Constitutive modelling in computational geomechanics – 61st Rankine lecture, British Geotechnical Association, 2023

John P. Carter
{"title":"Constitutive modelling in computational geomechanics – 61st Rankine lecture, British Geotechnical Association, 2023","authors":"John P. Carter","doi":"10.1680/jgeot.23.rl.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constitutive models are an essential part of computational modelling in geotechnics; they are at the heart of almost all theoretical predictions of geotechnical structures. How the stress-strain (and perhaps time) response of soil (and rock) is represented in these mathematical models is usually the key to successful prediction of the behaviour of geotechnical structures. However, the important details of these models, particularly the idealisations that are made, may be poorly or incompletely understood, or ignored, sometimes at significant cost to the unwary analyst. Indeed, the capabilities and the shortcomings of these models, especially the more advanced models, are not always easy to ascertain. In some cases, determination of the values of the input parameters is not straightforward. Consequently, it may be difficult to determine which model to select for a particular task. This paper explores some of the more important developments in the constitutive modelling of soils and addresses some of these issues of potential concern. The need for such models and the various attributes and capabilities that the commonly used models possess is reviewed. Also discussed is the issue of matching a particular model to the geotechnical problem at hand, which model attributes are required and why. The intention is to place emphasis on the physical basis of these models, rather than explore their mathematical complexity in detail. Some of the constitutive models encoded in the software packages used routinely in geotechnical practice are reviewed, and discussion is also provided on their specific limitations. Examples of practical applications, involving the solution of boundary and initial value problems, are described to illustrate both the advantages and some of the limitations of both commonly used and highly advanced constitutive models.","PeriodicalId":508398,"journal":{"name":"Géotechnique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Géotechnique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.23.rl.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constitutive models are an essential part of computational modelling in geotechnics; they are at the heart of almost all theoretical predictions of geotechnical structures. How the stress-strain (and perhaps time) response of soil (and rock) is represented in these mathematical models is usually the key to successful prediction of the behaviour of geotechnical structures. However, the important details of these models, particularly the idealisations that are made, may be poorly or incompletely understood, or ignored, sometimes at significant cost to the unwary analyst. Indeed, the capabilities and the shortcomings of these models, especially the more advanced models, are not always easy to ascertain. In some cases, determination of the values of the input parameters is not straightforward. Consequently, it may be difficult to determine which model to select for a particular task. This paper explores some of the more important developments in the constitutive modelling of soils and addresses some of these issues of potential concern. The need for such models and the various attributes and capabilities that the commonly used models possess is reviewed. Also discussed is the issue of matching a particular model to the geotechnical problem at hand, which model attributes are required and why. The intention is to place emphasis on the physical basis of these models, rather than explore their mathematical complexity in detail. Some of the constitutive models encoded in the software packages used routinely in geotechnical practice are reviewed, and discussion is also provided on their specific limitations. Examples of practical applications, involving the solution of boundary and initial value problems, are described to illustrate both the advantages and some of the limitations of both commonly used and highly advanced constitutive models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算地质力学中的构造建模 - 第 61 次兰金讲座,英国岩土工程协会,2023 年
构造模型是岩土工程计算建模的重要组成部分;它们几乎是所有岩土结构理论预测的核心。如何在这些数学模型中表示土壤(和岩石)的应力-应变(或许还有时间)反应通常是成功预测岩土结构行为的关键。然而,对这些模型的重要细节,特别是所做的理想化处理,可能理解不深或不全面,或被忽视,有时会给不谨慎的分析人员带来重大损失。事实上,这些模型,尤其是较先进的模型的能力和缺点并不总是很容易确定的。在某些情况下,输入参数值的确定并不简单。因此,可能很难确定为特定任务选择哪种模型。本文探讨了土壤组成模型中一些更重要的发展,并解决了其中一些潜在的问题。本文回顾了对此类模型的需求以及常用模型所具有的各种属性和能力。此外,还讨论了特定模型与当前岩土工程问题的匹配问题、需要哪些模型属性及其原因。目的是强调这些模型的物理基础,而不是详细探讨其数学复杂性。本文对岩土工程实践中常用的软件包中编码的一些构造模型进行了评述,并对这些模型的具体局限性进行了讨论。此外,还介绍了涉及边界和初值问题求解的实际应用实例,以说明常用和高度先进的构造模型的优点和某些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Axial behaviour of steel pipelines buried in sand: effects of surface roughness and hardness Development of a new soil-structure contact stress sensor for underground construction applications Quantification of spatial heterogeneity and its influence on particle migration Particle tracking–aided digital volume correlation for clay-sand soil mixtures Maximum shear modulus anisotropy of rooted soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1