Neuropedagogy in Higher Education

Anthony Moss-Zobel
{"title":"Neuropedagogy in Higher Education","authors":"Anthony Moss-Zobel","doi":"10.3897/aca.7.e129736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The convergence of neuroscience and pedagogy, known as neuroeducation, has sparked significant interest in the field of education since US President George Bush declared the 1990s to be ’The Decade of the Brain'. The purpose of this study is to look into worldwide higher education educators' and administrators' opinions, needs, and potential performance consequences for neuroeducation. The study goes into the complex link between neuroscience research and educational practices.\n The education community is keen to acquire the neuroscience findings transfer into neuro-methodologies and neuro-didactics that promises to improve learning outcomes. There are several challenges that the education community must be mindful of in pursuing effective evidence-based practices. One is neuromyths, which are misrepresentations or misunderstandings about scientific findings. Second, having a common language that educators, parents, administrators, and policymakers can use to discuss neuroeducation in a meaningful way is necessary. Several keywords are used interchangably such as; neuroeducation, neuropedagogy, educational neuroscience among others which can be confusing. Third, policy decisions must be made based on clear goals and grounded in evidence. Lots of resources are wasted on prescriptive methods that have no connection to any sound research. Fourth, There is evidence of strong interest in how the brain learns and processes information which means that access to evidence-based research findings must be accessible to help decrease misleading and misinformation. Fragkaki et al. 2022 However, the growing interest in the education–brain relationship does not match the proper use of research findings.\n The research questions attempt to provide answers to the perspectives on neuroeducation and understand the interest and awareness of neuro-methodologies and neuro-didactics in the higher education community. \n \n Objectives:\n \n 1. Perception Analysis: The goal is to identify and analyze worldwide perceptions of neuroeducation among higher education educators, with an emphasis on understanding how these perceptions influence teaching approaches.\n 2. Performance-Oriented Training Needs: To investigate the perceived training needs and wants of higher education instructors and administrators in terms of neuroeducation-based strategies for improving performance outcomes, such as engagement and commitment.\n 3. Neuromyth Impact: This study will look into the knowledge and prevalence of neuromyths among educators, as well as their possible impact on performance-oriented pedagogical practices.\n \n Methodology:\n \n This study takes a mixed-methods approach, including surveys with Likert scale questions disseminated between May and December 2023. The questionnaire covers five major performance-related areas: communication and emotions, concentration and engagement, didactic methodologies, creativity and critical thinking, and neuroscience and neuropedagogy.\n Quantitative data will be analyzed using statistical tools, with an emphasis on potential relationships between neuroeducation perceptions and performance outcomes. The thematic investigation will be used for qualitative data, with an emphasis on aspects crucial to performance enhancement.\n \n Future Research:\n \n This finding sets the path for future research into performance-based neuroeducation. The following research may investigate the efficacy of neuroeducation-based training programs in improving particular performance markers. Longitudinal study can monitor the long-term influence of neuroeducation on instructors' performance-related practices, offering significant insights for ongoing development. Furthermore, investigating the influence of misinformation and disinformation on educators' decision-making processes, as well as the consequent impact on performance, is a viable path for future research.\n This study adds to the academic discourse on neuroeducation while also providing practical insights to improve instructors' performance, benefiting both higher education institutions and students.","PeriodicalId":101714,"journal":{"name":"ARPHA Conference Abstracts","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARPHA Conference Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.7.e129736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The convergence of neuroscience and pedagogy, known as neuroeducation, has sparked significant interest in the field of education since US President George Bush declared the 1990s to be ’The Decade of the Brain'. The purpose of this study is to look into worldwide higher education educators' and administrators' opinions, needs, and potential performance consequences for neuroeducation. The study goes into the complex link between neuroscience research and educational practices. The education community is keen to acquire the neuroscience findings transfer into neuro-methodologies and neuro-didactics that promises to improve learning outcomes. There are several challenges that the education community must be mindful of in pursuing effective evidence-based practices. One is neuromyths, which are misrepresentations or misunderstandings about scientific findings. Second, having a common language that educators, parents, administrators, and policymakers can use to discuss neuroeducation in a meaningful way is necessary. Several keywords are used interchangably such as; neuroeducation, neuropedagogy, educational neuroscience among others which can be confusing. Third, policy decisions must be made based on clear goals and grounded in evidence. Lots of resources are wasted on prescriptive methods that have no connection to any sound research. Fourth, There is evidence of strong interest in how the brain learns and processes information which means that access to evidence-based research findings must be accessible to help decrease misleading and misinformation. Fragkaki et al. 2022 However, the growing interest in the education–brain relationship does not match the proper use of research findings. The research questions attempt to provide answers to the perspectives on neuroeducation and understand the interest and awareness of neuro-methodologies and neuro-didactics in the higher education community. Objectives: 1. Perception Analysis: The goal is to identify and analyze worldwide perceptions of neuroeducation among higher education educators, with an emphasis on understanding how these perceptions influence teaching approaches. 2. Performance-Oriented Training Needs: To investigate the perceived training needs and wants of higher education instructors and administrators in terms of neuroeducation-based strategies for improving performance outcomes, such as engagement and commitment. 3. Neuromyth Impact: This study will look into the knowledge and prevalence of neuromyths among educators, as well as their possible impact on performance-oriented pedagogical practices. Methodology: This study takes a mixed-methods approach, including surveys with Likert scale questions disseminated between May and December 2023. The questionnaire covers five major performance-related areas: communication and emotions, concentration and engagement, didactic methodologies, creativity and critical thinking, and neuroscience and neuropedagogy. Quantitative data will be analyzed using statistical tools, with an emphasis on potential relationships between neuroeducation perceptions and performance outcomes. The thematic investigation will be used for qualitative data, with an emphasis on aspects crucial to performance enhancement. Future Research: This finding sets the path for future research into performance-based neuroeducation. The following research may investigate the efficacy of neuroeducation-based training programs in improving particular performance markers. Longitudinal study can monitor the long-term influence of neuroeducation on instructors' performance-related practices, offering significant insights for ongoing development. Furthermore, investigating the influence of misinformation and disinformation on educators' decision-making processes, as well as the consequent impact on performance, is a viable path for future research. This study adds to the academic discourse on neuroeducation while also providing practical insights to improve instructors' performance, benefiting both higher education institutions and students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育中的神经教育学
自美国总统乔治-布什宣布 20 世纪 90 年代为 "大脑十年 "以来,神经科学与教学法的融合,即所谓的神经教育,在教育领域引发了极大的兴趣。本研究的目的是调查全球高等教育教育者和管理者对神经教育的看法、需求和潜在的绩效后果。本研究深入探讨了神经科学研究与教育实践之间的复杂联系。教育界热衷于将神经科学研究成果转化为神经方法学和神经教学法,以改善学习效果。教育界在追求有效的循证实践时必须注意几个挑战。其一是神经迷思,即对科学发现的歪曲或误解。其次,教育工作者、家长、管理者和政策制定者有必要使用一种共同的语言来有意义地讨论神经教育。神经教育、神经教育学、教育神经科学等几个关键词被交替使用,可能会造成混淆。第三,决策必须基于明确的目标和证据。大量资源被浪费在与任何可靠研究无关的指令性方法上。第四,有证据表明,人们对大脑如何学习和处理信息有着浓厚的兴趣,这意味着必须提供以证据为基础的研究成果,以帮助减少误导和错误信息。Fragkaki et al. 2022 然而,人们对教育与大脑关系的兴趣与日俱增,却与研究成果的正确使用不相匹配。这些研究问题试图为神经教育的观点提供答案,并了解高等教育界对神经方法学和神经教学法的兴趣和认识。 研究目标 1.认知分析:目标是确定和分析全世界高等教育工作者对神经教育的看法,重点是了解这些看法如何影响教学方法。2.以绩效为导向的培训需求:调查高等教育教师和管理人员对基于神经教育的培训需求和愿望,以提高绩效成果,如参与度和投入度。3.神经肌肉的影响:本研究将调查教育工作者对神经迷思的了解和普遍程度,以及神经迷思对以绩效为导向的教学实践可能产生的影响。 研究方法: 本研究采用混合方法,包括在 2023 年 5 月至 12 月期间分发的带有李克特量表问题的调查问卷。问卷涉及五个与成绩相关的主要领域:交流与情感、专注与参与、教学方法、创造力与批判性思维以及神经科学与神经教育学。将使用统计工具对定量数据进行分析,重点关注神经教育认知与成绩结果之间的潜在关系。专题调查将用于定性数据,重点是对提高成绩至关重要的方面。 未来研究: 这一发现为未来基于成绩的神经教育研究指明了方向。以下研究可能会调查基于神经教育的培训计划在提高特定绩效指标方面的功效。纵向研究可以监测神经教育对教员绩效相关实践的长期影响,为持续发展提供重要启示。此外,调查错误信息和虚假信息对教育者决策过程的影响,以及由此对绩效的影响,也是未来研究的一条可行之路。本研究为神经教育的学术研究添砖加瓦,同时也为提高教师绩效提供了实用的见解,使高等教育机构和学生都能从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Majority Expatriate National Cultures on the Organizational Culture in the UAE Healthcare Sector The Implementation of SEO for Local Businesses – an Analyses of Event Locations in Berlin Examining the relationship between system noise and organisational performance in local government in Australia Crowdfunding Campaign Influences on Market Pricing Decisions "Uncertainty and fragility, I love you" artists' words
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1