M. H. Salmani, Inayat Hussain, Sanaur Rehman, Himansh Kumar
{"title":"Environmental and performance impacts of 2-ethylhexyl nitrate and ethanol in diesel blends: A comprehensive study","authors":"M. H. Salmani, Inayat Hussain, Sanaur Rehman, Himansh Kumar","doi":"10.1063/5.0199235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the performance and emissions of a compression ignition engine fueled with blends of ethanol and petroleum diesel with 2-EHN (2 ethylhexyl nitrate) as a cetane improver. Three blends, named E20 (20% ethanol with 80% diesel), E20A (20% ethanol, 0.1% 2-EHN, and 79.9% petroleum diesel), E20B (20% ethanol, 0.2% 2-EHN, and 79.8% petroleum diesel), and petroleum diesel were analyzed for their brake thermal efficiency (BTHE), specific fuel consumption, net heat release rate, indicated thermal efficiency, and emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), CO2, hydrocarbon (HC), and NOx. The experiments were conducted at variable loading conditions and at compression ratio of 16.5. Results showed that at no load conditions, petroleum diesel exhibited higher indicated power (IP) compared to E20, E20A, and E20B. However, at full load conditions, blend E20B showed higher IP compared to petroleum diesel, E20, and E20A. The blend E20B at a compression ratio of 16.5 showed the highest BTHE of 27%, compared to petroleum diesel (25%) under full load conditions, making it a better performing fuel. However, at higher loads and compression ratio of 16.5, the blends E20A and E20B exhibited emissions of CO, HC, CO2, and NOx that were significantly higher than diesel and E20 at all load conditions. Specifically, at full load conditions and compression ratio of 16.5, the emissions for each fuel were as follows: CO emission for E20, E20A, and E20B was around 0.01%, much less than petroleum diesel (0.1%); HC emission for E20 (15 ppm), E20A (17 ppm), E20B (10 ppm) was much higher than petroleum diesel (2.5 ppm); CO2 emission for E20, E20A, and E20B was about 13% less than petroleum diesel (15%); and NOx emission for E20, E20A, and E20B was around 150 ppm, comparable with petroleum diesel (140 ppm). These results imply that further improvements are required in using ethanol blended alternate fuel in diesel engines with 2-EHN (cetane improver) to reduce emissions with improved performance.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0199235","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the performance and emissions of a compression ignition engine fueled with blends of ethanol and petroleum diesel with 2-EHN (2 ethylhexyl nitrate) as a cetane improver. Three blends, named E20 (20% ethanol with 80% diesel), E20A (20% ethanol, 0.1% 2-EHN, and 79.9% petroleum diesel), E20B (20% ethanol, 0.2% 2-EHN, and 79.8% petroleum diesel), and petroleum diesel were analyzed for their brake thermal efficiency (BTHE), specific fuel consumption, net heat release rate, indicated thermal efficiency, and emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), CO2, hydrocarbon (HC), and NOx. The experiments were conducted at variable loading conditions and at compression ratio of 16.5. Results showed that at no load conditions, petroleum diesel exhibited higher indicated power (IP) compared to E20, E20A, and E20B. However, at full load conditions, blend E20B showed higher IP compared to petroleum diesel, E20, and E20A. The blend E20B at a compression ratio of 16.5 showed the highest BTHE of 27%, compared to petroleum diesel (25%) under full load conditions, making it a better performing fuel. However, at higher loads and compression ratio of 16.5, the blends E20A and E20B exhibited emissions of CO, HC, CO2, and NOx that were significantly higher than diesel and E20 at all load conditions. Specifically, at full load conditions and compression ratio of 16.5, the emissions for each fuel were as follows: CO emission for E20, E20A, and E20B was around 0.01%, much less than petroleum diesel (0.1%); HC emission for E20 (15 ppm), E20A (17 ppm), E20B (10 ppm) was much higher than petroleum diesel (2.5 ppm); CO2 emission for E20, E20A, and E20B was about 13% less than petroleum diesel (15%); and NOx emission for E20, E20A, and E20B was around 150 ppm, comparable with petroleum diesel (140 ppm). These results imply that further improvements are required in using ethanol blended alternate fuel in diesel engines with 2-EHN (cetane improver) to reduce emissions with improved performance.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.