A Comparative Study to Assess Post-COVID Fatigue and its Functional Limitations

Maria M. Ali, Asma Arman, Sahar Zuberi, Shahameen Aqeel, Shahjabeen
{"title":"A Comparative Study to Assess Post-COVID Fatigue and its Functional\nLimitations","authors":"Maria M. Ali, Asma Arman, Sahar Zuberi, Shahameen Aqeel, Shahjabeen","doi":"10.2174/0126667975301718240625111222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis work aimed to study the difference in the level of fatigue perception between\ncases and controls, who did not have COVID-19. This study sought to establish the impact of\nseverity of infection with fatigue scores on the quality of life.\n\n\n\nThis observational case-control study, recruiting 165 participants, both males and females,\nfrom Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan, started from August 2022 to October\n2023 after obtaining their consent. A total of 65 COVID-positive with 21.5% hospitalized and 78.5%\nnon-hospitalized subjects were included. Post-COVID fatigue among the participants was compared\nusing the validated Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11), and WHOQOL\nscale.\n\n\n\nParticipants in all groups reported fatigue on the Fatigue Severity Scale with Covid-positive\n(38.25 ±12.15) and Covid-negative (33.75±11.28) rate, with a significant p-value (0.031). According\nto CFQ, no significant difference (p=0.91) was found between fatigue scores of Covid positive and\nnegative. However, a significant (p=0. 016) difference was observed between Covid-positive hospitalized\n(4.37±0.33) and non-hospitalized (1.98 ±0.22) subjects. QOL scores in different domains,\nincluding QOL General Health (7.18±1.54), physical (20.38±3.51), psychological (46.33±7.05), and\nsocial (9.98±1.94), were all significant (p=0.00) when compared between Covid positives and negatives.\n\n\n\nThe study revealed that post-covid survivors experienced fatigue, which imposed limitations\non different aspects of life, which was different from the fatigue of non-affected individuals.\n","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975301718240625111222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work aimed to study the difference in the level of fatigue perception between cases and controls, who did not have COVID-19. This study sought to establish the impact of severity of infection with fatigue scores on the quality of life. This observational case-control study, recruiting 165 participants, both males and females, from Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan, started from August 2022 to October 2023 after obtaining their consent. A total of 65 COVID-positive with 21.5% hospitalized and 78.5% non-hospitalized subjects were included. Post-COVID fatigue among the participants was compared using the validated Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11), and WHOQOL scale. Participants in all groups reported fatigue on the Fatigue Severity Scale with Covid-positive (38.25 ±12.15) and Covid-negative (33.75±11.28) rate, with a significant p-value (0.031). According to CFQ, no significant difference (p=0.91) was found between fatigue scores of Covid positive and negative. However, a significant (p=0. 016) difference was observed between Covid-positive hospitalized (4.37±0.33) and non-hospitalized (1.98 ±0.22) subjects. QOL scores in different domains, including QOL General Health (7.18±1.54), physical (20.38±3.51), psychological (46.33±7.05), and social (9.98±1.94), were all significant (p=0.00) when compared between Covid positives and negatives. The study revealed that post-covid survivors experienced fatigue, which imposed limitations on different aspects of life, which was different from the fatigue of non-affected individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 COVID 后疲劳及其功能限制的比较研究
这项工作旨在研究未感染COVID-19的病例与对照组之间在疲劳感水平上的差异。这项观察性病例对照研究从 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 10 月,在征得巴基斯坦卡拉奇 Fazaia Ruth Pfau 医学院的 165 名男性和女性参与者的同意后开始进行。共纳入 65 名 COVID 阳性受试者,其中 21.5% 为住院受试者,78.5% 为非住院受试者。所有组别中,Covid阳性(38.25±12.15)和Covid阴性(33.75±11.28)的受试者均在疲劳严重程度量表上报告疲劳,P值显著(0.031)。根据 CFQ,Covid 阳性和阴性患者的疲劳评分无明显差异(P=0.91)。然而,在 Covid 阳性住院患者(4.37±0.33)和非住院患者(1.98±0.22)之间观察到了明显的差异(P=0.016)。Covid阳性和阴性受试者在不同领域的QOL评分,包括QOL一般健康(7.18±1.54)、身体(20.38±3.51)、心理(46.33±7.05)和社会(9.98±1.94),均有显著性差异(P=0.00)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness on the Severity of Disease: A Case-control Study in Southeastern Iran Evaluation of Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Analysis of Motivating and Hindering Factors Novel Coronavirus: An Overview of the History, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of the Pandemic COVID-19 Catastrophe, with Special Emphasis on Herbal Treatment Alternatives Spectrum of Long COVID Symptoms and Management Approaches in Europe and Latin America Identification of Epitope Against Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2: In Silico Vaccine Design Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1