Abdelmounim Boughaleb, Reda Tariqi, Hussein Abdallah, I. Ziani, I. Boualaoui, Ahmed Ibrahimi, H. E. Sayegh, Yassine Nouini
{"title":"Outcomes of Cystodistension for Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Monocentric Analysis","authors":"Abdelmounim Boughaleb, Reda Tariqi, Hussein Abdallah, I. Ziani, I. Boualaoui, Ahmed Ibrahimi, H. E. Sayegh, Yassine Nouini","doi":"10.36348/sjm.2024.v09i07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is a chronic condition characterized by pelvic pain and urinary urgency/frequency. While the exact cause of BPS is unknown, various treatment options exist. This study aimed to evaluate bladder hydrodistension's short- and long-term efficacy in BPS patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of four female BPS patients treated with bladder hydrodistension over 10 years was conducted. Symptoms, cystoscopy findings, and treatment outcomes were reviewed. Results: The average patient age was 40 years. All patients reported pain, with an average of 13 daytime and 3 nighttime urinary voids per day. Hydrodistension improved symptoms in 75% of patients, reducing daytime frequency and nocturia. Cystoscopy after hydrodistension revealed Hunner's ulcers in one patient and petechiae in three. One patient required a second hydrodistension. Transient worsening of symptoms and hematuria occurred in one patient each. Discussion: Bladder hydrodistension appears to be a safe and effective treatment for BPS, improving symptoms in most patients in our study. The findings are consistent with previous reports suggesting. Our study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting hydrodistension as a valuable tool in managing BPS. Conclusion: Bladder hydrodistension is a simple and minimally invasive technique that has proven its efficacy with a low complication rate. Our findings support the existing literature on the benefits of hydrodistension for BPS.","PeriodicalId":510088,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine","volume":"103 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjm.2024.v09i07.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is a chronic condition characterized by pelvic pain and urinary urgency/frequency. While the exact cause of BPS is unknown, various treatment options exist. This study aimed to evaluate bladder hydrodistension's short- and long-term efficacy in BPS patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of four female BPS patients treated with bladder hydrodistension over 10 years was conducted. Symptoms, cystoscopy findings, and treatment outcomes were reviewed. Results: The average patient age was 40 years. All patients reported pain, with an average of 13 daytime and 3 nighttime urinary voids per day. Hydrodistension improved symptoms in 75% of patients, reducing daytime frequency and nocturia. Cystoscopy after hydrodistension revealed Hunner's ulcers in one patient and petechiae in three. One patient required a second hydrodistension. Transient worsening of symptoms and hematuria occurred in one patient each. Discussion: Bladder hydrodistension appears to be a safe and effective treatment for BPS, improving symptoms in most patients in our study. The findings are consistent with previous reports suggesting. Our study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting hydrodistension as a valuable tool in managing BPS. Conclusion: Bladder hydrodistension is a simple and minimally invasive technique that has proven its efficacy with a low complication rate. Our findings support the existing literature on the benefits of hydrodistension for BPS.