Using the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Tool to Improve the Automatic Stop Order Process

Ghada Hussain Al Mardawi, R. Rajendram, Arwa Balharith, Abdulaziz Alomaim
{"title":"Using the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Tool to Improve the Automatic Stop Order Process","authors":"Ghada Hussain Al Mardawi, R. Rajendram, Arwa Balharith, Abdulaziz Alomaim","doi":"10.36401/jqsh-24-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Automatic stop orders (ASOs) in computerized prescription order entry (CPOE) systems predefine the length of treatment. This can improve resource use for select therapies (e.g., empirical antibiotics). However, root cause analysis of dose omission errors identified inappropriate ASO-directed termination of medications without prescriber notification. This quality improvement initiative aimed to identify potential failures of the medication ASO processes to develop a new workflow and anticipate issues that may arise after implementation.\n \n \n \n A failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) was conducted following Institute of Healthcare Improvement guidance. A multidisciplinary ASO-FMEA team reviewed the existing workflow. Failure modes, risk priority numbers (RPNs), and interventions were identified and assessed. The RPNs calculated for the proposed new workflow (assuming all recommendations were implemented) were compared with those of the existing workflow.\n \n \n \n Eight failure modes, 17 effects, and 31 causes were identified in the five workflow steps (mean RPN 365.4; median 280). Specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound interventions were proposed. Assuming successful implementation of all recommendations, the RPNs of the proposed workflow (mean 117.6; median 112) were significantly lower (p < 0.05).\n \n \n \n When modifying existing CPOE systems, FMEA may identify possible failures that can be addressed before the implementation of a new process. This may prevent errors, improving medication safety. Regardless, continuous audit and monitoring are required to ensure the effectiveness of implemented changes.\n","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/jqsh-24-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automatic stop orders (ASOs) in computerized prescription order entry (CPOE) systems predefine the length of treatment. This can improve resource use for select therapies (e.g., empirical antibiotics). However, root cause analysis of dose omission errors identified inappropriate ASO-directed termination of medications without prescriber notification. This quality improvement initiative aimed to identify potential failures of the medication ASO processes to develop a new workflow and anticipate issues that may arise after implementation. A failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) was conducted following Institute of Healthcare Improvement guidance. A multidisciplinary ASO-FMEA team reviewed the existing workflow. Failure modes, risk priority numbers (RPNs), and interventions were identified and assessed. The RPNs calculated for the proposed new workflow (assuming all recommendations were implemented) were compared with those of the existing workflow. Eight failure modes, 17 effects, and 31 causes were identified in the five workflow steps (mean RPN 365.4; median 280). Specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound interventions were proposed. Assuming successful implementation of all recommendations, the RPNs of the proposed workflow (mean 117.6; median 112) were significantly lower (p < 0.05). When modifying existing CPOE systems, FMEA may identify possible failures that can be addressed before the implementation of a new process. This may prevent errors, improving medication safety. Regardless, continuous audit and monitoring are required to ensure the effectiveness of implemented changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用故障模式和影响分析工具改进自动停止命令流程
计算机化处方单输入(CPOE)系统中的自动停止处方单(ASO)可预先确定治疗时间。这可以提高特定疗法(如经验性抗生素)的资源利用率。然而,对剂量遗漏错误的根本原因分析发现,在未通知处方医生的情况下,存在不适当的 ASO 定向终止用药的情况。这项质量改进措施旨在找出用药 ASO 流程的潜在故障,以制定新的工作流程,并预测实施后可能出现的问题。 根据美国医疗保健改进研究所的指导,进行了故障模式和影响分析(FMEA)。一个多学科的 ASO-FMEA 小组审查了现有的工作流程。确定并评估了故障模式、风险优先级(RPN)和干预措施。将为建议的新工作流程(假设所有建议都已实施)计算出的 RPN 与现有工作流程的 RPN 进行了比较。 在五个工作流程步骤中确定了 8 种故障模式、17 种影响和 31 种原因(平均 RPN 为 365.4;中位数为 280)。提出了具体的、可衡量的、可实现的、现实的和有时限的干预措施。假定成功实施所有建议,建议工作流程的 RPN(平均值 117.6;中位数 112)将显著降低(p < 0.05)。 在修改现有 CPOE 系统时,FMEA 可以发现可能存在的故障,从而在实施新流程之前解决这些故障。这可以防止错误发生,提高用药安全。无论如何,都需要进行持续的审核和监控,以确保所实施更改的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Transforming Hospital Quality Improvement Through Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence. Transforming Hospital Housekeeping: The Kayakalp Journey Patient-Centered Healthcare: From Patient Experience to Human Experience Reply to Blom: Drugs Do Not Work in Patients Who Cannot Tolerate Them
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1