Immunosuppression, tonsillectomy and remissions in high-risk IgA-nephropathy

Pub Date : 2024-07-07 DOI:10.26442/00403660.2024.06.202728
Z. Kochoyan, Alina Z. Lieva, Tatyana O. Galkovskaya, V. Dobronravov
{"title":"Immunosuppression, tonsillectomy and remissions in high-risk IgA-nephropathy","authors":"Z. Kochoyan, Alina Z. Lieva, Tatyana O. Galkovskaya, V. Dobronravov","doi":"10.26442/00403660.2024.06.202728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim.To evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and tonsillectomy (TE) in patients with high-risk IgA nephropathy (IgAN). \nMaterials and мethods. The retrospective study cohort included cases with primary IgAN (n=213, age 34±11 years, male 52%) at high risk of progression with clinical and morphological data collected. The follow-up was 26 (10; 61) months. The association of IST without TE (IST; n=141) or with TE (IST+TE; n=72) with the development of complete (PR), partial (PR) and overall (PR or PR, OR) remissions was investigated. \nResults. The incidence of achieving early PR or OR in the IST and IST+TE groups was 65.2% and 86.1%, respectively (p=0.002). The probability of early PR or OR was significantly increased in the IST+TE group compared to IST [HR 1.714 (1.214–2.420) and HR 3.410 (1.309–8.880), respectively]. IST+TE was associated with a 3- to 4-fold increase in the likelihood of PR or OR at the end of follow-up [HR 2.575 (1.679–3.950) and HR 4.768 (2.434–9.337), respectively]. Analyses using pseudorandomisation methods yielded similar results. \nConclusion. TE may be effective for remission induction in high-risk IgAN.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/00403660.2024.06.202728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim.To evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and tonsillectomy (TE) in patients with high-risk IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Materials and мethods. The retrospective study cohort included cases with primary IgAN (n=213, age 34±11 years, male 52%) at high risk of progression with clinical and morphological data collected. The follow-up was 26 (10; 61) months. The association of IST without TE (IST; n=141) or with TE (IST+TE; n=72) with the development of complete (PR), partial (PR) and overall (PR or PR, OR) remissions was investigated. Results. The incidence of achieving early PR or OR in the IST and IST+TE groups was 65.2% and 86.1%, respectively (p=0.002). The probability of early PR or OR was significantly increased in the IST+TE group compared to IST [HR 1.714 (1.214–2.420) and HR 3.410 (1.309–8.880), respectively]. IST+TE was associated with a 3- to 4-fold increase in the likelihood of PR or OR at the end of follow-up [HR 2.575 (1.679–3.950) and HR 4.768 (2.434–9.337), respectively]. Analyses using pseudorandomisation methods yielded similar results. Conclusion. TE may be effective for remission induction in high-risk IgAN.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
免疫抑制、扁桃体切除术和高风险 IgA 肾病的缓解
目的:评估免疫抑制疗法(IST)和扁桃体切除术(TE)对高危 IgA 肾病(IgAN)患者的疗效。材料和方法。回顾性研究队列包括原发性IgAN高危病例(n=213,年龄34±11岁,男性占52%),并收集了临床和形态学数据。随访时间为 26 (10; 61) 个月。研究了不含 TE 的 IST(IST;n=141)或含 TE 的 IST(IST+TE;n=72)与完全缓解(PR)、部分缓解(PR)和总体缓解(PR 或 PR,OR)的关系。结果显示在 IST 组和 IST+TE 组中,早期 PR 或 OR 的发生率分别为 65.2% 和 86.1%(P=0.002)。与 IST 相比,IST+TE 组早期 PR 或 OR 的概率显著增加[分别为 HR 1.714 (1.214-2.420) 和 HR 3.410 (1.309-8.880)]。IST+TE与随访结束时出现PR或OR的可能性增加3至4倍相关[HR分别为2.575(1.679-3.950)和HR 4.768(2.434-9.337)]。使用伪随机方法进行的分析也得出了类似的结果。结论。TE对高危IgAN患者的缓解诱导可能有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1