SKILLS INDEX AS AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO MANAGING SPECIALIST QUALIFICATIONS

Yuliia Biliavska, Valentyn Biliavskyi, Yurii Umantsiv, Valerii Osetskyi
{"title":"SKILLS INDEX AS AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO MANAGING SPECIALIST QUALIFICATIONS","authors":"Yuliia Biliavska, Valentyn Biliavskyi, Yurii Umantsiv, Valerii Osetskyi","doi":"10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s conditions, we can observe distinctive features of soft and hard skills, which are presented for specialists of different professions. The purpose of the article is to develop an innovative approach to managing specialist qualifications by defining a skills index. Based on this goal, the paper solves the following research tasks of the article: - generalization of research to substantiate the characteristics and components of soft, hard, self and digital skills of a specialist; - substantiation of the conceptual foundations of the specialist skills index to determine the level of knowledge and skills. Professionals across various industries often wonder what essential skills are needed to grow and prosper in business. Debates continue about the choice between collaboration, adaptability, or professionalism with technical skills. The development of personal and professional skills through education, training and meaningful work are key factors in the economic success of the state, individual well-being and social cohesion. The methodological foundation of this study relies on a systematic approach, enabling the examination of a specialist’s skills index. To calculate this index, it’s imperative to construct a questionnaire comprising four skill groups: soft, hard, self, and digital. This will allow us to summarize the results and make calculations. Skills enumerated in the questionnaire are appraised for their importance via expert evaluation method. The list of skills and the weighting criterion should be adjusted for a particular study. The skills index of a specialist will range from a minimum of 0.5 to a maximum of 1. Lower values of this index indicate a lack of necessary skills, and it is also possible to see in which group of skills there are «bottlenecks». After assessing the skills index, specialists, experts, or employees are divided into three conventional sectors: blue, yellow, and pink. The Blue sector includes people who have a wide range of skills (the index is greater than 0.5). Once in this sector, employees receive many benefits, such as bonuses, social packages, gifts, etc. This area continues to be actively developed. The «pink sector» encompasses people with an index value below 0.5, typically representing critical limits due to minimal skill levels. The intermediate sector consists of «promising employees» who constitute potential reserves and are actively engaged in developing their personal talents and abilities. It is undeniable that a well-formed set of soft, hard, self, and digital skills in a professional activity will ensure competitiveness in the labor market not only presently but also in the future.","PeriodicalId":510932,"journal":{"name":"Academic Review","volume":" 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today’s conditions, we can observe distinctive features of soft and hard skills, which are presented for specialists of different professions. The purpose of the article is to develop an innovative approach to managing specialist qualifications by defining a skills index. Based on this goal, the paper solves the following research tasks of the article: - generalization of research to substantiate the characteristics and components of soft, hard, self and digital skills of a specialist; - substantiation of the conceptual foundations of the specialist skills index to determine the level of knowledge and skills. Professionals across various industries often wonder what essential skills are needed to grow and prosper in business. Debates continue about the choice between collaboration, adaptability, or professionalism with technical skills. The development of personal and professional skills through education, training and meaningful work are key factors in the economic success of the state, individual well-being and social cohesion. The methodological foundation of this study relies on a systematic approach, enabling the examination of a specialist’s skills index. To calculate this index, it’s imperative to construct a questionnaire comprising four skill groups: soft, hard, self, and digital. This will allow us to summarize the results and make calculations. Skills enumerated in the questionnaire are appraised for their importance via expert evaluation method. The list of skills and the weighting criterion should be adjusted for a particular study. The skills index of a specialist will range from a minimum of 0.5 to a maximum of 1. Lower values of this index indicate a lack of necessary skills, and it is also possible to see in which group of skills there are «bottlenecks». After assessing the skills index, specialists, experts, or employees are divided into three conventional sectors: blue, yellow, and pink. The Blue sector includes people who have a wide range of skills (the index is greater than 0.5). Once in this sector, employees receive many benefits, such as bonuses, social packages, gifts, etc. This area continues to be actively developed. The «pink sector» encompasses people with an index value below 0.5, typically representing critical limits due to minimal skill levels. The intermediate sector consists of «promising employees» who constitute potential reserves and are actively engaged in developing their personal talents and abilities. It is undeniable that a well-formed set of soft, hard, self, and digital skills in a professional activity will ensure competitiveness in the labor market not only presently but also in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技能指数作为管理专业资格的创新方法
在当今条件下,我们可以观察到不同专业的专家所具备的软技能和硬技能的显著特点。本文的目的是通过定义技能指数,开发一种管理专家资格的创新方法。基于这一目标,本文完成了以下研究任务:- 对研究进行概括,以证实专家的软、硬、自我和数字技能的特点和组成部分; - 证实专家技能指数的概念基础,以确定知识和技能水平。各行各业的专业人员经常想知道,企业的发展和繁荣需要哪些基本技能。关于在协作、适应能力或专业技术技能之间做出选择的争论仍在继续。通过教育、培训和有意义的工作培养个人和专业技能,是国家经济成功、个人福祉和社会凝聚力的关键因素。本研究的方法论基础依赖于一种系统的方法,从而能够检查专家的技能指数。为了计算这一指数,我们必须编制一份调查问卷,其中包括四类技能:软技能、硬技能、自我技能和数字技能。这样我们就可以对结果进行总结和计算。问卷中列举的技能将通过专家评估法对其重要性进行评价。技能清单和权重标准应根据具体研究进行调整。专家的技能指数最低为 0.5,最高为 1。该指数值越低,说明缺乏必要的技能,也可以看出哪一组技能存在 "瓶颈"。在对技能指数进行评估后,专业人员、专家或员工被划分为三个常规部门:蓝色、黄色和粉色。蓝色部门包括拥有广泛技能的人(指数大于 0.5)。一旦进入这一部门,员工就会获得许多福利,如奖金、社交礼包、礼品等。这一领域将继续得到积极发展。粉红部门 "包括指数值低于 0.5 的人员,他们通常因技能水平低而处于临界状态。中间部分包括 "有前途的员工",他们是潜在的后备力量,正在积极发展个人才能和能力。不可否认的是,在职业活动中,一套完善的软技能、硬技能、自我技能和数字技能将确保在劳动力市场上的竞争力,不仅在当前如此,在未来也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE INTEGRATION POTENTIAL OF UKRAINE’S COMPETITIVE POWER IN THE EVENT OF POSSIBLE ACCESSION TO THE EU THE EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE DOMINANT STRATEGY OF “INFLEXIBLE HIPPOS” AND THE ORGANIZATIONAL LIFE CYCLE RESEARCH ON THE ROLE OF INVESTMENTS IN ENSURING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF MACHINERY ENTERPRISES IN EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF THE PROCESSES OF ESTABLISHING BUSINESS ENTITIES IN UKRAINE COMPETITIVE BUSINESS STRATEGIES OF EU ENTERPRISES IN THE CONDITIONS OF ECONOMIC INSTABILITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1