Machine Learning for Extraction of Image Features Associated with Progression of Geographic Atrophy

J. Arslan, Kurt Benke
{"title":"Machine Learning for Extraction of Image Features Associated with Progression of Geographic Atrophy","authors":"J. Arslan, Kurt Benke","doi":"10.3390/biomedinformatics4030089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several studies have investigated various features and models in order to understand the growth and progression of the ocular disease geographic atrophy (GA). Commonly assessed features include age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, hypertension, and diabetes. There have been inconsistencies regarding which features correlate with GA progression. Chief amongst these inconsistencies is whether the investigated features are readily available for analysis across various ophthalmic institutions. Methods:In this study, we focused our attention on the association of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging features and GA progression. Our method included feature extraction using radiomic processes and feature ranking by machine learning incorporating the algorithm XGBoost to determine the best-ranked features. This led to the development of an image-based linear mixed-effects model, which was designed to account for slope change based on within-subject variability and inter-eye correlation. Metrics used to assess the linear mixed-effects model included marginal and conditional R2, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), root mean square error (RMSE), mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and loglikelihood. Results: We developed a linear mixed-effects model with 15 image-based features. The model results were as follows: R2 = 0.96, r = 0.981, RMSE = 1.32, ME = −7.3 × 10−15, MAE = 0.94, MAD = 0.999, AIC = 2084.93, BIC = 2169.97, and log likelihood = −1022.46. Conclusions: The advantage of our method is that it relies on the inherent properties of the image itself, rather than the availability of clinical or demographic data. Thus, the image features discovered in this study are universally and readily available across the board.","PeriodicalId":72394,"journal":{"name":"BioMedInformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedInformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics4030089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies have investigated various features and models in order to understand the growth and progression of the ocular disease geographic atrophy (GA). Commonly assessed features include age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, hypertension, and diabetes. There have been inconsistencies regarding which features correlate with GA progression. Chief amongst these inconsistencies is whether the investigated features are readily available for analysis across various ophthalmic institutions. Methods:In this study, we focused our attention on the association of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging features and GA progression. Our method included feature extraction using radiomic processes and feature ranking by machine learning incorporating the algorithm XGBoost to determine the best-ranked features. This led to the development of an image-based linear mixed-effects model, which was designed to account for slope change based on within-subject variability and inter-eye correlation. Metrics used to assess the linear mixed-effects model included marginal and conditional R2, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), root mean square error (RMSE), mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and loglikelihood. Results: We developed a linear mixed-effects model with 15 image-based features. The model results were as follows: R2 = 0.96, r = 0.981, RMSE = 1.32, ME = −7.3 × 10−15, MAE = 0.94, MAD = 0.999, AIC = 2084.93, BIC = 2169.97, and log likelihood = −1022.46. Conclusions: The advantage of our method is that it relies on the inherent properties of the image itself, rather than the availability of clinical or demographic data. Thus, the image features discovered in this study are universally and readily available across the board.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过机器学习提取与地理萎缩进展相关的图像特征
背景:有几项研究对各种特征和模型进行了调查,以了解眼部疾病地理萎缩(GA)的生长和进展。常见的评估特征包括年龄、性别、吸烟、饮酒、久坐不动的生活方式、高血压和糖尿病。关于哪些特征与 GA 的进展相关,一直存在不一致的看法。在这些不一致中,最主要的是各眼科机构是否能随时对所调查的特征进行分析。方法:在本研究中,我们重点关注眼底自动荧光(FAF)成像特征与 GA 进展的关联。我们的方法包括使用放射学过程提取特征,并通过机器学习结合 XGBoost 算法进行特征排序,以确定最佳排序特征。这导致了基于图像的线性混合效应模型的开发,该模型旨在考虑基于受试者内变异性和眼间相关性的斜率变化。用于评估线性混合效应模型的指标包括边际和条件 R2、皮尔逊相关系数 (r)、均方根误差 (RMSE)、平均误差 (ME)、平均绝对误差 (MAE)、平均绝对偏差 (MAD)、阿凯克信息准则 (AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则 (BIC) 和对数概率。结果我们建立了一个包含 15 个图像特征的线性混合效应模型。模型结果如下R2 = 0.96,r = 0.981,RMSE = 1.32,ME = -7.3 × 10-15,MAE = 0.94,MAD = 0.999,AIC = 2084.93,BIC = 2169.97,对数似然 = -1022.46。结论我们的方法的优势在于它依赖于图像本身的固有特性,而不是临床或人口统计学数据。因此,本研究中发现的图像特征具有普遍性,可以随时随地获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cinco de Bio: A Low-Code Platform for Domain-Specific Workflows for Biomedical Imaging Research Approaches to Extracting Patterns of Service Utilization for Patients with Complex Conditions: Graph Community Detection vs. Natural Language Processing Clustering Replies to Queries in Gynecologic Oncology by Bard, Bing and the Google Assistant Should AI-Powered Whole-Genome Sequencing Be Used Routinely for Personalized Decision Support in Surgical Oncology—A Scoping Review Transfer-Learning Approach for Enhanced Brain Tumor Classification in MRI Imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1