Revitalizing CPAP adherence: lessons from THN study in patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulators

G. Mwenge, J. Bousata, Daniel Rodenstein
{"title":"Revitalizing CPAP adherence: lessons from THN study in patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulators","authors":"G. Mwenge, J. Bousata, Daniel Rodenstein","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2024.1380373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This retrospective study aimed to address acceptance and long-term adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) treatment among non-responder patients to ImThera THN system who initially declined this therapy.We employed a structured outpatient approach to communicate THN study results, categorize initial CPAP nonadherence reasons, and encourage CPAP trials through tailored appointments. Recorded follow-ups addressed individual concerns, providing medical guidance and acknowledging person-specific challenges. Adherence data were collected using CPAP hour meters at predetermined intervals, following Belgium's social security stipulations.Between July 2014 and October 2016, eleven participants, including one woman, with prior CPAP experience (average 2 months) were enrolled. Initial non-adherence was linked to ENT or psychological factors. Ten patients agreed to CPAP trials, where interventions included changing CPAP brand, pressure adjustments, mask changes, and additional measures like cognitive-behavioral therapy and nasal spray. After 1 year, mean adherence was 6.3 ± 2 h/day, and average CPAP usage duration was 8.67 ± 2.13 years. As of November 2023, eight out of eleven patients were still actively using CPAPIn this investigation, we challenged the concept of CPAP non-adherence, highlighting evolving adherence and the significance of continuous monitoring and personalized interventions. Our findings underscore ongoing patient education, multidisciplinary support, and dynamic intervention adaptation for enhanced adherence in challenging patient populations. The results provide insights applicable to non-adherent patients with obstructive sleep apnea, emphasizing the importance of individualized care and sustained engagement for improved CPAP acceptance.","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2024.1380373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to address acceptance and long-term adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) treatment among non-responder patients to ImThera THN system who initially declined this therapy.We employed a structured outpatient approach to communicate THN study results, categorize initial CPAP nonadherence reasons, and encourage CPAP trials through tailored appointments. Recorded follow-ups addressed individual concerns, providing medical guidance and acknowledging person-specific challenges. Adherence data were collected using CPAP hour meters at predetermined intervals, following Belgium's social security stipulations.Between July 2014 and October 2016, eleven participants, including one woman, with prior CPAP experience (average 2 months) were enrolled. Initial non-adherence was linked to ENT or psychological factors. Ten patients agreed to CPAP trials, where interventions included changing CPAP brand, pressure adjustments, mask changes, and additional measures like cognitive-behavioral therapy and nasal spray. After 1 year, mean adherence was 6.3 ± 2 h/day, and average CPAP usage duration was 8.67 ± 2.13 years. As of November 2023, eight out of eleven patients were still actively using CPAPIn this investigation, we challenged the concept of CPAP non-adherence, highlighting evolving adherence and the significance of continuous monitoring and personalized interventions. Our findings underscore ongoing patient education, multidisciplinary support, and dynamic intervention adaptation for enhanced adherence in challenging patient populations. The results provide insights applicable to non-adherent patients with obstructive sleep apnea, emphasizing the importance of individualized care and sustained engagement for improved CPAP acceptance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重振 CPAP 的依从性:从舌下神经刺激器患者的 THN 研究中汲取的经验教训
这项回顾性研究旨在探讨最初拒绝接受连续气道正压 (CPAP) 治疗的 ImThera THN 系统非应答患者对该疗法的接受程度和长期坚持情况。我们采用了一种结构化门诊方法来传达 THN 研究结果,对最初不坚持 CPAP 的原因进行分类,并通过有针对性的预约鼓励患者试用 CPAP。记录的随访解决了个人的担忧,提供了医疗指导并承认了个人面临的挑战。在 2014 年 7 月至 2016 年 10 月期间,包括一名女性在内的 11 名参与者(之前有过使用 CPAP 的经历,平均使用时间为 2 个月)加入了研究。最初的不坚持与耳鼻喉科或心理因素有关。10名患者同意进行CPAP试验,干预措施包括更换CPAP品牌、调整压力、更换面罩以及认知行为疗法和鼻腔喷雾等额外措施。一年后,平均坚持时间为 6.3 ± 2 小时/天,使用 CPAP 的平均时间为 8.67 ± 2.13 年。截至 2023 年 11 月,11 名患者中有 8 名仍在积极使用 CPAP。在这项调查中,我们挑战了 CPAP 不依从性的概念,强调了不断发展的依从性以及持续监测和个性化干预的重要性。我们的研究结果强调了持续的患者教育、多学科支持和动态干预调整,以提高具有挑战性的患者群体的依从性。研究结果为非依从性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者提供了适用的见解,强调了个性化护理和持续参与对提高 CPAP 接受度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing TeleSleep at Veterans Healthcare Administration: an organizational case study of adaptation and sustainment. Editorial: Insights in sleep-related movement disorders and parasomnias Efficacy of a telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy for improving sleep and nightmares in children aged 6–17 Insomnia severity and daytime sleepiness in caregivers of advanced age Revitalizing CPAP adherence: lessons from THN study in patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1