Multiplane reconstruction modifies the diagnostic performance of CT angiography in carotid webs

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108441
{"title":"Multiplane reconstruction modifies the diagnostic performance of CT angiography in carotid webs","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Carotid Web (CaW) represents an overlooked stroke etiology and has been associated with high recurrence rates and to be amenable to stenting. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of different computed tomography angiography (CTA) projections in CaW.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients &lt;65 years-old with symptomatic CaW (n=31), carotid atherosclerosis (n=27), or normal carotids (n=49) diagnosed with a thin-cut CTA were included. Deidentified CTAs were independently reviewed by three readers, who recorded the diagnosis and level of certainty after evaluating the axial plane alone, after adding sagittal/coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP), then after oblique MPR reformats.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 93 total CaW, 81 atherosclerosis, and 147 normal carotid reads. With CTA axial projection alone, less CaW cases (44.1 %) were appropriately diagnosed as compared to atherosclerosis (87.7 %; p&lt;0.001) and normal carotid (83 %; p&lt;0.001) cases. Sagittal/coronal MIPS increased the rate of accurate CaW diagnosis (44.1–76.3 %; p&lt;0.001). Inter-rater agreement in CaW detection increased from k= 0.46 (0.35–0.57) using axial to k= 0.80 (0.69–0.91) with sagittal/coronal planes. The axial projection alone had lower sensitivity (44 % vs. 76 %) but similar specificity (95 % vs. 96 %) in CaW detection compared to axial+ sagittal/coronal MIPS. The accuracy in detecting atherosclerosis or normal carotids did not increase after adding sagittal/coronal MIPS and oblique MPRs. The certainty level for CaW diagnosis was lower when compared to atherosclerosis and normal carotids using axial alone (3.0 [3.0–4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0–5.0]; p&lt;0.001 and 4.0 [3.0–5.0]; p&lt;0.001) as well as after adding sagittal/coronal MIPS (4.0 [3.0–5.0] vs. 5.0[4.0–5.0]; p=0.01 and 4.0 [4.0–5.0]; p&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CTA axial plane alone was insufficient for CaW detection. CTA sagittal/coronal MIP reconstructions as well as oblique MPR reformats enhanced the accuracy and confidence related to CaW diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Carotid Web (CaW) represents an overlooked stroke etiology and has been associated with high recurrence rates and to be amenable to stenting. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of different computed tomography angiography (CTA) projections in CaW.

Methods

Consecutive patients <65 years-old with symptomatic CaW (n=31), carotid atherosclerosis (n=27), or normal carotids (n=49) diagnosed with a thin-cut CTA were included. Deidentified CTAs were independently reviewed by three readers, who recorded the diagnosis and level of certainty after evaluating the axial plane alone, after adding sagittal/coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP), then after oblique MPR reformats.

Results

There were 93 total CaW, 81 atherosclerosis, and 147 normal carotid reads. With CTA axial projection alone, less CaW cases (44.1 %) were appropriately diagnosed as compared to atherosclerosis (87.7 %; p<0.001) and normal carotid (83 %; p<0.001) cases. Sagittal/coronal MIPS increased the rate of accurate CaW diagnosis (44.1–76.3 %; p<0.001). Inter-rater agreement in CaW detection increased from k= 0.46 (0.35–0.57) using axial to k= 0.80 (0.69–0.91) with sagittal/coronal planes. The axial projection alone had lower sensitivity (44 % vs. 76 %) but similar specificity (95 % vs. 96 %) in CaW detection compared to axial+ sagittal/coronal MIPS. The accuracy in detecting atherosclerosis or normal carotids did not increase after adding sagittal/coronal MIPS and oblique MPRs. The certainty level for CaW diagnosis was lower when compared to atherosclerosis and normal carotids using axial alone (3.0 [3.0–4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0–5.0]; p<0.001 and 4.0 [3.0–5.0]; p<0.001) as well as after adding sagittal/coronal MIPS (4.0 [3.0–5.0] vs. 5.0[4.0–5.0]; p=0.01 and 4.0 [4.0–5.0]; p<0.001).

Conclusion

CTA axial plane alone was insufficient for CaW detection. CTA sagittal/coronal MIP reconstructions as well as oblique MPR reformats enhanced the accuracy and confidence related to CaW diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多平面重建改变了颈动脉网 CT 血管造影的诊断性能
导言颈动脉网(CaW)是一种被忽视的卒中病因,与高复发率和支架植入术相关。我们评估了不同计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)投影对 CaW 的诊断性能。方法连续纳入经薄层切面 CTA 诊断为无症状 CaW(31 例)、颈动脉粥样硬化(27 例)或正常颈动脉(49 例)的 65 岁患者。三位读者分别独立审阅了身份不明的 CTA,并记录了单独评估轴向平面、添加矢状/冠状最大强度投影(MIP)后以及斜向 MPR 重拍后的诊断和确定性水平。结果共读取到 93 个 CaW、81 个动脉粥样硬化和 147 个正常颈动脉。与动脉粥样硬化(87.7%;p<0.001)和颈动脉正常(83%;p<0.001)病例相比,仅使用 CTA 轴向投影,正确诊断的 CaW 病例较少(44.1%)。矢状/冠状 MIPS 提高了 CaW 的准确诊断率(44.1%-76.3%;p<0.001)。CaW检测的评分者间一致性从使用轴向投影时的k= 0.46(0.35-0.57)增加到使用矢状/冠状面时的k= 0.80(0.69-0.91)。与轴向+矢状/冠状 MIPS 相比,单独使用轴向投影检测 CaW 的灵敏度较低(44% 对 76%),但特异性相似(95% 对 96%)。加入矢状/冠状 MIPS 和斜位 MPR 后,检测动脉粥样硬化或正常颈动脉的准确性并没有提高。与动脉粥样硬化和正常颈动脉相比,仅使用轴位的 CaW 诊断确定性较低(3.0 [3.0-4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0];p<0.001 和 4.0 [3.0-5.0];p<0.001)以及添加矢状/冠状 MIPS 后(4.0 [3.0-5.0] vs. 5.0[4.0-5.0]; p=0.01 和 4.0 [4.0-5.0]; p<0.001)。CTA矢状/冠状MIP重建以及斜位MPR重塑提高了CaW诊断的准确性和可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Pre-operative collapsed disc is a negative prognostic factor of back-pain outcome in trans-foraminal endoscopic discectomy. A single cohort clinical study Validation of a diagnostic support tool for early recognition of cervical arterial dissection in primary care Tirofiban vs. aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Editorial Board Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus standard medical treatment in acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1