Nature-based solutions in the savanna belt of Africa: Insights from a systematic review

Daniel O. Olago , Timothy A. Downing , Yvonne Githiora , Christian Borgemeister , Juliet Kamau , Gerda Kuiper , N'golo A. Koné , Christine Omuombo
{"title":"Nature-based solutions in the savanna belt of Africa: Insights from a systematic review","authors":"Daniel O. Olago ,&nbsp;Timothy A. Downing ,&nbsp;Yvonne Githiora ,&nbsp;Christian Borgemeister ,&nbsp;Juliet Kamau ,&nbsp;Gerda Kuiper ,&nbsp;N'golo A. Koné ,&nbsp;Christine Omuombo","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are powerful tools whereby, using nature as the template, societal challenges can be addressed, while simultaneously achieving co-benefits for the environment. NbS have been successfully demonstrated in different ecosystems around the globe, but for savanna ecosystems - the planet's largest terrestrial biome - there is a lingering lack of clarity of what constitutes an NbS. We undertook a systematic review of literature in the savanna belt of Africa - stretching from Senegal to Tanzania. This review examined 3,714 journal articles from 2018 to 2022, out of which 271 papers met the inclusion criteria. Results show that there are a wide variety of nature-based techniques and strategies being used in the savanna-belt. Yet upon greater scrutiny, few qualified as NbS according to the IUCN criteria. Less than 2 % of papers met all the criteria, falling short in the areas of biodiversity gains, economic viability, governance processes, trade-offs, and adaptive management. The geographical and sectoral scopes of these solutions were also limited: 72 % of papers were from just 5 countries, and 80 % were from the agriculture/livestock sectors. Notably, 5 % involved creation of new ecosystems. Author collaborations between countries of the global south with savanna ecosystems were few. Our findings suggest research silos in NbS discourses: the peer-reviewed literature revolves around smallholder farming in just a few countries, where the research is generally driven by the global north. These factors prevent NbS from becoming truly transformational in addressing societal challenges in the savanna belt of Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000454/pdfft?md5=b726b616f4d8a50a9f574ca6e93fd007&pid=1-s2.0-S2772411524000454-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are powerful tools whereby, using nature as the template, societal challenges can be addressed, while simultaneously achieving co-benefits for the environment. NbS have been successfully demonstrated in different ecosystems around the globe, but for savanna ecosystems - the planet's largest terrestrial biome - there is a lingering lack of clarity of what constitutes an NbS. We undertook a systematic review of literature in the savanna belt of Africa - stretching from Senegal to Tanzania. This review examined 3,714 journal articles from 2018 to 2022, out of which 271 papers met the inclusion criteria. Results show that there are a wide variety of nature-based techniques and strategies being used in the savanna-belt. Yet upon greater scrutiny, few qualified as NbS according to the IUCN criteria. Less than 2 % of papers met all the criteria, falling short in the areas of biodiversity gains, economic viability, governance processes, trade-offs, and adaptive management. The geographical and sectoral scopes of these solutions were also limited: 72 % of papers were from just 5 countries, and 80 % were from the agriculture/livestock sectors. Notably, 5 % involved creation of new ecosystems. Author collaborations between countries of the global south with savanna ecosystems were few. Our findings suggest research silos in NbS discourses: the peer-reviewed literature revolves around smallholder farming in just a few countries, where the research is generally driven by the global north. These factors prevent NbS from becoming truly transformational in addressing societal challenges in the savanna belt of Africa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲热带草原带基于自然的解决方案:系统审查的启示
以自然为基础的解决方案(NbS)是一种强大的工具,它以自然为模板,在应对社会挑战的同时为环境带来共同利益。NbS 已在全球不同的生态系统中得到成功验证,但对于地球上最大的陆地生物群落--热带稀树草原生态系统来说,什么是 NbS 仍不明确。我们对从塞内加尔到坦桑尼亚的非洲热带稀树草原带的文献进行了系统回顾。该综述研究了 2018 年至 2022 年期间的 3714 篇期刊论文,其中 271 篇符合纳入标准。结果显示,热带稀树草原带使用的基于自然的技术和策略种类繁多。然而,根据世界自然保护联盟(IUCN)的标准,经仔细研究,符合 NbS 标准的论文寥寥无几。只有不到 2% 的论文符合所有标准,在生物多样性收益、经济可行性、治理过程、权衡和适应性管理等方面存在不足。这些解决方案的地域和部门范围也很有限:72% 的论文仅来自 5 个国家,80% 来自农业/畜牧业部门。值得注意的是,5% 的论文涉及创建新的生态系统。全球南方国家与热带稀树草原生态系统之间的作者合作很少。我们的研究结果表明,在 NbS 的讨论中存在研究孤岛:同行评审的文献仅围绕少数几个国家的小农耕作,而这些国家的研究通常由全球北方驱动。这些因素阻碍了非农化在应对非洲热带稀树草原地带的社会挑战方面实现真正的转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Money talks. A systems perspective on funding and financing barriers to nature-based solutions Exploring social contracts of disaster risk through twitter narratives during a major storm A transformations framework for mainstreaming a nature-based solutions approach Cost-benefit and equity analysis of nature-based solutions in Haiti, India, Indonesia and Uganda “Financing urban Nature-based Solutions (NBS): A literature review from the perspective of funders”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1