M. Atyukov, I. Zemtsova, A. S. Petrov, O. A. Zhemchugova-Zelenova, P. Yablonskiy
{"title":"Features and outcomes of bilateral anatomical lung resections in patients with lung cancer","authors":"M. Atyukov, I. Zemtsova, A. S. Petrov, O. A. Zhemchugova-Zelenova, P. Yablonskiy","doi":"10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-3-44-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of sequential bilateral anatomical lung resections performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy approaches in lung cancer patients, as well as to identify factors affecting the postoperative period. Material and Methods. Of 534 NSCLC patients undergoing anatomical lung resection in Center for Intensive Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery from 2014 to 2022, 14 patients with consecutive bilateral anatomical lung resections were included in the retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups depending on a surgical approach used during the first surgery: group I – 5 patients underwent thoracotomy and group II – 9 patients underwent videoassisted thoracic surgery (VATS). The groups were matched for gender, age, smoking, Charlson Comorbidity Index, lung resection, functional status and stage of the disease. Surgical treatment included anatomical lung resection and ipsilateral systematic lymph dissection. Results. There were significant differences in intraoperative blood loss between the groups. Postoperative complications after surgery on the contralateral lung were observed more often in group 1 patients than in group II patents. The overall 5-year survival rates in patients of groups 1 and 2 were 60 % and 86 %, respectively. Respiratory function indicators three months after surgery corresponded to preoperative prognosis, and their decrease did not depend on the surgical approach used. In comparison with patients who underwent standard unilateral lung resection, bilateral anatomical lung resection was not associated with increased number of “major” complications, however, an increase in the frequency of prolonged air discharge was noted (26 % vs 6 %; p<0.05). Conclusion. Sequential bilateral anatomical lung resections are feasible and safe after thorough preoperative assessment of the functional reserves of the cardio-respiratory system. Mini-invasive technologies make it possible to reduce the frequency of complications in the early postoperative period. The use of the VATS approach makes it possible to safely perform anatomical resection of the contralateral lung.","PeriodicalId":21881,"journal":{"name":"Siberian journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-3-44-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of sequential bilateral anatomical lung resections performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy approaches in lung cancer patients, as well as to identify factors affecting the postoperative period. Material and Methods. Of 534 NSCLC patients undergoing anatomical lung resection in Center for Intensive Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery from 2014 to 2022, 14 patients with consecutive bilateral anatomical lung resections were included in the retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups depending on a surgical approach used during the first surgery: group I – 5 patients underwent thoracotomy and group II – 9 patients underwent videoassisted thoracic surgery (VATS). The groups were matched for gender, age, smoking, Charlson Comorbidity Index, lung resection, functional status and stage of the disease. Surgical treatment included anatomical lung resection and ipsilateral systematic lymph dissection. Results. There were significant differences in intraoperative blood loss between the groups. Postoperative complications after surgery on the contralateral lung were observed more often in group 1 patients than in group II patents. The overall 5-year survival rates in patients of groups 1 and 2 were 60 % and 86 %, respectively. Respiratory function indicators three months after surgery corresponded to preoperative prognosis, and their decrease did not depend on the surgical approach used. In comparison with patients who underwent standard unilateral lung resection, bilateral anatomical lung resection was not associated with increased number of “major” complications, however, an increase in the frequency of prolonged air discharge was noted (26 % vs 6 %; p<0.05). Conclusion. Sequential bilateral anatomical lung resections are feasible and safe after thorough preoperative assessment of the functional reserves of the cardio-respiratory system. Mini-invasive technologies make it possible to reduce the frequency of complications in the early postoperative period. The use of the VATS approach makes it possible to safely perform anatomical resection of the contralateral lung.
期刊介绍:
The main objectives of the journal are: -to promote the establishment of Russia’s leading worldwide positions in the field of experimental and clinical oncology- to create the international discussion platform intended to cover all aspects of basic and clinical cancer research, including carcinogenesis, molecular biology, epidemiology, cancer prevention, diagnosis and multimodality treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy), anesthetic management, medical and social rehabilitation, palliative care as well as the improvement of life quality of cancer patients- to encourage promising young scientists to be actively involved in cancer research programs- to provide a platform for researches and doctors all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in cancer related problems. (to create a communication platform for the expansion of cooperation between Russian and foreign professional associations).- to provide the information about the latest worldwide achievements in different fields of oncology The most important tasks of the journal are: -to encourage scientists to publish their research results- to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest - to invite the most prominent Russian and foreign authors to share their latest research findings with cancer research community- to promote the exchange of research information, clinical experience, current trends and the recent developments in the field of oncology as well as to review interesting cases encountered by colleagues all over the world- to expand the editorial board and reviewers with the involvement of well-known Russian and foreign experts- to provide open access to full text articles- to include the journal into the international database- to increase the journal’s impact factor- to promote the journal to the International and Russian markets