Maria Dimitrova, Nezabravka Tsvetanova, Daniel Penchev, G. Petrova
{"title":"Proton therapy for head and neck cancer therapy: A real-world data case study from Bulgaria","authors":"Maria Dimitrova, Nezabravka Tsvetanova, Daniel Penchev, G. Petrova","doi":"10.3897/pharmacia.71.e129379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Head and neck cancers (HNC) are one of the most severe types of cancer in Europe, accounting for almost 4.5% of all cancer types, according to GLOBOCAN. The incidence is geographically variable, with higher rates observed in Eastern and Southern Europe than in Northern and Western Europe. Proton and photon therapies are both available treatment approaches for head and neck cancer, as each has its own unique advantages, characteristics, and considerations. Proton therapy is the newest one and is considered safer among both. The current study aims to analyse the available data for patients with head and neck cancer treated with proton therapy in Bulgaria based on real-world data generated through AI-based patient registries and the current availability of strategic policy documents ensuring the affordability of proton therapy on a national level. We wanted to explore the feasibility of building a national proton therapy centre based on available patients’ information and strategic policy documents. We conducted a 3-year (2020–2022) combined non-interventional retrospective database study on head and neck cancer using secondary use of real-world data from dynamic patient registries and desktop analysis of strategic policy documents for capacity and financial affordability for proton therapy in Bulgaria. The results show that Bulgaria has a strategic policy document that focuses on the need and funding possibilities for establishing this treatment within the country. However, the country lacks the political will to ensure appropriate funding for it. Building a national proton centre is a feasible investment but needs additional detailed budget impact analysis.","PeriodicalId":508564,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e129379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Head and neck cancers (HNC) are one of the most severe types of cancer in Europe, accounting for almost 4.5% of all cancer types, according to GLOBOCAN. The incidence is geographically variable, with higher rates observed in Eastern and Southern Europe than in Northern and Western Europe. Proton and photon therapies are both available treatment approaches for head and neck cancer, as each has its own unique advantages, characteristics, and considerations. Proton therapy is the newest one and is considered safer among both. The current study aims to analyse the available data for patients with head and neck cancer treated with proton therapy in Bulgaria based on real-world data generated through AI-based patient registries and the current availability of strategic policy documents ensuring the affordability of proton therapy on a national level. We wanted to explore the feasibility of building a national proton therapy centre based on available patients’ information and strategic policy documents. We conducted a 3-year (2020–2022) combined non-interventional retrospective database study on head and neck cancer using secondary use of real-world data from dynamic patient registries and desktop analysis of strategic policy documents for capacity and financial affordability for proton therapy in Bulgaria. The results show that Bulgaria has a strategic policy document that focuses on the need and funding possibilities for establishing this treatment within the country. However, the country lacks the political will to ensure appropriate funding for it. Building a national proton centre is a feasible investment but needs additional detailed budget impact analysis.