Dark patterns: EU's regulatory efforts

IF 1.5 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Security and Privacy Pub Date : 2024-07-07 DOI:10.1002/spy2.441
Johanna Herman
{"title":"Dark patterns: EU's regulatory efforts","authors":"Johanna Herman","doi":"10.1002/spy2.441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a world where technology is rapidly advancing, regulation of dark pattern practices has become a topic of increasing importance. Society has become somewhat desensitized to these deceptive online practices that manipulate users into taking actions, which are not in their best interests, such as difficulty unsubscribing from a service, prominence of consent buttons, and countless other advanced tactics to obscure transparency. However, these ongoing practices harm both the individual user, and society in general, by impeding informed decision‐making. This Article addresses the European Union's leading efforts to tackle dark pattern practices, and in particular, addresses the numerous legislative acts which have been enacted to regulate and eliminate them. The acts explored in this Article include the General Data Protection Regulation, the Uniform Commercial Practices Directive, the Data Act, the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act, the Amendment to the Directive on Financial Services Contracts Concluded at a Distance, and the Artificial Intelligence Act. This Article then discusses the interplay between the numerous acts, and the resulting ambiguities and overlap which have led to a level of regulatory redundancy. This Article examines not only the difficulty in interpretation of the various acts, but additionally, explores the issues which arise in implementation from a jurisdictional perspective. Further, this Article suggests potential solutions to address the fragmented legislation, including a hybrid form of harmonization, as well as methods for consolidation and centralization.","PeriodicalId":29939,"journal":{"name":"Security and Privacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security and Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a world where technology is rapidly advancing, regulation of dark pattern practices has become a topic of increasing importance. Society has become somewhat desensitized to these deceptive online practices that manipulate users into taking actions, which are not in their best interests, such as difficulty unsubscribing from a service, prominence of consent buttons, and countless other advanced tactics to obscure transparency. However, these ongoing practices harm both the individual user, and society in general, by impeding informed decision‐making. This Article addresses the European Union's leading efforts to tackle dark pattern practices, and in particular, addresses the numerous legislative acts which have been enacted to regulate and eliminate them. The acts explored in this Article include the General Data Protection Regulation, the Uniform Commercial Practices Directive, the Data Act, the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act, the Amendment to the Directive on Financial Services Contracts Concluded at a Distance, and the Artificial Intelligence Act. This Article then discusses the interplay between the numerous acts, and the resulting ambiguities and overlap which have led to a level of regulatory redundancy. This Article examines not only the difficulty in interpretation of the various acts, but additionally, explores the issues which arise in implementation from a jurisdictional perspective. Further, this Article suggests potential solutions to address the fragmented legislation, including a hybrid form of harmonization, as well as methods for consolidation and centralization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑暗模式:欧盟的监管工作
在技术飞速发展的今天,对暗箱操作的监管已成为一个日益重要的话题。社会对这些操纵用户采取不符合其最大利益的行动的欺骗性网络行为已变得有些麻木,如取消订阅服务的困难、同意按钮的突出以及其他无数掩盖透明度的先进策略。然而,这些持续不断的做法既损害了个人用户,也妨碍了整个社会做出知情决策。本文介绍了欧盟在应对暗箱操作方面所做的领先努力,特别是为规范和消除暗箱操作而颁布的众多立法法案。本文探讨的法案包括《通用数据保护条例》、《统一商业惯例指令》、《数据法》、《数字市场法》、《数字服务法》、《远程签订金融服务合同指令修正案》和《人工智能法》。本文随后讨论了众多法案之间的相互作用,以及由此产生的含糊不清和重叠现象,这些现象导致了一定程度的监管冗余。本文不仅探讨了各种法案在解释上的困难,还从管辖权的角度探讨了在实施过程中出现的问题。此外,本文还提出了解决立法分散问题的潜在方案,包括混合形式的统一以及合并和集中的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
IoT malware detection using static and dynamic analysis techniques: A systematic literature review An approach for mitigating cognitive load in password management by integrating QR codes and steganography Cryptographic methods for secured communication in SDN‐based VANETs: A performance analysis Exploring security and privacy enhancement technologies in the Internet of Things: A comprehensive review Research on privacy leakage of celebrity's ID card number based on real‐name authentication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1