In the Eye of the Beholder—Visual Search Behavior in Equestrian Dressage Judges

Animals Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.3390/ani14142025
Inga Wolframm, Peter Reuter, Iulia Zaharia, J. Vernooij
{"title":"In the Eye of the Beholder—Visual Search Behavior in Equestrian Dressage Judges","authors":"Inga Wolframm, Peter Reuter, Iulia Zaharia, J. Vernooij","doi":"10.3390/ani14142025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the visual search behavior of equestrian dressage judges at different expertise levels during the assessment of Grand Prix horse-rider combinations. Twenty judges (11 foundational level, 9 advanced level) participated in the study, with their eye movements recorded using Tobii Fusion Eyetracker as they evaluated video recordings of dressage tests. Fixation metrics, namely Total Duration of Fixation (TDF), Average Duration of Fixation (ADF), and Total Number of Fixations (TNF), were analyzed across four Areas of Interest (AOIs): front, back, rider, and horse’s feet. Statistical analysis utilized linear mixed-effects models. Results demonstrated that judges consistently focused more on the front of the horse, with additional differences in fixation duration and frequency based on judge experience and specific movements. Advanced judges focused more on the horses’ feet, suggesting they draw meaning from specific areas indicative of performance quality. Conversely, foundational level judges focused more on the rider, reflecting different evaluative priorities at lower levels of the sport. These findings suggest that judges focus on a limited number of highly relevant areas, differing across movements and expertise levels. The study underscores the necessity of understanding both gaze behavior and subsequent interpretations of visual information to increase judging transparency, fairness, and equine welfare.","PeriodicalId":502248,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"52 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14142025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the visual search behavior of equestrian dressage judges at different expertise levels during the assessment of Grand Prix horse-rider combinations. Twenty judges (11 foundational level, 9 advanced level) participated in the study, with their eye movements recorded using Tobii Fusion Eyetracker as they evaluated video recordings of dressage tests. Fixation metrics, namely Total Duration of Fixation (TDF), Average Duration of Fixation (ADF), and Total Number of Fixations (TNF), were analyzed across four Areas of Interest (AOIs): front, back, rider, and horse’s feet. Statistical analysis utilized linear mixed-effects models. Results demonstrated that judges consistently focused more on the front of the horse, with additional differences in fixation duration and frequency based on judge experience and specific movements. Advanced judges focused more on the horses’ feet, suggesting they draw meaning from specific areas indicative of performance quality. Conversely, foundational level judges focused more on the rider, reflecting different evaluative priorities at lower levels of the sport. These findings suggest that judges focus on a limited number of highly relevant areas, differing across movements and expertise levels. The study underscores the necessity of understanding both gaze behavior and subsequent interpretations of visual information to increase judging transparency, fairness, and equine welfare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
看马者的眼睛--马术盛装舞步裁判的视觉搜索行为
本研究调查了不同专业水平的马术盛装舞步裁判在评估大奖赛马匹与骑手组合时的视觉搜索行为。20 名裁判(11 名基础级,9 名高级)参加了研究,他们在评估盛装舞步测试视频记录时使用 Tobii Fusion Eyetracker 记录了眼球运动。研究分析了四个兴趣区(AOI)的定点指标,即总定点持续时间(TDF)、平均定点持续时间(ADF)和总定点次数(TNF):前方、后方、骑手和马脚。统计分析采用线性混合效应模型。结果表明,评委始终更关注马匹的前部,根据评委的经验和具体动作,固定时长和频率也有所不同。高级评委更关注马匹的脚部,这表明他们从特定区域汲取意义,表明马匹的表现质量。相反,基础水平的评委则更关注骑手,这反映出在较低水平的运动中,评委的评价重点有所不同。这些研究结果表明,评委关注的高度相关区域数量有限,不同动作和专业水平的评委关注的重点也不尽相同。这项研究强调了了解注视行为和随后对视觉信息的解释的必要性,以提高评判的透明度、公平性和马匹福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Plasma Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin and Kidney Injury Molecule-1 in Small-Breed Dogs: A Retrospective Pilot Study Isolation of Aerobic Bacterial Species Associated with Palpable Udder Defects in Non-Dairy Ewes Amur Tiger Individual Identification Based on the Improved InceptionResNetV2 Identification of ActivinβA and Gonadotropin Regulation of the Activin System in the Ovary of Chinese Sturgeon Acipenser sinensis Reconstruction of the Quadriceps Extensor Mechanism with a Calcaneal Tendon–Bone Allograft in a Dog with a Resorbed Tibial Tuberosity Fracture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1