A - 57 Relationship between Exercise Participation and Cognitive/Emotional Symptom Endorsement in Older Former College Athletes

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae052.57
L. Shurtz, A. Datoc, G. D. Sanders, S. Bunt, N. Didehbani, J. Schaffert, C. LoBue, C. Cullum
{"title":"A - 57 Relationship between Exercise Participation and Cognitive/Emotional Symptom Endorsement in Older Former College Athletes","authors":"L. Shurtz, A. Datoc, G. D. Sanders, S. Bunt, N. Didehbani, J. Schaffert, C. LoBue, C. Cullum","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Exercise participation has been associated with improved physical health, cognition, and psychological well-being as well as reduced risk for chronic illness and mortality. The effects of exercise participation in former athletes are less understood; this study investigated the relationship between current exercise participation and cognitive/emotional symptoms in former college athletes.\n \n \n \n Former college athletes aged 50–87 (N = 597, 44.2% female) completed the College Level Aging Athlete Study (CLEAATS) survey including the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI), Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified (TICS-m), and self-reported weekly exercise involvement, classified as aerobic exercise (e.g., jogging/cycling), anaerobic exercise (e.g., weightlifting), and “other wellness activities”(e.g., yoga/meditation). Four multiple linear regression models investigated whether current exercise participation predicted mood and cognition, adjusting for demographic factors.\n \n \n \n Overall models for PHQ-8 [F(6,590) = 8.87, p < 0.001], GAD-7 [F(6,590) = 4.87, p < 0.001], CFI [F(6,590) = 3.45, p = 0.002], and TICS-m [F(6,590) = 15.99, p < 0.001] were significant. Individually, aerobic exercise was a significant predictor of PHQ-8 (b = −0.35, p < 0.001), GAD-7 (b = −0.18, p = 0.007), CFI (b = −0.12, p = 0.021), and TICS-m (b = 0.18, p = 0.022) scores, such that more exercise predicted lower emotional/cognitive difficulties. Engagement in “other wellness activities”was significantly associated with higher TICS-m (b = 0.18, p = 0.024) scores. Anaerobic exercise was not a significant predictor in any model.\n \n \n \n Consistent with research in other populations, participation in aerobic exercise predicted better cognitive/emotional functioning in former college athletes. Involvement in other forms of exercise did not consistently predict greater functioning, though “other wellness activities”was associated with better objective cognition. Results emphasize the importance of recommending aerobic exercise for former athletes.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.57","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exercise participation has been associated with improved physical health, cognition, and psychological well-being as well as reduced risk for chronic illness and mortality. The effects of exercise participation in former athletes are less understood; this study investigated the relationship between current exercise participation and cognitive/emotional symptoms in former college athletes. Former college athletes aged 50–87 (N = 597, 44.2% female) completed the College Level Aging Athlete Study (CLEAATS) survey including the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI), Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified (TICS-m), and self-reported weekly exercise involvement, classified as aerobic exercise (e.g., jogging/cycling), anaerobic exercise (e.g., weightlifting), and “other wellness activities”(e.g., yoga/meditation). Four multiple linear regression models investigated whether current exercise participation predicted mood and cognition, adjusting for demographic factors. Overall models for PHQ-8 [F(6,590) = 8.87, p < 0.001], GAD-7 [F(6,590) = 4.87, p < 0.001], CFI [F(6,590) = 3.45, p = 0.002], and TICS-m [F(6,590) = 15.99, p < 0.001] were significant. Individually, aerobic exercise was a significant predictor of PHQ-8 (b = −0.35, p < 0.001), GAD-7 (b = −0.18, p = 0.007), CFI (b = −0.12, p = 0.021), and TICS-m (b = 0.18, p = 0.022) scores, such that more exercise predicted lower emotional/cognitive difficulties. Engagement in “other wellness activities”was significantly associated with higher TICS-m (b = 0.18, p = 0.024) scores. Anaerobic exercise was not a significant predictor in any model. Consistent with research in other populations, participation in aerobic exercise predicted better cognitive/emotional functioning in former college athletes. Involvement in other forms of exercise did not consistently predict greater functioning, though “other wellness activities”was associated with better objective cognition. Results emphasize the importance of recommending aerobic exercise for former athletes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A - 57 老年退役大学生运动员参与运动与认知/情绪症状认可之间的关系
参加运动与改善身体健康、认知和心理健康以及降低慢性疾病和死亡风险有关。本研究调查了退役大学生运动员目前参加运动与认知/情绪症状之间的关系。 年龄在 50-87 岁之间的退役大学生运动员(N = 597,44.2% 为女性)完成了大学生老龄化运动员研究(CLEAATS)调查,包括患者健康问卷(PHQ-8)、广泛性焦虑症(GAD-7)、认知功能问卷(CFI)、认知状况电话访谈(TICS-m),以及自我报告的每周运动参与情况,分为有氧运动(如慢跑/骑自行车)、有氧运动(如跑步/骑自行车)、认知功能问卷(CFI)和认知状况电话访谈(TICS-m)、有氧运动(如慢跑/骑自行车)、无氧运动(如举重)和 "其他健康活动"(如瑜伽/冥想)。四个多元线性回归模型研究了当前参与运动是否能预测情绪和认知,并对人口统计学因素进行了调整。 PHQ-8[F(6,590) = 8.87, p < 0.001]、GAD-7[F(6,590) = 4.87, p < 0.001]、CFI[F(6,590) = 3.45, p = 0.002]和TICS-m[F(6,590) = 15.99, p < 0.001]的整体模型显著。就个体而言,有氧运动对 PHQ-8 (b = -0.35, p < 0.001)、GAD-7 (b = -0.18, p = 0.007)、CFI (b = -0.12, p = 0.021)和 TICS-m (b = 0.18, p = 0.022)得分有显著的预测作用,因此运动越多,情绪/认知困难越低。参与 "其他健康活动 "与较高的 TICS-m (b = 0.18,p = 0.024)得分显著相关。在任何模型中,无氧运动都不是一个重要的预测因素。 与其他人群的研究结果一致,参与有氧运动可预测退役大学生运动员的认知/情感功能。虽然 "其他健康活动 "与更好的客观认知相关,但参与其他形式的运动并不能持续预测更好的功能。研究结果强调了向退役运动员推荐有氧运动的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Executive Functions are Independently Associated with Cognitive Dispersion in HIV Disease. Accuracy of Reaction Time Measurement on Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric UltraMobile. Examining Food-Specific and General Inhibitory Control and Working Memory as Moderators of Relations Between Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Eating Pathology in Adults With Overweight/Obesity: A Preregistered, Cross-Sectional Study. Task-Based Attentional Control: The Role of Anxiety and Age. A Systematic Review to Explore a Neuropsychological Profile that Predates Anorexia Nervosa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1