EVALUATION OF PIEZO-ASSISTED RIDGE SPLITTING USING OSSEODENSIFICATION DRILLS IN NARROW ANTERIOR MAXILLA WITH SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT (CLINICAL TRIAL)

Mahmoud Abdelfattah Moghazy Elbayaa, A. Shaaban, Mohamed Shokry
{"title":"EVALUATION OF PIEZO-ASSISTED RIDGE SPLITTING USING OSSEODENSIFICATION DRILLS IN NARROW ANTERIOR MAXILLA WITH SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT (CLINICAL TRIAL)","authors":"Mahmoud Abdelfattah Moghazy Elbayaa, A. Shaaban, Mohamed Shokry","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2023.245469.1429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: One of the most effective methods for horizontal bone augmentation, particularly in the maxilla, is the alveolar ridge splitting technique. But it is a highly sensitive technique that requires some experience, so using a piezoelectric device for ridge splitting provides high accuracy with fewer complications. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to assess maxillary anterior ridge splitting using piezotome and osseodensification drills with immediate implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight patients (12 dental implants) with a narrow anterior maxillary ridge without an undercut participated in this clinical study. They were given the assignment of ridge splitting in the anterior segment of the maxilla along with simultaneous implant insertion. Clinical evaluation was done to determine implant stability, postoperative edema and the incidence of intra-or postoperative complications. Radiographic evaluation (CBCT), which uses on-demand software to determine bone density surrounding the implant and bone width gain at the crest of the bone, was done. Clinical and radiographic follow up were done over 6 months. RESULTS: All patients had uneventful wound healing, with the exception of one who had a malformed split and another who had a slight infection that was treated conservatively. Six months postoperatively, bone width was 17.56±10.75% wider than preoperatively, with a statistically significant difference (P value = 0.007*). After six months, there was a 40.56±10.86% increase in bone density, with a statistically significant difference (P value = 0.013*). CONCLUSION: Alveolar ridge splitting using piezotome and osseodensification drills with immediate implant placement appears to be efficient in the treatment of narrow anterior maxillary ridges with less time-consuming.","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":"121 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2023.245469.1429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most effective methods for horizontal bone augmentation, particularly in the maxilla, is the alveolar ridge splitting technique. But it is a highly sensitive technique that requires some experience, so using a piezoelectric device for ridge splitting provides high accuracy with fewer complications. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to assess maxillary anterior ridge splitting using piezotome and osseodensification drills with immediate implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight patients (12 dental implants) with a narrow anterior maxillary ridge without an undercut participated in this clinical study. They were given the assignment of ridge splitting in the anterior segment of the maxilla along with simultaneous implant insertion. Clinical evaluation was done to determine implant stability, postoperative edema and the incidence of intra-or postoperative complications. Radiographic evaluation (CBCT), which uses on-demand software to determine bone density surrounding the implant and bone width gain at the crest of the bone, was done. Clinical and radiographic follow up were done over 6 months. RESULTS: All patients had uneventful wound healing, with the exception of one who had a malformed split and another who had a slight infection that was treated conservatively. Six months postoperatively, bone width was 17.56±10.75% wider than preoperatively, with a statistically significant difference (P value = 0.007*). After six months, there was a 40.56±10.86% increase in bone density, with a statistically significant difference (P value = 0.013*). CONCLUSION: Alveolar ridge splitting using piezotome and osseodensification drills with immediate implant placement appears to be efficient in the treatment of narrow anterior maxillary ridges with less time-consuming.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在狭窄的上颌骨前部使用骨增生钻进行压电辅助脊分裂并同时植入种植体的评估(临床试验)
背景:牙槽嵴分裂技术是水平骨增量最有效的方法之一,尤其是在上颌骨。但这是一种高度敏感的技术,需要一定的经验,因此使用压电设备进行牙槽嵴分裂可提供较高的准确性,同时减少并发症。研究目的:本研究旨在评估使用压电钻和骨增量钻进行上颌前牙嵴分裂并即刻植入种植体的效果。材料与方法:八名上颌前牙嵴狭窄且无下切的患者(12 个种植体)参与了这项临床研究。他们的任务是在上颌骨前段进行牙槽嵴分割,同时植入种植体。临床评估的目的是确定种植体的稳定性、术后水肿以及术中或术后并发症的发生率。此外,还进行了放射学评估(CBCT),通过按需使用的软件来确定种植体周围的骨密度和骨嵴处的骨宽度增加情况。6 个月后进行临床和放射学随访。结果:所有患者的伤口愈合都很顺利,只有一名患者伤口畸形,另一名患者有轻微感染,但已采取保守治疗。术后 6 个月,骨宽度比术前增加了 17.56±10.75%,差异有统计学意义(P 值 = 0.007*)。六个月后,骨密度增加了 40.56±10.86%,差异有统计学意义(P 值 = 0.013*)。结论:使用压刀和骨增量钻进行牙槽嵴劈裂,并立即植入种植体,似乎能有效治疗上颌前嵴狭窄,且耗时较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microleakage Assessment Using Different Composite Application Techniques in Primary Molars. An In-Vitro Comparative Study “THERAPEUTIC EFFECT OF FLAXSEEDS ON OSTEOPOROSIS IN ALVEOLAR BONE OF RATS” EVALUATION OF BONE HEALING BY MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS IN RABBITS (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY) EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN MANDIBULAR MOLAR INTER-RADICULAR SEPTUM USING OSSEODENSIFICATION TECHNIQUE (CLINICAL TRIAL) KIAA0101 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EXPRESSION IN DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA BETWEEN AMELOBLASTOMA AND AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1