Real-time precision spraying application for tobacco plants

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Smart agricultural technology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100497
{"title":"Real-time precision spraying application for tobacco plants","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper introduces a precision agriculture application aimed at mitigating the excessive utilization of agricultural chemicals, including pesticides and fungicides during crop spraying. The prevailing spraying techniques face two principle challenges: first, the indiscriminate dispensation of chemicals irrespective of plant size and requirements and second, the farmer's exposure to health hazards. To tackle these issues, a detection and segmentation model employing both YOLOv5 and YOLOv6 architectures is proposed and a comparative assessment of their accuracies within the same model category is conducted. The training dataset originates from a subset of the TobSet dataset, while the evaluation of the trained models is executed using publicly accessible aerial videos/images from available repository. The best detection accuracy achieved for the tobacco plant model size is observed with YOLOv6s and the YOLOv5-segmentation model, yielding accuracies of 95% and 94.8%, respectively. Additional performance metrics such as precision, recall, area under the PR-curve, inference time, and NMS per image are also compared between the two models. The YOLOv5-segmentation model excels by outperforming the YOLOv6s model in precision, recall score, and area under the PR-curve whereas slightly extended inference time and NMS per image duration are noted for the YOLOv5-segmentation model and the speed performance is comparable for the two models. Subsequently, the evaluation of these two models is conducted on the drone videos, which were recorded during drone traversal at a speed of 2 km/hr. The results demonstrate superiority of YOLOv5-segmentation model over the YOLOv6s model, with detection accuracies of 98.1% and 97.3%, respectively. These findings indicate the potential of integrating YOLOv5 segmentation models in precision spraying applications and contribute in improving the overall agricultural practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001023/pdfft?md5=94fc464b49049dc4477a72101693e032&pid=1-s2.0-S2772375524001023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces a precision agriculture application aimed at mitigating the excessive utilization of agricultural chemicals, including pesticides and fungicides during crop spraying. The prevailing spraying techniques face two principle challenges: first, the indiscriminate dispensation of chemicals irrespective of plant size and requirements and second, the farmer's exposure to health hazards. To tackle these issues, a detection and segmentation model employing both YOLOv5 and YOLOv6 architectures is proposed and a comparative assessment of their accuracies within the same model category is conducted. The training dataset originates from a subset of the TobSet dataset, while the evaluation of the trained models is executed using publicly accessible aerial videos/images from available repository. The best detection accuracy achieved for the tobacco plant model size is observed with YOLOv6s and the YOLOv5-segmentation model, yielding accuracies of 95% and 94.8%, respectively. Additional performance metrics such as precision, recall, area under the PR-curve, inference time, and NMS per image are also compared between the two models. The YOLOv5-segmentation model excels by outperforming the YOLOv6s model in precision, recall score, and area under the PR-curve whereas slightly extended inference time and NMS per image duration are noted for the YOLOv5-segmentation model and the speed performance is comparable for the two models. Subsequently, the evaluation of these two models is conducted on the drone videos, which were recorded during drone traversal at a speed of 2 km/hr. The results demonstrate superiority of YOLOv5-segmentation model over the YOLOv6s model, with detection accuracies of 98.1% and 97.3%, respectively. These findings indicate the potential of integrating YOLOv5 segmentation models in precision spraying applications and contribute in improving the overall agricultural practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烟草植物的实时精确喷洒应用
本文介绍了一种精准农业应用,旨在减少作物喷洒过程中农业化学品(包括杀虫剂和杀菌剂)的过度使用。现有的喷洒技术面临两个主要挑战:一是不考虑植物的大小和需求而盲目喷洒化学品;二是农民面临健康风险。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一种检测和分割模型,同时采用 YOLOv5 和 YOLOv6 架构,并对同一模型类别中的准确性进行了比较评估。训练数据集来源于 TobSet 数据集的一个子集,而对训练模型的评估则使用了现有资源库中可公开获取的航空视频/图像。YOLOv6s 和 YOLOv5-segmentation 模型的烟草植物模型尺寸检测准确率最高,分别达到 95% 和 94.8%。此外,还比较了两种模型的其他性能指标,如精确度、召回率、PR 曲线下面积、推理时间和每幅图像的 NMS。YOLOv5-segmentation模型在精确度、召回分数和PR曲线下面积方面优于YOLOv6s模型,而YOLOv5-segmentation模型的推理时间和每幅图像的NMS持续时间略有延长,两种模型的速度性能相当。随后,在无人机以 2 公里/小时的速度穿越时记录的无人机视频中对这两种模型进行了评估。结果表明,YOLOv5-segmentation 模型优于 YOLOv6s 模型,检测准确率分别为 98.1% 和 97.3%。这些研究结果表明,在精准喷洒应用中集成 YOLOv5 细分模型具有很大的潜力,有助于改善整体农业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep learning-based sow posture classifier using colour and depth images Assessing plant pigmentation impacts: A novel approach integrating UAV and multispectral data to analyze atrazine metabolite effects from soil contamination Field scale wheat yield prediction using ensemble machine learning techniques Developing a reference method for indirect measurement of pasture evapotranspiration at sub-meter spatial resolution Public irrigation decision support systems (IDSS) in Italy: Description, evaluation and national context overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1