{"title":"Validation of the IRI-2020 model for the topside-plasmasphere using GNSS TEC measurements","authors":"Nina Servan-Schreiber , Malini Aggarwal , Yuyang Huang , Minwook Kang , Abdalla Shaker , Dieter Bilitza","doi":"10.1016/j.asr.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>The 2020 update of the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model introduces a new topside option, COR2, for the formulation of its electron density profile, as well as two plasmaspheric extension options based on the GCPM model of </span><span><span>Gallagher et al. (2000)</span></span> and the IMAGE/RPI model of <span><span>Ozhogin et al. (2012)</span></span><span>. We validate the COR2-Gallagher and COR2-Ozhogin topside-plasmasphere options of IRI-2020 using GNSS VTEC measurements and compare them to the NeQuick model used as the default option in IRI-2016. VTEC data from a total of 21 GNSS ground-based receivers are compared to predictions of the IRI model, ranging from low (< 30°) to middle (30°-60°) magnetic latitudes, during high (year 2014; F10.7</span><span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo></mrow></math></span>140 sfu) and low (year 2019; F10.7<span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo></mrow></math></span>70 sfu) solar activity. Peak plasma frequency (foF2) data from co-located digisondes are ingested into the model to ensure the relevance of the comparison. The three topside-plasmasphere options perform equally well at mid-latitudes (RMSE<span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo></mrow></math></span>3 TECU). At low latitudes, the NeQuick option (RMSE<span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo></mrow></math></span>9 TECU) performs better than both the COR2-Gallagher and COR2-Ozhogin options (RMSE > 10 TECU). For all options, the modeled VTEC is consistently overestimated during the autumn/winter daytime at mid-latitudes regardless of solar activity, and throughout the day at low latitudes during low solar activity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50850,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Space Research","volume":"75 5","pages":"Pages 4217-4229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Space Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117724006835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The 2020 update of the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model introduces a new topside option, COR2, for the formulation of its electron density profile, as well as two plasmaspheric extension options based on the GCPM model of Gallagher et al. (2000) and the IMAGE/RPI model of Ozhogin et al. (2012). We validate the COR2-Gallagher and COR2-Ozhogin topside-plasmasphere options of IRI-2020 using GNSS VTEC measurements and compare them to the NeQuick model used as the default option in IRI-2016. VTEC data from a total of 21 GNSS ground-based receivers are compared to predictions of the IRI model, ranging from low (< 30°) to middle (30°-60°) magnetic latitudes, during high (year 2014; F10.7140 sfu) and low (year 2019; F10.770 sfu) solar activity. Peak plasma frequency (foF2) data from co-located digisondes are ingested into the model to ensure the relevance of the comparison. The three topside-plasmasphere options perform equally well at mid-latitudes (RMSE3 TECU). At low latitudes, the NeQuick option (RMSE9 TECU) performs better than both the COR2-Gallagher and COR2-Ozhogin options (RMSE > 10 TECU). For all options, the modeled VTEC is consistently overestimated during the autumn/winter daytime at mid-latitudes regardless of solar activity, and throughout the day at low latitudes during low solar activity.
期刊介绍:
The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth''s surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc.
NB: Please note that manuscripts related to life sciences as related to space are no more accepted for submission to Advances in Space Research. Such manuscripts should now be submitted to the new COSPAR Journal Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR).
All submissions are reviewed by two scientists in the field. COSPAR is an interdisciplinary scientific organization concerned with the progress of space research on an international scale. Operating under the rules of ICSU, COSPAR ignores political considerations and considers all questions solely from the scientific viewpoint.