Relevance of the TAS’/PASP Ratio as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with a Reduced Ejection Fraction

Life Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.3390/life14070863
I. Srdanović, M. Stefanovic, A. Milovančev, A. Vulin, T. Pantić, D. Dabović, S. Tadic, A. Ilić, Anastazija Stojšić Milosavljević, M. Bjelobrk, T. Miljković, L. Velicki
{"title":"Relevance of the TAS’/PASP Ratio as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with a Reduced Ejection Fraction","authors":"I. Srdanović, M. Stefanovic, A. Milovančev, A. Vulin, T. Pantić, D. Dabović, S. Tadic, A. Ilić, Anastazija Stojšić Milosavljević, M. Bjelobrk, T. Miljković, L. Velicki","doi":"10.3390/life14070863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is evidence that right ventricular (RV) contractile function, especially its coupling with the pulmonary circulation, has an important prognostic value in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Aims: This study aimed to identify the best echocardiographic parameters of RV function and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) alone or in the form of the index of right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PA coupling) to determine the best predictor of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which were defined as cardiovascular death and cardiac decompensation in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: The study enrolled 191 HFrEF patients (mean age 62.28 ± 12.79 years, 74% males, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 25.53 ± 6.87%). All patients underwent clinical, laboratory, and transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation, focusing on assessing RV function and non-invasive parameters of RV-PA coupling. RV function was evaluated using fractional area change (FAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and peak tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TAS’). PASP was estimated by peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRVmax) and corrected by assumed right atrial pressure relative to the dimension and collapsibility of the inferior vena cava. The TAPSE/PASP and TAS’/PASP ratios were taken as an index of RV-PA coupling. During the follow-up (mean period of 340 ± 84 days), 58.1% of patients met the composite endpoint. The independent predictors of one-year outcome were shown to be advanced age, atrial fibrillation, indexed left atrial systolic volume (LAVI), LVEF, TAPSE/PASP, and TAS’/PASP. TAS’/PASP emerged as the strongest independent predictor of prognosis, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (0.531–0.840), p < 0.001. Reconstructing the ROC curve 0.8 (0.723–0.859), p < 0.001, we obtained a threshold value of TAS’/PASP ≤ 0.19 (cm/s/mm Hg) (sensitivity 74.0, specificity 75.2). Patients with TAS’/RVSP ≤ 0.19 have a worse prognosis (Log Rank p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirmed previously known independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with HfrEF—advanced age, atrial fibrillation, LAVI, and LVEF—but non-invasive parameters of RV-PA coupling TAPSE/PASP and TAS’/PASP improved risk stratification in patients with HFrEF. Variable TAS’/PASP has been shown to be the most powerful, independent predictor of one-year outcome.","PeriodicalId":18182,"journal":{"name":"Life","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14070863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that right ventricular (RV) contractile function, especially its coupling with the pulmonary circulation, has an important prognostic value in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Aims: This study aimed to identify the best echocardiographic parameters of RV function and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) alone or in the form of the index of right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PA coupling) to determine the best predictor of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which were defined as cardiovascular death and cardiac decompensation in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: The study enrolled 191 HFrEF patients (mean age 62.28 ± 12.79 years, 74% males, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 25.53 ± 6.87%). All patients underwent clinical, laboratory, and transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation, focusing on assessing RV function and non-invasive parameters of RV-PA coupling. RV function was evaluated using fractional area change (FAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and peak tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TAS’). PASP was estimated by peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRVmax) and corrected by assumed right atrial pressure relative to the dimension and collapsibility of the inferior vena cava. The TAPSE/PASP and TAS’/PASP ratios were taken as an index of RV-PA coupling. During the follow-up (mean period of 340 ± 84 days), 58.1% of patients met the composite endpoint. The independent predictors of one-year outcome were shown to be advanced age, atrial fibrillation, indexed left atrial systolic volume (LAVI), LVEF, TAPSE/PASP, and TAS’/PASP. TAS’/PASP emerged as the strongest independent predictor of prognosis, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (0.531–0.840), p < 0.001. Reconstructing the ROC curve 0.8 (0.723–0.859), p < 0.001, we obtained a threshold value of TAS’/PASP ≤ 0.19 (cm/s/mm Hg) (sensitivity 74.0, specificity 75.2). Patients with TAS’/RVSP ≤ 0.19 have a worse prognosis (Log Rank p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirmed previously known independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with HfrEF—advanced age, atrial fibrillation, LAVI, and LVEF—but non-invasive parameters of RV-PA coupling TAPSE/PASP and TAS’/PASP improved risk stratification in patients with HFrEF. Variable TAS’/PASP has been shown to be the most powerful, independent predictor of one-year outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者预后的 TAS'/PASP 比率的相关性
背景:有证据表明,右心室(RV)收缩功能,尤其是其与肺循环的耦合,对左心室功能障碍患者的预后具有重要价值。目的:本研究旨在确定单独或以右心室-肺动脉耦合指数(RV-PA 耦合)形式表示的 RV 功能和肺动脉收缩压(PASP)的最佳超声心动图参数,以确定 1 年主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的最佳预测指标,主要不良心血管事件定义为射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者(HFrEF)的心血管死亡和心脏失代偿。方法与结果研究共招募了 191 名 HFrEF 患者(平均年龄为 62.28 ± 12.79 岁,74% 为男性,平均左室射血分数(LVEF)为 25.53 ± 6.87%)。所有患者都接受了临床、实验室和经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估,重点是评估 RV 功能和 RV-PA 耦合的无创参数。通过分数面积变化(FAC)、三尖瓣环平面收缩偏移(TAPSE)和三尖瓣环收缩速度峰值(TAS')评估 RV 功能。PASP 根据三尖瓣反流峰值速度(TRVmax)估算,并根据假定的右心房压力与下腔静脉的尺寸和塌陷度进行校正。TAPSE/PASP和TAS'/PASP比率被作为RV-PA耦合的指标。在随访期间(平均 340 ± 84 天),58.1% 的患者达到了综合终点。高龄、心房颤动、左心房收缩容积指数(LAVI)、LVEF、TAPSE/PASP 和 TAS'/PASP 均可独立预测一年后的结果。TAS'/PASP 是预后的最强独立预测因子,其危险比 (HR) 为 0.67 (0.531-0.840),P < 0.001。重构 ROC 曲线 0.8 (0.723-0.859),p < 0.001,我们得出 TAS'/PASP ≤ 0.19(cm/s/mm Hg)的临界值(灵敏度 74.0,特异性 75.2)。TAS'/RVSP ≤ 0.19 的患者预后较差(对数秩 p < 0.001)。结论:该研究证实了之前已知的 HfrEF 患者不良预后的独立预测因素--高龄、心房颤动、LAVI 和 LVEF,但无创的 RV-PA 耦合参数 TAPSE/PASP 和 TAS'/PASP 改善了 HFrEF 患者的风险分层。可变的 TAS'/PASP 已被证明是一年预后最有力的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personalized Management of Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Vitreoretinopathy Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation in Preterm Infants: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Recent Update on Pathophysiology and Treatment Effect of FluoRoquinolones on Aortic Growth, aortic stIffness and wave refLEctionS (FRAGILES study) Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Predict the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1