(Re)riteing the Land: Sogorea Te’ Land Trust, Amah Mutsun Land Trust, and Indigenous Resurgence in California

IF 1.2 Q1 HISTORY American Indian culture and research journal Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.17953/a3.1656
Abel R. Gomez
{"title":"(Re)riteing the Land: Sogorea Te’ Land Trust, Amah Mutsun Land Trust, and Indigenous Resurgence in California","authors":"Abel R. Gomez","doi":"10.17953/a3.1656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land and land access is returning to Indigenous peoples across the world. This article theorizes ways that two California tribal organizations, Sogorea Te’ Land Trust and Amah Mutsun Land Trust, are revitalizing cultural practices through renewed access to land. Defying narratives of “extinction” as nonrecognized California tribes, the work of these organizations is not simply about cultural or political resurgence, however, but also about the creative restoration of sacred practices that situate the communities in a robust web of relations, both seen and unseen. Building on Cutcha Risling Baldy’s theory of “(re)riteing,” this article examines how ceremony is a central part of land-based resurgence for these organizations. The author shows that returning to land after multiple waves of colonization and dispossession means “(re)riteing” the land through ceremonies, songs, and prayers. These practices root tribal members in ancestral ways of relating to their territory. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, this paper argues that this “(re)riteing” is a vital example of what Laura Harjo describes as “Indigenous futurity praxis.” Taken together, Sogorea Te’ Land Trust and Amah Mutsun Land Trust suggest that Indigenous land-based resurgence is both political and cultural, epistemological and cosmological, part of global movements toward dynamic Indigenous futures.","PeriodicalId":80424,"journal":{"name":"American Indian culture and research journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Indian culture and research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17953/a3.1656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land and land access is returning to Indigenous peoples across the world. This article theorizes ways that two California tribal organizations, Sogorea Te’ Land Trust and Amah Mutsun Land Trust, are revitalizing cultural practices through renewed access to land. Defying narratives of “extinction” as nonrecognized California tribes, the work of these organizations is not simply about cultural or political resurgence, however, but also about the creative restoration of sacred practices that situate the communities in a robust web of relations, both seen and unseen. Building on Cutcha Risling Baldy’s theory of “(re)riteing,” this article examines how ceremony is a central part of land-based resurgence for these organizations. The author shows that returning to land after multiple waves of colonization and dispossession means “(re)riteing” the land through ceremonies, songs, and prayers. These practices root tribal members in ancestral ways of relating to their territory. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, this paper argues that this “(re)riteing” is a vital example of what Laura Harjo describes as “Indigenous futurity praxis.” Taken together, Sogorea Te’ Land Trust and Amah Mutsun Land Trust suggest that Indigenous land-based resurgence is both political and cultural, epistemological and cosmological, part of global movements toward dynamic Indigenous futures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(重新)规定土地:Sogorea Te'土地信托基金、Amah Mutsun 土地信托基金和加利福尼亚州土著人的复兴
土地和土地使用权正在回归世界各地的原住民。本文对加利福尼亚州的两个部落组织--Sogorea Te' 土地信托基金和 Amah Mutsun 土地信托基金--通过重新获得土地来振兴文化习俗的方式进行了理论分析。作为未被承认的加利福尼亚部落,这些组织的工作不仅是为了文化或政治复兴,也是为了创造性地恢复神圣的习俗,将社区置于一个强大的关系网中,既有看得见的,也有看不见的。本文以库查-里斯林-巴尔迪(Cutcha Risling Baldy)的"(重新)仪式 "理论为基础,探讨了仪式如何成为这些组织以土地为基础的复兴的核心部分。作者指出,在经历了多次殖民和剥夺之后,回归土地意味着通过仪式、歌曲和祈祷对土地进行"(重新)仪式化"。这些做法使部落成员根植于祖先与其领地相关的方式。本文根据人种学田野调查,认为这种"(重新)仪式化 "是劳拉-哈霍(Laura Harjo)所描述的 "土著未来实践 "的一个重要例子。Sogorea Te' 土地信托基金和 Amah Mutsun 土地信托基金共同表明,以土地为基础的土著复兴既是政治的,也是文化的,既是认识论的,也是宇宙论的,是迈向充满活力的土著未来的全球运动的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Vaudeville Indians” on Global Circuits, 1880s to 1930s Ballot Collection and Native American Voters: An Assessment of Benefits and Costs Beyond the White Picket Fence: American Indians, Suburbanization, and Homeownership Land, Labor, and Relationality: A Critical Engagement of Marx and Indigenous Studies We Are Meant to Rise: Voices for Justice from Minneapolis to the World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1