Radiation belt phase space density: calculation analysis and model dependence

D. E. da Silva, S. Elkington, X. Li, M. K. Hudson, A. J. Boyd, A. Jaynes, M. Wiltberger
{"title":"Radiation belt phase space density: calculation analysis and model dependence","authors":"D. E. da Silva, S. Elkington, X. Li, M. K. Hudson, A. J. Boyd, A. Jaynes, M. Wiltberger","doi":"10.3389/fspas.2024.1423545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reprocessing of radiation belt electron flux measurements into phase space density (PSD) as a function of the adiabatic invariants is a widely-used method to address major questions regarding electron energization and loss in the outer radiation belt. In this reprocessing, flux measurements j (α, E) at local pitch angles α, energies E, and optionally magnetometer measurements B, are combined with a global magnetic field model to express the phase space density f (L*) in terms of the third invariant Φ ∝ 1/L* at fixed first and second invariants M and K. While the general framework of the calculation is agreed upon, implementation details vary amongst the literature, and the issue of magnetic field model dependence is rarely addressed. This work reviews the steps of the calculation with lists of commonly used implementation options. For the first time, analysis is presented to display the effect of doing the calculation with different implementation options and with different backing models (including both empirical and MHD-driven models). The results are summarized to inform evaluation of existing results and future efforts calculating and analyzing radiation belt electron phase space density. Three events are analyzed, and while differences are found, the primary structural interpretations of the phase space density analysis exhibit model independence.","PeriodicalId":507437,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024.1423545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reprocessing of radiation belt electron flux measurements into phase space density (PSD) as a function of the adiabatic invariants is a widely-used method to address major questions regarding electron energization and loss in the outer radiation belt. In this reprocessing, flux measurements j (α, E) at local pitch angles α, energies E, and optionally magnetometer measurements B, are combined with a global magnetic field model to express the phase space density f (L*) in terms of the third invariant Φ ∝ 1/L* at fixed first and second invariants M and K. While the general framework of the calculation is agreed upon, implementation details vary amongst the literature, and the issue of magnetic field model dependence is rarely addressed. This work reviews the steps of the calculation with lists of commonly used implementation options. For the first time, analysis is presented to display the effect of doing the calculation with different implementation options and with different backing models (including both empirical and MHD-driven models). The results are summarized to inform evaluation of existing results and future efforts calculating and analyzing radiation belt electron phase space density. Three events are analyzed, and while differences are found, the primary structural interpretations of the phase space density analysis exhibit model independence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辐射带相空间密度:计算分析和模型依赖性
将辐射带电子通量测量结果作为绝热不变量函数重新处理为相空间密度(PSD)是一种广泛使用的方法,用于解决有关外辐射带电子通量和损耗的主要问题。在这种再处理过程中,将局部俯仰角α、能量E以及可选磁强计测量值B的通量测量值j(α,E)与全局磁场模型相结合,在固定第一和第二不变式M和K的条件下,用第三不变式Φ∝1/L*来表示相空间密度f(L*)。本研究回顾了计算步骤,并列出了常用的实施方案。文中首次分析了使用不同实施方案和不同支持模型(包括经验模型和 MHD 驱动模型)进行计算的效果。对结果进行了总结,以便为评估现有结果和未来计算与分析辐射带电子相空间密度的工作提供信息。分析了三个事件,虽然发现了差异,但相空间密度分析的主要结构解释表现出了模型独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of a W UMa-type contact binary GZ And in a physical triple system Probing turbulence in solar flares from SDO/AIA emission lines Dependence of daytime thermospheric winds on IMF By as measured from south pole Numerical model of the QiTai radio Telescope PAF receiver signal and simulation of interference mitigation Research on identification of nucleus-shaped anomaly regions in space electric field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1