Quantification of Dosimetry Improvement With or Without Patient Surface Guidance

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Advances in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101570
Ke Sheng PhD, FAAPM, DABR , Minsong Cao PhD , Andrew Godley PhD , Mu-Han Lin PhD , Lukas Henze MEng , Laura Hammond MSc , Laurence Delombaerde PhD , Kirsten Hierholz Dipl -Ing , Jana Kouptsidis MSc
{"title":"Quantification of Dosimetry Improvement With or Without Patient Surface Guidance","authors":"Ke Sheng PhD, FAAPM, DABR ,&nbsp;Minsong Cao PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew Godley PhD ,&nbsp;Mu-Han Lin PhD ,&nbsp;Lukas Henze MEng ,&nbsp;Laura Hammond MSc ,&nbsp;Laurence Delombaerde PhD ,&nbsp;Kirsten Hierholz Dipl -Ing ,&nbsp;Jana Kouptsidis MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Noncoplanar beams and arcs are routinely used to improve dosimetry for intracranial cases, but their application for extracranial cases has been hampered by the risk of collision. This has led to conservative beam selection whose impact on plan dosimetry has not been previously studied.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>A full-body 3-dimensional patient surface was acquired using optical cameras for a single lung patient at the time of computed tomography simulation. Eight stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans were created for the patient, with varying degrees of noncoplanarity and deliverability. The plans included volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans ranging from simple, coplanar arcs to multiple noncoplanar arcs and IMRT beams. A total of 70 fields were created across the 8 plans, of which 21 fields were undeliverable with a 5-cm buffer. Organs-at-risk (OARs) metrics including R50, Dmax 2 cm from the PTV, lung V20, and chest wall V30 were evaluated. Five expert SBRT dosimetrists from 5 institutions evaluated field deliverability, with or without the guidance of the clearance map.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the dosimetry evaluation, a clear trend in increasing dosimetric compactness and OAR sparing is observed with increasing plan noncoplanarity. R50, Dmax 2 cm, lung V20, and chest wall V30 decreased 41%, 39%, 43%, and 57%, respectively, from plan 1 (2 coplanar partial arcs) to plan 8 (19 noncoplanar IMRT beams). In the observer tests, the expert dosimetrists’ ability to accurately discern beam deliverability because of collision significantly increases with the clearance map. The errors in predicting colliding fields were eliminated using the whole-body surface and clearance map, and the user was able to select fields based on plan quality and patient comfort instead of being overly conservative.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study shows that incorporating a personalized, whole-body clearance map in the treatment planning workflow can facilitate the adoption of noncoplanar beams or arcs that benefit the SBRT plan dosimetry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 9","pages":"Article 101570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001337/pdfft?md5=72abedba7c03476b91252b0d8940b6fe&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001337-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Noncoplanar beams and arcs are routinely used to improve dosimetry for intracranial cases, but their application for extracranial cases has been hampered by the risk of collision. This has led to conservative beam selection whose impact on plan dosimetry has not been previously studied.

Methods and Materials

A full-body 3-dimensional patient surface was acquired using optical cameras for a single lung patient at the time of computed tomography simulation. Eight stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans were created for the patient, with varying degrees of noncoplanarity and deliverability. The plans included volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans ranging from simple, coplanar arcs to multiple noncoplanar arcs and IMRT beams. A total of 70 fields were created across the 8 plans, of which 21 fields were undeliverable with a 5-cm buffer. Organs-at-risk (OARs) metrics including R50, Dmax 2 cm from the PTV, lung V20, and chest wall V30 were evaluated. Five expert SBRT dosimetrists from 5 institutions evaluated field deliverability, with or without the guidance of the clearance map.

Results

In the dosimetry evaluation, a clear trend in increasing dosimetric compactness and OAR sparing is observed with increasing plan noncoplanarity. R50, Dmax 2 cm, lung V20, and chest wall V30 decreased 41%, 39%, 43%, and 57%, respectively, from plan 1 (2 coplanar partial arcs) to plan 8 (19 noncoplanar IMRT beams). In the observer tests, the expert dosimetrists’ ability to accurately discern beam deliverability because of collision significantly increases with the clearance map. The errors in predicting colliding fields were eliminated using the whole-body surface and clearance map, and the user was able to select fields based on plan quality and patient comfort instead of being overly conservative.

Conclusion

The study shows that incorporating a personalized, whole-body clearance map in the treatment planning workflow can facilitate the adoption of noncoplanar beams or arcs that benefit the SBRT plan dosimetry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用或不采用患者体表引导,量化剂量测定的改进情况
目的非共面光束和弧线通常用于改善颅内病例的剂量测定,但在颅外病例中的应用却受到碰撞风险的阻碍。方法和材料在进行计算机断层扫描模拟时,使用光学相机获取了单肺部患者的全身三维表面。为患者创建了八种立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)计划,这些计划具有不同程度的非平面性和可投射性。这些计划包括容积调制弧形疗法和强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)计划,范围从简单的共面弧形到多个非共面弧形和 IMRT 射束。8 个计划共创建了 70 个场,其中 21 个场在 5 厘米缓冲区内无法传送。对风险器官(OARs)指标进行了评估,包括R50、距PTV 2厘米的Dmax、肺V20和胸壁V30。来自 5 家机构的 5 位 SBRT 剂量测定专家在清除图的指导下或不在清除图的指导下对野外投射能力进行了评估。从计划 1(2 个共面部分弧线)到计划 8(19 个非共面 IMRT 光束),R50、Dmax 2 cm、肺 V20 和胸壁 V30 分别下降了 41%、39%、43% 和 57%。在观察者测试中,随着间隙图的增加,剂量测定专家准确辨别因碰撞导致的射束可输送性的能力也显著提高。使用全身表面和间隙图消除了预测碰撞场的误差,用户能够根据计划质量和患者舒适度选择场,而不是过于保守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh A Versus Child-Pugh B/C Cirrhosis Editorial board Pegylated Interferon Combined With Low-Dose Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy for Advanced Stage Mycosis Fungoides: Two Case Reports and Literature Review Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Esophageal Cancer: First Clinical Experience and Dosimetric Benefits Prospective Trial on the Impact of Weekly Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Correction on Mean Heart Dose in Breast Cancer Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1