Prevalence and Angiographic Outcomes of Rescue Intracranial Stenting in Large Vessel Occlusion Following Stroke Thrombectomy – STRATIS

Hamidreza Saber, M. Froehler, Osama O. Zaidat, Ali Aziz‐Sultan, R. Klucznik, J. Saver, N. Sanossian, Frank R Hellinger, Dileep R. Yavagal, Tom L Yao, Reza Jahan, Diogo C. Haussen, Raul G. Nogueira, N. Mueller-Kronast, David S. Liebeskind
{"title":"Prevalence and Angiographic Outcomes of Rescue Intracranial Stenting in Large Vessel Occlusion Following Stroke Thrombectomy – STRATIS","authors":"Hamidreza Saber, M. Froehler, Osama O. Zaidat, Ali Aziz‐Sultan, R. Klucznik, J. Saver, N. Sanossian, Frank R Hellinger, Dileep R. Yavagal, Tom L Yao, Reza Jahan, Diogo C. Haussen, Raul G. Nogueira, N. Mueller-Kronast, David S. Liebeskind","doi":"10.1161/svin.124.001378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Large vessel occlusion secondary to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD‐LVO) has an estimated prevalence of 7% to30%. There is a large variation in the use of intracranial rescue stenting in interventional practice. We aimed to characterize the frequency and characteristics of intracranial rescue stenting in a large cohort of endovascular therapy for stroke.\n \n \n \n The Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Stroke Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke (STRATIS) angiography core lab adjudicated the location of the occlusion, hyperdense vessel sign on initial imaging, the use of angioplasty and stenting, and imaging outcomes following endovascular therapy. Underlying cause of stroke was categorized into intracranial atherosclerosis, cardioembolic, and other subtypes. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between intracranial rescue stenting and imaging outcomes including intracranial hemorrhage, and arterial reperfusion using expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction reperfusion score in patients with ICAD‐LVO.\n \n \n \n \n Among 978 patients with LVO stroke undergoing endovascular therapy, 91 (9.3%) patients had ICAD‐LVO. Baseline hyperdense vessel sign was observed among 44 (62.7%) with ICAD versus 178 (68.2%) with cardioembolic LVO (\n P\n =\n0.4). Final successful reperfusion (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b50 or more) was significantly lower among ICAD‐LVO as compared with cardioembolic‐LVO (74.2% versus 87.5%;\n P\n = 0.007). Intracranial rescue stenting was used among 14/665 (2.1%) of patients with LVO (5 ICA terminus, 7 M1 middle cerebral artery, 1 M2 middle cerebral artery, 1 proximal basilar artery). Among 14 intracranial rescue stenting cases, 5/70 (7.1%) belonged to the ICAD group, 3/261 (1.1%) cardioembolic group, and 6/334 (1.8%) in other or undetermined group. Successful reperfusion following rescue stenting was achieved in all cases with ICAD‐LVO. Among ICAD‐LVO, the rate of 24 hours symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0% with acute intracranial stenting versus 7.7% in the nonstenting subgroup.\n \n \n \n \n In STRATIS, nearly 1 of every 11 thrombectomies were performed in patients with underlying ICAD, among whom 7.1% underwent rescue intracranial stenting concomitant with thrombectomy. Acute intracranial stenting as rescue therapy in ICAD‐LVO was associated with favorable angiographic outcomes and low symptomatic hemorrhage rates.\n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":" 90","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.124.001378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large vessel occlusion secondary to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD‐LVO) has an estimated prevalence of 7% to30%. There is a large variation in the use of intracranial rescue stenting in interventional practice. We aimed to characterize the frequency and characteristics of intracranial rescue stenting in a large cohort of endovascular therapy for stroke. The Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Stroke Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke (STRATIS) angiography core lab adjudicated the location of the occlusion, hyperdense vessel sign on initial imaging, the use of angioplasty and stenting, and imaging outcomes following endovascular therapy. Underlying cause of stroke was categorized into intracranial atherosclerosis, cardioembolic, and other subtypes. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between intracranial rescue stenting and imaging outcomes including intracranial hemorrhage, and arterial reperfusion using expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction reperfusion score in patients with ICAD‐LVO. Among 978 patients with LVO stroke undergoing endovascular therapy, 91 (9.3%) patients had ICAD‐LVO. Baseline hyperdense vessel sign was observed among 44 (62.7%) with ICAD versus 178 (68.2%) with cardioembolic LVO ( P = 0.4). Final successful reperfusion (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b50 or more) was significantly lower among ICAD‐LVO as compared with cardioembolic‐LVO (74.2% versus 87.5%; P = 0.007). Intracranial rescue stenting was used among 14/665 (2.1%) of patients with LVO (5 ICA terminus, 7 M1 middle cerebral artery, 1 M2 middle cerebral artery, 1 proximal basilar artery). Among 14 intracranial rescue stenting cases, 5/70 (7.1%) belonged to the ICAD group, 3/261 (1.1%) cardioembolic group, and 6/334 (1.8%) in other or undetermined group. Successful reperfusion following rescue stenting was achieved in all cases with ICAD‐LVO. Among ICAD‐LVO, the rate of 24 hours symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0% with acute intracranial stenting versus 7.7% in the nonstenting subgroup. In STRATIS, nearly 1 of every 11 thrombectomies were performed in patients with underlying ICAD, among whom 7.1% underwent rescue intracranial stenting concomitant with thrombectomy. Acute intracranial stenting as rescue therapy in ICAD‐LVO was associated with favorable angiographic outcomes and low symptomatic hemorrhage rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中血栓清除术后大血管闭塞时颅内支架置入术的应用率和血管造影结果 - STRATIS
继发于颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病的大血管闭塞(ICAD-LVO)的发病率估计为 7% 至 30%。在介入治疗实践中,颅内救援支架的使用存在很大差异。我们的目的是在一大批接受过脑卒中血管内治疗的患者中描述颅内救援支架术的频率和特点。 使用卒中设备治疗急性缺血性卒中患者的系统评估(STRATIS)血管造影核心实验室对闭塞位置、初始成像的高密度血管征象、血管成形术和支架术的使用以及血管内治疗后的成像结果进行了判定。中风的根本原因分为颅内动脉粥样硬化、心栓塞和其他亚型。统计分析研究了 ICAD-LVO 患者颅内救治支架置入术与影像学结果(包括颅内出血)和动脉再灌注(使用扩大的脑梗塞溶栓再灌注评分)之间的关系。 在接受血管内治疗的 978 例 LVO 中风患者中,有 91 例(9.3%)患者患有 ICAD-LVO。44例(62.7%)ICAD患者与178例(68.2%)心源性栓塞性LVO患者相比,观察到基线高密度血管征(P =0.4)。ICAD-LVO患者的最终再灌注成功率(脑梗塞溶栓治疗扩大2b50或以上)明显低于心栓性-LVO患者(74.2%对87.5%;P = 0.007)。14/665(2.1%)例 LVO 患者使用了颅内救援支架(5 例 ICA 终点、7 例 M1 大脑中动脉、1 例 M2 大脑中动脉、1 例基底动脉近端)。在14例颅内抢救性支架植入术病例中,5/70(7.1%)属于ICAD组,3/261(1.1%)属于心源性栓塞组,6/334(1.8%)属于其他或未确定组。所有ICAD-LVO病例在接受支架植入手术后都成功实现了再灌注。在ICAD-LVO患者中,急性颅内支架置入术后24小时无症状颅内出血率为0%,而非支架置入术亚组为7.7%。 在 STRATIS 中,每 11 例血栓切除术中就有近 1 例是在有基础 ICAD 的患者中进行的,其中 7.1% 的患者在接受血栓切除术的同时还接受了颅内支架置入术。急性颅内支架植入术作为ICAD-LVO的抢救疗法,具有良好的血管造影效果和较低的症状性出血率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1