A - 18 Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition (SCAT5) Normative Reference Values for Professional Men’s Rugby League Players

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae052.18
J. E. Maietta, D. A. Terry, D. R. Lakisa, G. L. Iverson, A. J. Gardner
{"title":"A - 18 Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition (SCAT5) Normative Reference Values for Professional Men’s Rugby League Players","authors":"J. E. Maietta, D. A. Terry, D. R. Lakisa, G. L. Iverson, A. J. Gardner","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition (SCAT5) is a standardized assessment that is administered to athletes at preseason and after suspected concussion. We provide normative reference values for men’s professional National Rugby League (NRL) players.\n \n \n \n Baseline SCAT5 scores were obtained from 1005 NRL players during the 2018 and 2019 seasons (Mage = 25.9). Players self-identified whether they considered their cultural heritage or ethnicity to be “Pasifika (Pacific Islander) or Māori” (n = 243; 24.2%) or “Indigenous Australian” (n = 82; 8.2%). Those who identified as being from any other race, ethnicity, or cultural heritage were combined into a single group (n = 680; 67.7%). We provide normative values for the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), Symptom Evaluation (i.e., symptom severity and symptom number), and the Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS).\n \n \n \n There were no significant differences between the cultural heritage or ethnicity groups for SAC total scores, symptom severity or number, or mBESS errors (p’s > 0.05). The median SAC score was 27 (IQR = 25–28), median symptom severity was 0 (IQR = 0–2), median symptom number was 0 (IQR = 0–1), and median mBESS error score was 3 (IQR = 1–5). SAC scores of <23 and mBESS errors >7 were uncommon in the sample while SAC scores of 26–30 and mBESS scores of 0–4 were considered within normal expectations (WNE). Reporting >4/22 symptoms and > 6/132 severity was uncommon while 0–1 symptoms and 0–1 symptom severity was WNE.\n \n \n \n Normative reference values for the SCAT5 are provided for a sample of elite professional men’s rugby league players from Australia.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition (SCAT5) is a standardized assessment that is administered to athletes at preseason and after suspected concussion. We provide normative reference values for men’s professional National Rugby League (NRL) players. Baseline SCAT5 scores were obtained from 1005 NRL players during the 2018 and 2019 seasons (Mage = 25.9). Players self-identified whether they considered their cultural heritage or ethnicity to be “Pasifika (Pacific Islander) or Māori” (n = 243; 24.2%) or “Indigenous Australian” (n = 82; 8.2%). Those who identified as being from any other race, ethnicity, or cultural heritage were combined into a single group (n = 680; 67.7%). We provide normative values for the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), Symptom Evaluation (i.e., symptom severity and symptom number), and the Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS). There were no significant differences between the cultural heritage or ethnicity groups for SAC total scores, symptom severity or number, or mBESS errors (p’s > 0.05). The median SAC score was 27 (IQR = 25–28), median symptom severity was 0 (IQR = 0–2), median symptom number was 0 (IQR = 0–1), and median mBESS error score was 3 (IQR = 1–5). SAC scores of <23 and mBESS errors >7 were uncommon in the sample while SAC scores of 26–30 and mBESS scores of 0–4 were considered within normal expectations (WNE). Reporting >4/22 symptoms and > 6/132 severity was uncommon while 0–1 symptoms and 0–1 symptom severity was WNE. Normative reference values for the SCAT5 are provided for a sample of elite professional men’s rugby league players from Australia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A - 18 运动脑震荡评估工具-第 5 版 (SCAT5) 职业男子橄榄球联盟球员的规范参考值
运动脑震荡评估工具-第 5 版(SCAT5)是一项标准化评估,在季前赛和疑似脑震荡后对运动员进行评估。我们为男子职业橄榄球联盟(NRL)球员提供了标准参考值。 我们从 2018 和 2019 赛季的 1005 名 NRL 球员(Mage = 25.9)中获得了 SCAT5 的基线分数。球员们自我认同他们是否认为自己的文化遗产或种族是 "太平洋岛民(Pasifika)或毛利人"(n = 243;24.2%)或 "澳大利亚土著"(n = 82;8.2%)。那些被认定为来自任何其他种族、民族或文化遗产的人被合并为一个群体(n = 680;67.7%)。我们提供了脑震荡标准化评估(SAC)、症状评估(即症状严重程度和症状数量)和改良平衡失误评分系统(mBESS)的标准值。 在 SAC 总分、症状严重程度或数量或 mBESS 误差方面,文化遗产组或种族组之间没有明显差异(P>0.05)。SAC 评分中位数为 27(IQR = 25-28),症状严重程度中位数为 0(IQR = 0-2),症状数量中位数为 0(IQR = 0-1),mBESS 错误评分中位数为 3(IQR = 1-5)。在样本中,SAC 得分为 7 的情况并不常见,而 SAC 得分为 26-30 和 mBESS 得分为 0-4 的情况则被视为在正常预期范围内(WNE)。报告症状>4/22和症状严重程度>6/132的情况并不常见,而报告症状0-1和症状严重程度0-1的情况属于WNE。 SCAT5 的正常参考值是以澳大利亚男子橄榄球联赛精英职业球员为样本提供的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Executive Functions are Independently Associated with Cognitive Dispersion in HIV Disease. Accuracy of Reaction Time Measurement on Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric UltraMobile. Examining Food-Specific and General Inhibitory Control and Working Memory as Moderators of Relations Between Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Eating Pathology in Adults With Overweight/Obesity: A Preregistered, Cross-Sectional Study. Task-Based Attentional Control: The Role of Anxiety and Age. A Systematic Review to Explore a Neuropsychological Profile that Predates Anorexia Nervosa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1