It’s not a sprint, it’s a marathon: reviewing governmental R&D support for environmental innovation

IF 4.4 4区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Environmental Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1080/09640568.2024.2359442
Leonie Meißner, Sonja Peterson, F. Semrau
{"title":"It’s not a sprint, it’s a marathon: reviewing governmental R&D support for environmental innovation","authors":"Leonie Meißner, Sonja Peterson, F. Semrau","doi":"10.1080/09640568.2024.2359442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a race against excessive global warming, the world must accelerate the development and adoption of environmental innovations (EIs). EIs are crucial in decarbonizing the economy and meeting the net-zero targets. In this literature review, we delve into the role of governments in promoting EIs across stages of maturity and the likeliness of such support to reduce emissions and mitigation costs. Various theoretical justifications, such as knowledge externalities, dynamic increasing returns, path dependency and incomplete information, highlight the necessity to promote EI through governmental Research and Development (R&D) support. While emission pricing remains the most cost-efficient climate policy, it fails as a stand-alone instrument to sufficiently encourage EI. Accordingly, the optimal approach is a policy mix complementing emission pricing with governmental R&D support. The theoretical finding is backed by empirical studies on the development and deployment of renewable energies, which also show that investment in R&D can effectively reduce emissions and mitigation costs. By combining theoretical and empirical research, the review concludes by examining two pivotal policy actions aimed at accelerating the take-off of EIs: The US Inflation Reduction Act and the European Green New Deal Industrial Plan. We evaluate their specific aspects and limitations to effectively and efficiently contribute to decarbonization.","PeriodicalId":48149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2024.2359442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In a race against excessive global warming, the world must accelerate the development and adoption of environmental innovations (EIs). EIs are crucial in decarbonizing the economy and meeting the net-zero targets. In this literature review, we delve into the role of governments in promoting EIs across stages of maturity and the likeliness of such support to reduce emissions and mitigation costs. Various theoretical justifications, such as knowledge externalities, dynamic increasing returns, path dependency and incomplete information, highlight the necessity to promote EI through governmental Research and Development (R&D) support. While emission pricing remains the most cost-efficient climate policy, it fails as a stand-alone instrument to sufficiently encourage EI. Accordingly, the optimal approach is a policy mix complementing emission pricing with governmental R&D support. The theoretical finding is backed by empirical studies on the development and deployment of renewable energies, which also show that investment in R&D can effectively reduce emissions and mitigation costs. By combining theoretical and empirical research, the review concludes by examining two pivotal policy actions aimed at accelerating the take-off of EIs: The US Inflation Reduction Act and the European Green New Deal Industrial Plan. We evaluate their specific aspects and limitations to effectively and efficiently contribute to decarbonization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不是短跑,而是马拉松:审查政府对环境创新的研发支持
在应对全球过度变暖的竞赛中,世界必须加快开发和采用环境创新(EIs)。环境创新对经济去碳化和实现净零目标至关重要。在这篇文献综述中,我们将深入探讨政府在促进不同成熟阶段的环境创新中所扮演的角色,以及这种支持在减少排放和缓解成本方面的可能性。各种理论依据,如知识外部性、动态收益递增、路径依赖和信息不完全等,都强调了通过政府研发支持促进环境创新的必要性。虽然排放定价仍是最具成本效益的气候政策,但作为一种独立的工具,它无法充分鼓励环境创新。因此,最佳方法是将排放定价与政府研发支持相结合。有关可再生能源开发和应用的实证研究支持了这一理论发现,这些研究还表明,研发投资可以有效降低排放和减排成本。结合理论和实证研究,本综述最后探讨了旨在加速环境创新起飞的两项关键政策行动:美国的《通货膨胀削减法案》和欧洲的《绿色新政工业计划》。我们评估了它们的具体方面和局限性,以切实有效地促进去碳化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management has already established itself as a leading forum for up-to-date scholarly but accessible papers on all aspects of environmental planning and management. With contributions from leading international authors, the Journal publishes influential, high quality papers -an essential feature whether you are a subscriber, reader, contributor or all three. The Editors and International Editorial Advisory Board are drawn from around the world and are committed to encouraging researchers and practitioners to contribute to multidisciplinary and international debate in the field. The central aim is to focus on the integrated planning and management of the environment.
期刊最新文献
It’s not a sprint, it’s a marathon: reviewing governmental R&D support for environmental innovation Facilitation or inhibition? Government environmental attention and corporate green technology innovation Exploring Ethical Space in land use planning: a case study of the Upper Columbia, British Columbia Does voluntary environmental regulation stimulate corporate green innovation efficiency? An empirical study from China’s A-share listed companies Can green fiscal policy improve green total factor carbon efficiency? Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1