A - 08 Mental Health and Identity in Digital vs. Physical Sports (Individual vs. Team Dynamics)

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae052.08
E. Clise, A. Logalbo
{"title":"A - 08 Mental Health and Identity in Digital vs. Physical Sports (Individual vs. Team Dynamics)","authors":"E. Clise, A. Logalbo","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To investigate how digital (e-sports) vs traditional (physical) sports affect athletes’mental health outcomes and identity perceptions.\n \n \n \n 39 e-sports athletes (37 male, 2 female, aged 17–23) and 188 physical athletes (94 male, 94 female, aged 17–23) were administered the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale-Plus (AIMS-Plus), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7th Edition (GAD-7) questionnaire during baseline concussion testing. The AIMS-Plus questionnaire contains a Role Identity Rating, where athletes rate the importance of family, friendships, athletics, academics, religion, and romance in their lives (0–100).\n \n \n \n No significant differences in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 totals were observed between e-sports and physical athletes [p > 0.05]. E-sports athletes rated athletic and family identity lower than physical sports athletes (p = 0.015). Among physical sports athletes, higher athletic and family identity ratings were associated with lower PHQ-9 scores (p = 0.015), contrasting with nonsignificant findings in e-sports athletes. Among physical sports athletes, those participating in individual sports endorsed more symptoms on both GAD-7 and PHQ-9 than team sports athletes (p = 0.009; p = 0.045). Furthermore, individual sports athletes also rated family and athletic identity lower than team sports athletes (p < 0.001; p = 0.041).\n \n \n \n Sport modality (digital or physical) does not affect mental health scores, suggesting that other factors influence student-athlete emotional functioning. Stronger athletic and family-role identity may serve as protective factors against depression for physical athletes. Although e-sports athletes rated athletic and family-roles lower, they did not appear to be more likely to experience emotional distress. Findings have implications for tailoring treatment to different types of athletes.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate how digital (e-sports) vs traditional (physical) sports affect athletes’mental health outcomes and identity perceptions. 39 e-sports athletes (37 male, 2 female, aged 17–23) and 188 physical athletes (94 male, 94 female, aged 17–23) were administered the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale-Plus (AIMS-Plus), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7th Edition (GAD-7) questionnaire during baseline concussion testing. The AIMS-Plus questionnaire contains a Role Identity Rating, where athletes rate the importance of family, friendships, athletics, academics, religion, and romance in their lives (0–100). No significant differences in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 totals were observed between e-sports and physical athletes [p > 0.05]. E-sports athletes rated athletic and family identity lower than physical sports athletes (p = 0.015). Among physical sports athletes, higher athletic and family identity ratings were associated with lower PHQ-9 scores (p = 0.015), contrasting with nonsignificant findings in e-sports athletes. Among physical sports athletes, those participating in individual sports endorsed more symptoms on both GAD-7 and PHQ-9 than team sports athletes (p = 0.009; p = 0.045). Furthermore, individual sports athletes also rated family and athletic identity lower than team sports athletes (p < 0.001; p = 0.041). Sport modality (digital or physical) does not affect mental health scores, suggesting that other factors influence student-athlete emotional functioning. Stronger athletic and family-role identity may serve as protective factors against depression for physical athletes. Although e-sports athletes rated athletic and family-roles lower, they did not appear to be more likely to experience emotional distress. Findings have implications for tailoring treatment to different types of athletes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A - 08 数字运动与体育运动中的心理健康与身份认同(个人与团队动态)
研究数字(电子竞技)与传统(体育)运动如何影响运动员的心理健康结果和身份认知。 在基线脑震荡测试期间,对 39 名电子竞技运动员(37 名男性,2 名女性,年龄在 17-23 岁之间)和 188 名体育运动员(94 名男性,94 名女性,年龄在 17-23 岁之间)进行了运动身份测量量表-Plus(AIMS-Plus)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和第 7 版广泛性焦虑症(GAD-7)问卷调查。AIMS-Plus 问卷包含一个角色认同评分,让运动员对家庭、友谊、体育、学术、宗教和恋爱在他们生活中的重要性进行评分(0-100)。 电子竞技运动员和体能运动员的 PHQ-9 和 GAD-7 总分没有明显差异[P > 0.05]。电子竞技运动员对运动和家庭认同的评分低于体育运动员(P = 0.015)。在体育运动员中,较高的运动和家庭认同评分与较低的 PHQ-9 分数相关(p = 0.015),而在电子竞技运动员中这一结果并不显著。在体育运动员中,参加个人运动的运动员比参加团队运动的运动员在 GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 上表现出更多的症状(p = 0.009;p = 0.045)。此外,个人运动项目运动员对家庭和运动身份的评价也低于团队运动项目运动员(p < 0.001; p = 0.041)。 运动方式(数字或物理)并不影响心理健康得分,这表明其他因素影响着学生运动员的情绪功能。对于体能类运动员来说,较强的运动和家庭角色认同可能是抑郁的保护因素。虽然电子竞技运动员对运动和家庭角色的评价较低,但他们似乎并不更容易受到情绪困扰。研究结果对针对不同类型的运动员进行治疗具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Transdiagnostic Attentional Deficits Are Associated with Depressive and Externalizing Symptoms in Children and Adolescents with Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Pediatric neuropsychological assessment in Southeast Asia: Current status and future directions with Vietnam as a scoping review case example. Normative Data for the Famous People Fluency Test in the Adult French-Quebec Population and Validation Study in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. Correction to: Long-Term Effects of Intensive Rehabilitation on Memory Functions in Acquired Brain-Damaged Patients. The Utility of a Novel Neuropsychological Measurement to Analyze Event-Related Attentional Behaviors among Young Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-a Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1