A Modified Lateral Seminal Vesicle Approach Preserving the Bladder Neck in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Improves Urinary Continence Recovery

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annali italiani di chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.62713/aic.3309
Xishuang Zhan, Quanming Liu, Jun Xu, Jun Ouyang
{"title":"A Modified Lateral Seminal Vesicle Approach Preserving the Bladder Neck in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Improves Urinary Continence Recovery","authors":"Xishuang Zhan, Quanming Liu, Jun Xu, Jun Ouyang","doi":"10.62713/aic.3309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of laparoscopic lateral seminal vesicle approach to preserve the bladder neck during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. \nMETHODS: Between September 2020 and December 2022, we retrospectively analyzed patients with T1–T3b stage prostate cancer treated at our institution using the laparoscopic lateral seminal vesicle approach. We recorded the bladder neck preservation success rate, cystourethral anastomosis time, urinary catheter extraction time, length of hospital stay, and urinary control scores, including urine pad use, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-catheter removal. Adverse events included rectal injury, bladder injury, ureteral injury and positive surgical margins. \nRESULTS: There were 56 patients (mean age 70 ± 5.8 years) The success rate of bladder neck preservation was 100%. The median cystourethral anastomosis time was 11 (9–14) minutes. The median postoperative hospital stay was 10 (9–11) days. The urinary continence rate was 83.9% (47/56) in 1 week, 89.3% (50/56) in 1 month and 98.2% (55/56) in 3 months. One patient developed adhesions caused by invasion of both seminal vesicles, which damaged the rectal wall. \nCONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic lateral seminal vesicle approach can preserve the bladder neck completely during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, improving postoperative urinary continence, with a high rate of immediate urinary continence, and significantly improving patients' quality of life. ","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of laparoscopic lateral seminal vesicle approach to preserve the bladder neck during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.  METHODS: Between September 2020 and December 2022, we retrospectively analyzed patients with T1–T3b stage prostate cancer treated at our institution using the laparoscopic lateral seminal vesicle approach. We recorded the bladder neck preservation success rate, cystourethral anastomosis time, urinary catheter extraction time, length of hospital stay, and urinary control scores, including urine pad use, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-catheter removal. Adverse events included rectal injury, bladder injury, ureteral injury and positive surgical margins.  RESULTS: There were 56 patients (mean age 70 ± 5.8 years) The success rate of bladder neck preservation was 100%. The median cystourethral anastomosis time was 11 (9–14) minutes. The median postoperative hospital stay was 10 (9–11) days. The urinary continence rate was 83.9% (47/56) in 1 week, 89.3% (50/56) in 1 month and 98.2% (55/56) in 3 months. One patient developed adhesions caused by invasion of both seminal vesicles, which damaged the rectal wall.  CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic lateral seminal vesicle approach can preserve the bladder neck completely during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, improving postoperative urinary continence, with a high rate of immediate urinary continence, and significantly improving patients' quality of life. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中保留膀胱颈的改良侧精囊入路可改善尿失禁恢复情况
目的:本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中采用腹腔镜侧精囊入路保留膀胱颈的效果。方法:在2020年9月至2022年12月期间,我们回顾性分析了本院采用腹腔镜侧精囊入路治疗的T1-T3b期前列腺癌患者。我们记录了膀胱颈保留成功率、膀胱尿道吻合时间、导尿管拔出时间、住院时间以及导尿管拔出后 1 周、1 个月和 3 个月的排尿控制评分,包括尿垫使用情况。不良事件包括直肠损伤、膀胱损伤、输尿管损伤和手术切缘阳性。结果:56 名患者(平均年龄 70 ± 5.8 岁)的膀胱颈保留成功率为 100%。膀胱尿道吻合术的中位时间为 11 (9-14) 分钟。术后中位住院时间为 10(9-11)天。1周内的尿失禁率为83.9%(47/56),1个月内的尿失禁率为89.3%(50/56),3个月内的尿失禁率为98.2%(55/56)。一名患者因双侧精囊受侵而发生粘连,损伤了直肠壁。结论:腹腔镜侧精囊入路可在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中完全保留膀胱颈,改善术后排尿功能,即刻排尿率高,显著提高患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
期刊最新文献
A Modified Lateral Seminal Vesicle Approach Preserving the Bladder Neck in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Improves Urinary Continence Recovery Treatment Options and the Management of Complications in Hydatid Cysts of the Liver in Endemic Regions Analysis of Influencing Factors of Postoperative Quality of Life in Patients with Renal Cancer under the Continuing Care Model Based on the Omaha System Implications of Pretreatment Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and Perineural Invasion with Staging, Prognosis, and Management in Stage I-III Colon Cancer after Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the SEER Database Clinical Efficacy of Percutaneous Balloon Compression Combined with Carbamazepine in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1