Professional psychological qualities of Chinese medical students: theoretical models, questionnaire development, and relationship with mental health

Wenping Luo, Wenshu Fan, Yanglin Xia, Yanchun Dou, Juan Du
{"title":"Professional psychological qualities of Chinese medical students: theoretical models, questionnaire development, and relationship with mental health","authors":"Wenping Luo, Wenshu Fan, Yanglin Xia, Yanchun Dou, Juan Du","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional psychological qualities are crucial for individuals’ career development and overall well-being, especially in clinical medical professions. Medical students often face significant work, academic, and doctor-patient communication pressures, which can challenge their mental and emotional health. Measuring and understanding the relationship between medical students’ professional psychological qualities and their mental health is of significant practical importance.This study developed a comprehensive professional psychological qualities scale through a series of qualitative and quantitative studies, consisting of three main components and thirteen secondary dimensions. The scale’s reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficients. In Study 2, the scale was administered to 972 medical students to explore their anxiety and depression levels. A simple mediation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between professional psychological qualities, anxiety, and depression.The professional psychological qualities scale demonstrated satisfactory reliability, with a total scale α coefficient of 0.947 and subscale α coefficients ranging from 0.895 to 0.933. The mediation analysis revealed that medical students’ professional psychological qualities directly negatively impact depression levels and indirectly positively influence them via their effects on anxiety levels, exhibiting an overall masking effect unrelated to depression levels.This study addresses the gap in research on the professional psychological qualities of medical students by providing a reliable measurement tool. The findings shed light on the complex mechanisms through which these qualities impact the mental health process. The scale can be used by other researchers to assess medical students’ professional psychological qualities and further investigate their relationship with mental health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":507929,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional psychological qualities are crucial for individuals’ career development and overall well-being, especially in clinical medical professions. Medical students often face significant work, academic, and doctor-patient communication pressures, which can challenge their mental and emotional health. Measuring and understanding the relationship between medical students’ professional psychological qualities and their mental health is of significant practical importance.This study developed a comprehensive professional psychological qualities scale through a series of qualitative and quantitative studies, consisting of three main components and thirteen secondary dimensions. The scale’s reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficients. In Study 2, the scale was administered to 972 medical students to explore their anxiety and depression levels. A simple mediation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between professional psychological qualities, anxiety, and depression.The professional psychological qualities scale demonstrated satisfactory reliability, with a total scale α coefficient of 0.947 and subscale α coefficients ranging from 0.895 to 0.933. The mediation analysis revealed that medical students’ professional psychological qualities directly negatively impact depression levels and indirectly positively influence them via their effects on anxiety levels, exhibiting an overall masking effect unrelated to depression levels.This study addresses the gap in research on the professional psychological qualities of medical students by providing a reliable measurement tool. The findings shed light on the complex mechanisms through which these qualities impact the mental health process. The scale can be used by other researchers to assess medical students’ professional psychological qualities and further investigate their relationship with mental health outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国医学生的职业心理素质:理论模型、问卷编制及与心理健康的关系
职业心理素质对个人的职业发展和整体健康至关重要,尤其是在临床医学专业。医学生往往面临着巨大的工作、学业和医患沟通压力,这可能会挑战他们的心理和情绪健康。本研究通过一系列定性和定量研究,编制了一个综合职业心理素质量表,由三个主要部分和十三个次要维度组成。量表的信度采用 Cronbach's α 系数进行评估。在研究 2 中,该量表对 972 名医学生进行了施测,以了解他们的焦虑和抑郁水平。专业心理素质量表的信度令人满意,总量表α系数为0.947,分量表α系数在0.895至0.933之间。中介分析表明,医学生的职业心理素质直接对抑郁水平产生负向影响,并通过对焦虑水平的影响间接对抑郁水平产生正向影响,表现出与抑郁水平无关的整体遮蔽效应。研究结果揭示了这些素质影响心理健康过程的复杂机制。该量表可供其他研究人员用于评估医学生的职业心理素质,并进一步研究它们与心理健康结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
eLIFEwithIBD: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of an online acceptance and commitment therapy and compassion-based intervention in inflammatory bowel disease Processing of emotional connotations in Chinese monomorphic and compound words reflected by the early posterior negativity The assessment of reliability generalisation of clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): a meta-analysis Culturalizing theory and research on cognitive models of hope A high-frequency sense list
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1