Lydia E. Federico MPhil , Joshua M. Diamond MD, MSCE , Malek Kamoun MD, PhD , Maria M. Crespo MD , Christian A. Bermudez MD , Andrew M. Courtwright MD, PhD
{"title":"Donor Specific Antibodies in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Bridged Lung Transplant Recipients","authors":"Lydia E. Federico MPhil , Joshua M. Diamond MD, MSCE , Malek Kamoun MD, PhD , Maria M. Crespo MD , Christian A. Bermudez MD , Andrew M. Courtwright MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used as a bridge to lung transplantation. Although other mechanical circulatory support devices have been associated with anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody formation, including de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), it is unknown whether ECMO is a sensitizing exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients. We compared dnDSA development in ECMO-bridged and non-ECMO exposed recipients. We also assessed differences in chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival between ECMO-bridged recipients with and without dnDSA, and between those who developed dnDSA with and without ECMO bridge.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 299 transplant recipients, 48 were ECMO-bridged and 251 were non-ECMO exposed. dnDSA developed in 33.3% of ECMO-bridged and 21.5% of non-ECMO exposed recipients. ECMO was associated with dnDSA development in bivariate (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08, 95% CI, 1.19-3.64, <em>P</em> = .01) but not multivariate analysis after adjusting for known confounders (HR, 1.10, 95% CI, 0.50-2.42, <em>P</em> = .82). Higher posttransplant transfusion volume was independently associated with dnDSA development (HR, 4.68, 95% CI, 2.25-9.72, <em>P</em> < .001). ECMO-bridged recipients with dnDSA did not have worse adjusted chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival than those without dnDSA (HR, 0.35, 95% CI, 0.07-1.87, <em>P</em> = .22) or compared to non-ECMO exposed recipients with dnDSA (HR, 0.40, 95% CI, 0.08-2.00, <em>P</em> = .27).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A more restrictive posttransplant transfusion threshold among ECMO-bridged lung transplant recipients may reduce the risk of dnDSA. Surveillance for dnDSA, at least among ECMO-bridged recipients, may only be necessary in the presence of allograft dysfunction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 836-841"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277299312400264X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used as a bridge to lung transplantation. Although other mechanical circulatory support devices have been associated with anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody formation, including de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), it is unknown whether ECMO is a sensitizing exposure.
Methods
This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients. We compared dnDSA development in ECMO-bridged and non-ECMO exposed recipients. We also assessed differences in chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival between ECMO-bridged recipients with and without dnDSA, and between those who developed dnDSA with and without ECMO bridge.
Results
Among 299 transplant recipients, 48 were ECMO-bridged and 251 were non-ECMO exposed. dnDSA developed in 33.3% of ECMO-bridged and 21.5% of non-ECMO exposed recipients. ECMO was associated with dnDSA development in bivariate (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08, 95% CI, 1.19-3.64, P = .01) but not multivariate analysis after adjusting for known confounders (HR, 1.10, 95% CI, 0.50-2.42, P = .82). Higher posttransplant transfusion volume was independently associated with dnDSA development (HR, 4.68, 95% CI, 2.25-9.72, P < .001). ECMO-bridged recipients with dnDSA did not have worse adjusted chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival than those without dnDSA (HR, 0.35, 95% CI, 0.07-1.87, P = .22) or compared to non-ECMO exposed recipients with dnDSA (HR, 0.40, 95% CI, 0.08-2.00, P = .27).
Conclusions
A more restrictive posttransplant transfusion threshold among ECMO-bridged lung transplant recipients may reduce the risk of dnDSA. Surveillance for dnDSA, at least among ECMO-bridged recipients, may only be necessary in the presence of allograft dysfunction.