Decompressive craniectomy at the National Hospital of Niamey: Prospective study of the epidemioclinical profile, indications, surgical techniques, and results in a context of limited resources

O. I. Hamma, Aminat Kelani, Souleymane Mahamadou Ango, Tidjani Mahamat Hissene, Salifou Mahamane Mobarak, Yahouza Boka Tounga, Assoumane Ibrahim Issa, G. Dechambenoit
{"title":"Decompressive craniectomy at the National Hospital of Niamey: Prospective study of the epidemioclinical profile, indications, surgical techniques, and results in a context of limited resources","authors":"O. I. Hamma, Aminat Kelani, Souleymane Mahamadou Ango, Tidjani Mahamat Hissene, Salifou Mahamane Mobarak, Yahouza Boka Tounga, Assoumane Ibrahim Issa, G. Dechambenoit","doi":"10.25259/sni_169_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nDecompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical technique that is gaining renewed interest due to the worldwide resurgence of head injuries. We aimed to analyze the quality of management and prognosis of patients who underwent this surgery in the context of limited resources.\n\n\n\nThis was a prospective, longitudinal, descriptive, and analytical study following STROBE, lasting 36 months at the National Hospital of Niamey in patients who had undergone DC. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.\n\n\n\nDuring our study, we collected 74 cases of DC. The mean age was 32.04 years (10–75 years), with male predominance (91.89%). DC was mainly performed following head trauma (95.95%), the main cause of which was road traffic accidents (76%; 54/71). On admission, most patients presented with altered consciousness (95.95%) and pupillary abnormalities (62.16%). The average time between brain damage and brain scan was 31.28 h, with parenchymal contusion being the most frequent lesion (90.54%). The majority of patients (94.59%) underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy. Postoperative complications accounted for 71.62% of all cases, with 33.78% resulting in death. Among survivors, 55.10% had neurological sequelae at the last consultation (27/49). The main factors associated with the risk of death and morbidity were a Glasgow coma score ≤8, pupillary abnormality on admission, the presence of signs of brain engagement, and a long admission delay.\n\n\n\nOur study shows that the impact of limited resources on our care is moderate. Future research will concentrate on long-term monitoring, particularly focusing on the psychosocial reintegration of patients post-DC.\n","PeriodicalId":38981,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology International","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_169_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical technique that is gaining renewed interest due to the worldwide resurgence of head injuries. We aimed to analyze the quality of management and prognosis of patients who underwent this surgery in the context of limited resources. This was a prospective, longitudinal, descriptive, and analytical study following STROBE, lasting 36 months at the National Hospital of Niamey in patients who had undergone DC. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. During our study, we collected 74 cases of DC. The mean age was 32.04 years (10–75 years), with male predominance (91.89%). DC was mainly performed following head trauma (95.95%), the main cause of which was road traffic accidents (76%; 54/71). On admission, most patients presented with altered consciousness (95.95%) and pupillary abnormalities (62.16%). The average time between brain damage and brain scan was 31.28 h, with parenchymal contusion being the most frequent lesion (90.54%). The majority of patients (94.59%) underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy. Postoperative complications accounted for 71.62% of all cases, with 33.78% resulting in death. Among survivors, 55.10% had neurological sequelae at the last consultation (27/49). The main factors associated with the risk of death and morbidity were a Glasgow coma score ≤8, pupillary abnormality on admission, the presence of signs of brain engagement, and a long admission delay. Our study shows that the impact of limited resources on our care is moderate. Future research will concentrate on long-term monitoring, particularly focusing on the psychosocial reintegration of patients post-DC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼亚美国立医院的减压颅骨切除术:在资源有限的情况下对流行病临床概况、适应症、手术技术和结果进行的前瞻性研究
减压颅骨切除术(DC)是一种神经外科技术,由于全球范围内颅脑损伤的再次发生,该技术再次受到关注。我们的目的是分析在资源有限的情况下接受这种手术的患者的治疗质量和预后。这是一项前瞻性、纵向、描述性和分析性研究,在尼亚美国立医院对接受过减压开颅术的患者进行了为期 36 个月的 STROBE 治疗。在研究过程中,我们共收集了 74 例 DC 病例。平均年龄为 32.04 岁(10-75 岁),男性占多数(91.89%)。脑损伤主要发生在头部外伤后(95.95%),主要原因是道路交通事故(76%;54/71)。入院时,大多数患者表现为意识改变(95.95%)和瞳孔异常(62.16%)。从脑损伤到脑扫描的平均时间为 31.28 小时,最常见的病变是脑实质挫伤(90.54%)。大多数患者(94.59%)接受了减压性半颅骨切除术。术后并发症占所有病例的71.62%,其中33.78%导致死亡。在幸存者中,55.10%的患者(27/49)在最后一次就诊时有神经系统后遗症。与死亡和发病风险相关的主要因素是格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8分、入院时瞳孔异常、存在脑参与迹象以及入院延迟时间过长。未来的研究将集中于长期监测,特别是关注昏迷后患者的社会心理重新融入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊最新文献
Cauda equina syndrome due to posttraumatic syringomyelia in conus medullaris – A case report Patients with meningioma hemorrhage should undergo an autopsy if they die from it despite successful surgery Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of residual parasellar growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma in a patient with kissing internal carotid arteries: Technical nuances Microsurgery resection of giant cervicothoracic spinal ependymoma: Two-dimensional operative video Non-granulomatous meningoencephalitis with Balamuthia mandrillaris mimicking a tumor: First confirmed case from Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1