A tale of two societies: implications of conflicting Rh-immunoglobulin guidelines

AJOG global reports Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100380
Cara Heuser MD, MS , Rachel Flink-Bochacki MD, MPH , Jeffrey Sperling MD , Katharine Simmons MD, MPH , Kirsten Salmeen MD
{"title":"A tale of two societies: implications of conflicting Rh-immunoglobulin guidelines","authors":"Cara Heuser MD, MS ,&nbsp;Rachel Flink-Bochacki MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Sperling MD ,&nbsp;Katharine Simmons MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kirsten Salmeen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>National guidance conflicts regarding the use of RhD immune globulin administration &lt;12w. Recent Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) guidelines suggest liberal use of this product while other guidelines, including Society of Family Planning and the World Health Organization, propose a more conservative approach. Medicine is not practiced in a vacuum, and potential harms must include not only individual but communal and public health effects. We aim to critically examine the practical implications of the new SMFM guidelines with a focus on equity and access.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000741/pdfft?md5=3680cdeed5d1db06712f5e4e601f6be1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000741-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National guidance conflicts regarding the use of RhD immune globulin administration <12w. Recent Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) guidelines suggest liberal use of this product while other guidelines, including Society of Family Planning and the World Health Organization, propose a more conservative approach. Medicine is not practiced in a vacuum, and potential harms must include not only individual but communal and public health effects. We aim to critically examine the practical implications of the new SMFM guidelines with a focus on equity and access.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个社会的故事:相互矛盾的 Rh-Immunoglobulin 指南的影响
关于使用 RhD 免疫球蛋白 12w 的国家指南存在冲突。最近的母胎医学协会(SMFM)指南建议放开使用该产品,而包括计划生育协会和世界卫生组织在内的其他指南则建议采取更为保守的方法。医学不是在真空中进行的,潜在的危害不仅包括对个人的影响,还包括对社区和公共健康的影响。我们旨在批判性地研究新的 SMFM 指导方针的实际影响,重点关注公平性和可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparative analysis of blood pressure categorization using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in young women with presumed chronic hypertension with and without a history of pregnancy South-to-south collaboration: the role of healthcare experience exchange programs in building robust and reliable health systems in the global south Vaginal delivery in a woman with prune belly syndrome: a case report Magnitude, associated factors, and immediate outcomes of nonreassuring fetal heart rate status among laboring mothers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mortality in prenatally detected congenital small bowel obstructions: systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1