Accounting for visual field abnormalities when using eye-tracking to diagnose reading problems in neurological degeneration

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Eye Movement Research Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.16910/jemr.17.2.2
Carla Daniela Guantay, Laura Mena-García, M. Tola-Arribas, María José Garea García-Malvar, Marta Para-Prieto, María Gloria González-Fernández, A. Mayo‐Iscar, J. Pastor-Jimeno
{"title":"Accounting for visual field abnormalities when using eye-tracking to diagnose reading problems in neurological degeneration","authors":"Carla Daniela Guantay, Laura Mena-García, M. Tola-Arribas, María José Garea García-Malvar, Marta Para-Prieto, María Gloria González-Fernández, A. Mayo‐Iscar, J. Pastor-Jimeno","doi":"10.16910/jemr.17.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State-of-the-art eye trackers provide valuable information for diagnosing reading problems by measuring and interpreting people’s gaze paths as they read through text. Abnormal conditions such as visual field defects, however, can seriously confound most of today’s existing methods for interpreting reading gaze patterns.\nOur objective was to research how visual field defects impact reading gaze path patterns, so the effects of such neurological pathologies can be explicitly incorporated into more comprehensive reading diagnosis methodologies. A cross-sectional, non-randomized, pilot clinical study including 45 patients with various neurologic disorders and 30 normal controls was designed. Participants underwent ophthalmologic/neuropsychologic and eye-tracker examinations using two reading tests of words and numbers.\nThe results showed that the use of the eye tracker showed that patients with brain damage and an altered visual field require more time to complete a reading-text test by fixating a greater number of times (p < 0.001); with longer fixations (p = 0.03); and a greater number of saccades in these patients (p = 0.04). Our study showed objective differences in eye movement characteristics in patients with neurological diseases and an altered visual field who complained of reading difficulties. These findings should be considered as a bias factor and deserve further investigation.","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.17.2.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

State-of-the-art eye trackers provide valuable information for diagnosing reading problems by measuring and interpreting people’s gaze paths as they read through text. Abnormal conditions such as visual field defects, however, can seriously confound most of today’s existing methods for interpreting reading gaze patterns. Our objective was to research how visual field defects impact reading gaze path patterns, so the effects of such neurological pathologies can be explicitly incorporated into more comprehensive reading diagnosis methodologies. A cross-sectional, non-randomized, pilot clinical study including 45 patients with various neurologic disorders and 30 normal controls was designed. Participants underwent ophthalmologic/neuropsychologic and eye-tracker examinations using two reading tests of words and numbers. The results showed that the use of the eye tracker showed that patients with brain damage and an altered visual field require more time to complete a reading-text test by fixating a greater number of times (p < 0.001); with longer fixations (p = 0.03); and a greater number of saccades in these patients (p = 0.04). Our study showed objective differences in eye movement characteristics in patients with neurological diseases and an altered visual field who complained of reading difficulties. These findings should be considered as a bias factor and deserve further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用眼动跟踪技术诊断神经系统变性患者的阅读问题时考虑视野异常情况
最先进的眼动仪通过测量和解释人们阅读文本时的注视路径,为诊断阅读问题提供了宝贵的信息。我们的目标是研究视野缺陷如何影响阅读注视路径模式,以便将此类神经系统病变的影响明确纳入更全面的阅读诊断方法中。我们设计了一项横断面、非随机、试验性临床研究,其中包括 45 名患有各种神经系统疾病的患者和 30 名正常对照者。结果显示,使用眼动仪显示脑损伤和视野改变的患者需要更多的时间来完成文字阅读测试,这些患者的定点次数更多 (p < 0.001);定点时间更长 (p = 0.03);眼球移动次数更多 (p = 0.04)。我们的研究表明,患有神经系统疾病和视野改变并抱怨阅读困难的患者的眼球运动特征存在客观差异。这些发现应被视为偏差因素,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,
期刊最新文献
Persistence of primitive reflexes associated with asymmetries in fixation and ocular motility values. Influence of complexity and Gestalt principles on aesthetic preferences for building façades: An eye tracking study Classification framework to identify similar visual scan paths using multiple similarity metrics Gender selection dilemma in FMCG advertising: Insights from eye-tracking research Gaze behavior reveals automaticity and attention allocation during music teaching vs. observing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1