Impact of serous fluid volume on next-generation sequencing: a significant step forward for optimization of serous fluid sample collection

Shaham Beg MD, Kemin Xu MD, James P. Solomon MD, Susan A. Alperstein CT (ASCP), Momin T. Siddiqui MD
{"title":"Impact of serous fluid volume on next-generation sequencing: a significant step forward for optimization of serous fluid sample collection","authors":"Shaham Beg MD,&nbsp;Kemin Xu MD,&nbsp;James P. Solomon MD,&nbsp;Susan A. Alperstein CT (ASCP),&nbsp;Momin T. Siddiqui MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Current literature lacks data regarding the influence of serous fluid volume (SFV) on next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed on malignant cases. In this study, we highlight the impact of SFV and other parameters influencing the outcome of NGS analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We evaluated 827 samples of serous fluids from 607 patients. Of these, 72 samples underwent NGS analysis. Effusion volume, tumor cellularity, DNA, and RNA quality metrics, as well as clinicopathologic and molecular data were evaluated. Pleural fluid accounted for 56.3% of the fluid samples collected. The most common primary tumor site was gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary, adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type. Overall mean volume was 293 mL. The mean Qubit DNA of the 72 effusion samples that underwent NGS analysis was 14.3 ng/μL and mean Qubit RNA was 28.2 ng/μL. The mean Qubit DNA concentration increases in SFV up to 100 mL only.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No correlation exists between SFV and mean tumor cellularity. In addition, 74.6% (50 of 67) of sequenced samples showed oncogenic drivers; <em>KRAS</em> was the most common driver followed by <em>EGFR.</em> Three cases displayed <em>ALK</em> fusions, and 1 case displayed <em>NTRK1</em> fusion. The DNA yield is higher in SFV of 100 mL as a cutoff. Beyond 100 mL, there is no impact of SFV on DNA yield. SFV does not impact RNA yield and mean tumor cellularity. Effusion samples should be submitted for molecular testing despite low tumor cellularity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results as a pilot study are important in optimization of SFV for both diagnosis as well as NGS analysis for improving management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Pages 397-405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213294524000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Current literature lacks data regarding the influence of serous fluid volume (SFV) on next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed on malignant cases. In this study, we highlight the impact of SFV and other parameters influencing the outcome of NGS analysis.

Materials and methods

We evaluated 827 samples of serous fluids from 607 patients. Of these, 72 samples underwent NGS analysis. Effusion volume, tumor cellularity, DNA, and RNA quality metrics, as well as clinicopathologic and molecular data were evaluated. Pleural fluid accounted for 56.3% of the fluid samples collected. The most common primary tumor site was gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary, adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type. Overall mean volume was 293 mL. The mean Qubit DNA of the 72 effusion samples that underwent NGS analysis was 14.3 ng/μL and mean Qubit RNA was 28.2 ng/μL. The mean Qubit DNA concentration increases in SFV up to 100 mL only.

Results

No correlation exists between SFV and mean tumor cellularity. In addition, 74.6% (50 of 67) of sequenced samples showed oncogenic drivers; KRAS was the most common driver followed by EGFR. Three cases displayed ALK fusions, and 1 case displayed NTRK1 fusion. The DNA yield is higher in SFV of 100 mL as a cutoff. Beyond 100 mL, there is no impact of SFV on DNA yield. SFV does not impact RNA yield and mean tumor cellularity. Effusion samples should be submitted for molecular testing despite low tumor cellularity.

Conclusions

Our results as a pilot study are important in optimization of SFV for both diagnosis as well as NGS analysis for improving management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清液体积对下一代测序的影响:优化血清样本采集的重要一步。
导言目前的文献缺乏有关浆液容量(SFV)对恶性病例进行的下一代测序(NGS)影响的数据。在本研究中,我们强调了 SFV 及其他参数对 NGS 分析结果的影响。其中 72 份样本进行了 NGS 分析。我们评估了积液量、肿瘤细胞度、DNA 和 RNA 质量指标以及临床病理和分子数据。胸腔积液占所采集积液样本的 56.3%。最常见的原发肿瘤部位是胃肠道/胰胆管,腺癌是最常见的组织学类型。总体平均体积为 293 毫升。进行 NGS 分析的 72 份流出液样本的平均 Qubit DNA 浓度为 14.3 纳克/微升,平均 Qubit RNA 浓度为 28.2 纳克/微升。结果 SFV 与平均肿瘤细胞度之间不存在相关性。此外,74.6%(67 个样本中的 50 个)的测序样本显示了致癌驱动因子;KRAS 是最常见的驱动因子,其次是表皮生长因子受体。3例显示ALK融合,1例显示NTRK1融合。以 100 mL 为临界值的 SFV DNA 得率较高。超过 100 mL 后,SFV 对 DNA 产量没有影响。SFV 不影响 RNA 产量和平均肿瘤细胞度。尽管肿瘤细胞度较低,但仍应提交出液样本进行分子检测。结论作为一项试点研究,我们的结果对于优化 SFV 诊断和 NGS 分析以改善管理非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
FNA diagnosis of secondary malignancies in the parotid gland: over 20 years of experience from a single institute. Application of the WHO reporting system for soft tissue cytopathology with assessment of risk of malignancy: a retrospective study. Triage options for positive high-risk HPV results from HPV-based cervical cancer screening: a review of the potential alternatives to Papanicolaou test cytology. A review of the performance of urinary cytology with a focus on atypia, upper tract and updates on novel ancillary testing. Cytology fine-needle aspiration and surgical pathology core needle biopsy reporting: blurred lines or battle lines?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1