Post-Growth Ambitions and Growth-Based Realities in Sustainable Land-Use Planning

IF 1.7 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.17645/up.7881
C. Lamker, Thomas Terfrüchte
{"title":"Post-Growth Ambitions and Growth-Based Realities in Sustainable Land-Use Planning","authors":"C. Lamker, Thomas Terfrüchte","doi":"10.17645/up.7881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governments have developed, agreed, and often embraced ambitious targets to meet sustainability and climate change demands. The use of land is foundational for long-term success and one of the most crucial resources where absolute limits of development become tangible. In Europe, success in stopping the expansion of settlement uses through building on natural or agricultural land remains limited in scope and speed. While planning instruments could be open for versatile uses, a pro-growth pathway continues at all planning scales. The premise of this article is that growth fixation is inscribed in planning instruments. We build on post-growth planning literature to conceptualize the relevance of (post-)growth for land-use planning. Two examples of planning instruments (modelling regional land use needs, density concepts) and their application in German case studies illustrate wherein growth has been locked and within which potentials for change lie. We investigate inscribed premises of the causal relation between population and household growth to land consumption that are leading to a divergence between the need for land and the provision of land. By doing so, we position post-growth planning to understand contemporary challenges in reducing the net consumption of land, and as a crucial body of thought that better accounts for the tangible limits of available land.","PeriodicalId":51735,"journal":{"name":"Urban Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Governments have developed, agreed, and often embraced ambitious targets to meet sustainability and climate change demands. The use of land is foundational for long-term success and one of the most crucial resources where absolute limits of development become tangible. In Europe, success in stopping the expansion of settlement uses through building on natural or agricultural land remains limited in scope and speed. While planning instruments could be open for versatile uses, a pro-growth pathway continues at all planning scales. The premise of this article is that growth fixation is inscribed in planning instruments. We build on post-growth planning literature to conceptualize the relevance of (post-)growth for land-use planning. Two examples of planning instruments (modelling regional land use needs, density concepts) and their application in German case studies illustrate wherein growth has been locked and within which potentials for change lie. We investigate inscribed premises of the causal relation between population and household growth to land consumption that are leading to a divergence between the need for land and the provision of land. By doing so, we position post-growth planning to understand contemporary challenges in reducing the net consumption of land, and as a crucial body of thought that better accounts for the tangible limits of available land.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续土地利用规划中的后增长雄心与基于增长的现实
各国政府已经制定、商定并经常接受雄心勃勃的目标,以满足可持续性和气候变化的要求。土地的使用是长期成功的基础,也是最关键的资源之一,在这里,发展的绝对限制变得有形。在欧洲,通过在自然或农业用地上进行建设来阻止居住用途扩张的成功案例在范围和速度上仍然有限。虽然规划手段可以向多功能用途开放,但在所有规划尺度上,支持增长的道路仍在继续。这篇文章的前提是,增长固定化已被刻画在规划工具中。我们以 "后增长 "规划文献为基础,将(后)增长与土地利用规划的相关性概念化。两个规划工具(地区土地使用需求建模、密度概念)及其在德国案例研究中的应用实例说明了增长被锁定的位置以及变革的潜力所在。我们研究了人口和家庭增长与土地消耗之间因果关系的内在前提,这种因果关系导致了土地需求与土地供应之间的分歧。通过这样做,我们将 "后增长规划 "定位为理解当代在减少土地净消耗方面所面临的挑战,并将其作为一种重要的思想体系,以更好地解释可用土地的实际限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Planning
Urban Planning URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Urban Planning is a new international peer-reviewed open access journal of urban studies aimed at advancing understandings and ideas of humankind’s habitats – villages, towns, cities, megacities – in order to promote progress and quality of life. The journal brings urban science and urban planning together with other cross-disciplinary fields such as sociology, ecology, psychology, technology, politics, philosophy, geography, environmental science, economics, maths and computer science, to understand processes influencing urban forms and structures, their relations with environment and life quality, with the final aim to identify patterns towards progress and quality of life.
期刊最新文献
Participatory Climate Action: Reflections on Community Diversity and the Role of External Experts Urban Shrinkage, Degrowth, and Sustainability: An Updated Research Agenda Post-Growth Ambitions and Growth-Based Realities in Sustainable Land-Use Planning Captured by Political Power: More-Than-Neoliberal Urban Development and Planning in Post-Socialist Hungary The Shrinking City as a Testing Ground for Urban Degrowth Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1