, Lorenzo Colombi, A. Gaeta, F. Mastroleo, G. Corrao, D. Zerini, Riccardo Villa, G. Mazzola, S. Alessi, S. Luzzago, F. Mistretta, G. Musi, O. de Cobelli, S. Gandini, Lukasz Kuncman, F. Cattani, Francesco Ceci, G. Petralia, G. Marvaso, B. Jereczek-Fossa
{"title":"Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy on Detectable Prostate Bed Recurrence after Prostatectomy in RT-Naïve Patients","authors":"Riccardo Santamaria, M. Zaffaroni, M. Vincini, Lorenzo Colombi, A. Gaeta, F. Mastroleo, G. Corrao, D. Zerini, Riccardo Villa, G. Mazzola, S. Alessi, S. Luzzago, F. Mistretta, G. Musi, O. de Cobelli, S. Gandini, Lukasz Kuncman, F. Cattani, Francesco Ceci, G. Petralia, G. Marvaso, B. Jereczek-Fossa","doi":"10.3390/life14070870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose or Objective—The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT on detectable prostate bed recurrence in RT-naïve prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods: Eighty-six patients who underwent SBRT for macroscopic bed recurrence after prostatectomy were retrospectively included. Patients were treated based on mpMRI or choline/PSMA PET. Results: The median time to biochemical relapse (BCR) after RP was 46 months, with a median PSA at restaging of 1.04 ng/mL. Forty-six patients were staged with mpMRI and choline/PSMA PET, while ten and thirty were treated based on PET and MRI only, respectively. Only one late G ≥ 2 GI toxicity was observed. With a median BCR follow-up of 14 months, twenty-nine patients experienced a BCR with a median PSA at recurrence of 1.66 ng/mL and a median survival free from the event of 40.1 months. The median time to BCR was 17.9 months. Twenty-seven patients had clinical relapse (CR), with a median CR follow-up of 16.27 months and a median time to CR of 23.0 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 88% and 66%, respectively, while clinical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 92% and 82%, respectively. Regarding local relapses, seven were in the field of treatment, while eight of them were outside the field of treatment. Conclusions: Data showed that SBRT targeting only the macroscopic bed recurrence instead of the whole prostate bed is safe and effective. Additional data and longer follow-ups will provide a clearer indication of the appropriate treatment and staging methodology for these patients.","PeriodicalId":18182,"journal":{"name":"Life","volume":"110 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14070870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose or Objective—The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT on detectable prostate bed recurrence in RT-naïve prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods: Eighty-six patients who underwent SBRT for macroscopic bed recurrence after prostatectomy were retrospectively included. Patients were treated based on mpMRI or choline/PSMA PET. Results: The median time to biochemical relapse (BCR) after RP was 46 months, with a median PSA at restaging of 1.04 ng/mL. Forty-six patients were staged with mpMRI and choline/PSMA PET, while ten and thirty were treated based on PET and MRI only, respectively. Only one late G ≥ 2 GI toxicity was observed. With a median BCR follow-up of 14 months, twenty-nine patients experienced a BCR with a median PSA at recurrence of 1.66 ng/mL and a median survival free from the event of 40.1 months. The median time to BCR was 17.9 months. Twenty-seven patients had clinical relapse (CR), with a median CR follow-up of 16.27 months and a median time to CR of 23.0 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 88% and 66%, respectively, while clinical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 92% and 82%, respectively. Regarding local relapses, seven were in the field of treatment, while eight of them were outside the field of treatment. Conclusions: Data showed that SBRT targeting only the macroscopic bed recurrence instead of the whole prostate bed is safe and effective. Additional data and longer follow-ups will provide a clearer indication of the appropriate treatment and staging methodology for these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图像引导立体定向体外放射治疗对 RT 免疫患者前列腺切除术后可检测到的前列腺床复发的影响
目的:本研究旨在评估SBRT对RT无效的前列腺癌患者可检测到的前列腺床复发的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:回顾性纳入了86例在前列腺切除术后因大面积病床复发而接受SBRT治疗的患者。根据 mpMRI 或胆碱/PSMA PET 对患者进行治疗。结果显示RP术后生化复发(BCR)的中位时间为46个月,重新分期时的PSA中位数为1.04纳克/毫升。46名患者通过mpMRI和胆碱/PSMA PET进行了分期,10名和30名患者仅根据PET和MRI进行了治疗。仅观察到一名晚期 G≥2 消化道毒性患者。中位BCR随访时间为14个月,其中29名患者经历了BCR,复发时中位PSA为1.66纳克/毫升,中位生存期为40.1个月。中位BCR时间为17.9个月。27名患者临床复发(CR),中位CR随访时间为16.27个月,中位CR时间为23.0个月。一年和两年的无生化复发生存率分别为88%和66%,一年和两年的无临床复发生存率分别为92%和82%。至于局部复发,7 例在治疗范围内,8 例在治疗范围外。结论数据显示,只针对大面积复发而非整个前列腺床的 SBRT 是安全有效的。更多的数据和更长时间的随访将为这些患者提供更明确的适当治疗和分期方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personalized Management of Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Vitreoretinopathy Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation in Preterm Infants: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Recent Update on Pathophysiology and Treatment Effect of FluoRoquinolones on Aortic Growth, aortic stIffness and wave refLEctionS (FRAGILES study) Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Predict the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1