M. Ellis-Stockley, J. Adler, B. Forbes, K. Summers, T. Tupou, H. Eve, R. Hirst
{"title":"A - 23 Interpretation Consideration: Serial Baseline Performances on Core Executive Function Measures in Healthy Youth Athletes","authors":"M. Ellis-Stockley, J. Adler, B. Forbes, K. Summers, T. Tupou, H. Eve, R. Hirst","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Sports participation in youth has demonstrated better core executive function (EF) abilities compared to those who do not participate (Contreras-Osorio et al., 2021). However, previous research has not observed a pattern of improvement across all EF abilities (M√∂hring et al., 2022), indicating EF development in childhood is not linear (Anderson, 2002). The present study compared baseline scores of cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibition at two timepoints among youth athletes.\n \n \n \n Data from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Letter-Number Sequencing (cognitive flexibility), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Fourth Edition Working Memory Index, and Golden Stroop Color-Word Inhibition test were analyzed in a sample of youth athletes (n = 32), aged 8–16 years. Mean age difference between time 1 and 2 was 1.86 years. Paired-samples t-test examined the difference in core EF scores at two timepoints.\n \n \n \n Performance on a measure of inhibition significantly improved over time (p = 0.02; effect size [d] = 0.43). Performances on measures of working memory and cognitive flexibility did not significantly differ over time (p = 0.16 and p = 0.61, respectively).\n \n \n \n Healthy youth athletes performed significantly better only on a measure of inhibition at baseline two than baseline one, suggesting clinicians should anticipate variation in scores when re-examining core EF abilities after two years. Further, clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting variation in baseline scores because it could be due to sports participation. Future research should investigate whether inhibition continues to improve overtime and whether significant changes are observed in other core EFs.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sports participation in youth has demonstrated better core executive function (EF) abilities compared to those who do not participate (Contreras-Osorio et al., 2021). However, previous research has not observed a pattern of improvement across all EF abilities (Möhring et al., 2022), indicating EF development in childhood is not linear (Anderson, 2002). The present study compared baseline scores of cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibition at two timepoints among youth athletes.
Data from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Letter-Number Sequencing (cognitive flexibility), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Fourth Edition Working Memory Index, and Golden Stroop Color-Word Inhibition test were analyzed in a sample of youth athletes (n = 32), aged 8–16 years. Mean age difference between time 1 and 2 was 1.86 years. Paired-samples t-test examined the difference in core EF scores at two timepoints.
Performance on a measure of inhibition significantly improved over time (p = 0.02; effect size [d] = 0.43). Performances on measures of working memory and cognitive flexibility did not significantly differ over time (p = 0.16 and p = 0.61, respectively).
Healthy youth athletes performed significantly better only on a measure of inhibition at baseline two than baseline one, suggesting clinicians should anticipate variation in scores when re-examining core EF abilities after two years. Further, clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting variation in baseline scores because it could be due to sports participation. Future research should investigate whether inhibition continues to improve overtime and whether significant changes are observed in other core EFs.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.