A survey on scalable consensus algorithms for blockchain technology

Ankit Kumar Jain , Nishant Gupta , Brij B. Gupta
{"title":"A survey on scalable consensus algorithms for blockchain technology","authors":"Ankit Kumar Jain ,&nbsp;Nishant Gupta ,&nbsp;Brij B. Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.csa.2024.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The process of reaching an agreement on a value within a distributed network, known as a consensus problem, is a defining feature of blockchain. This consensus problem can be seen in various applications like load balancing, transaction validation in blockchain, and distributed computing. In recent years, many researchers have provided solutions to this problem. Hence we have presented a survey in which we delved into blockchain consensus algorithms and conducted a comparative analysis of all the consensus algorithms to provide information about each protocol’s advantages and drawbacks. This survey starts with the standard proof-of-work consensus protocol applied in bitcoin cryptocurrency and its limitations on the ground of the following parameters: throughput (transactions per second), latency, forks, fault tolerance, double spending attacks, and power consumption. The rest of the consensus algorithms in this paper have been systematically covered to address the limitations of proof-of-work. This paper also covered Raft and PBFT consensus algorithms suitable for permissioned networks. Although the PBFT consensus protocol has a high throughput and a low latency, it has limited node scalability. The PBFT has a low byzantine fault tolerant rate. This paper also covers PoEWAL for blockchain-based IoT applications and WBFT, which prevents corrupt nodes from taking part in consensus. A comparative analysis of the consensus algorithms provides an explicit knowledge of the present research, which also offers guidance for future study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100351,"journal":{"name":"Cyber Security and Applications","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772918424000316/pdfft?md5=3bf0696549ef3be318eef483a00ad2e8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772918424000316-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyber Security and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772918424000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The process of reaching an agreement on a value within a distributed network, known as a consensus problem, is a defining feature of blockchain. This consensus problem can be seen in various applications like load balancing, transaction validation in blockchain, and distributed computing. In recent years, many researchers have provided solutions to this problem. Hence we have presented a survey in which we delved into blockchain consensus algorithms and conducted a comparative analysis of all the consensus algorithms to provide information about each protocol’s advantages and drawbacks. This survey starts with the standard proof-of-work consensus protocol applied in bitcoin cryptocurrency and its limitations on the ground of the following parameters: throughput (transactions per second), latency, forks, fault tolerance, double spending attacks, and power consumption. The rest of the consensus algorithms in this paper have been systematically covered to address the limitations of proof-of-work. This paper also covered Raft and PBFT consensus algorithms suitable for permissioned networks. Although the PBFT consensus protocol has a high throughput and a low latency, it has limited node scalability. The PBFT has a low byzantine fault tolerant rate. This paper also covers PoEWAL for blockchain-based IoT applications and WBFT, which prevents corrupt nodes from taking part in consensus. A comparative analysis of the consensus algorithms provides an explicit knowledge of the present research, which also offers guidance for future study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区块链技术可扩展共识算法概览
在分布式网络中就某个值达成一致的过程,即共识问题,是区块链的一个决定性特征。在负载平衡、区块链中的交易验证和分布式计算等各种应用中都可以看到这种共识问题。近年来,许多研究人员都为这一问题提供了解决方案。因此,我们提交了一份调查报告,其中我们深入研究了区块链共识算法,并对所有共识算法进行了比较分析,以提供有关每个协议优缺点的信息。本调查从比特币加密货币中应用的标准工作证明共识协议及其在以下参数方面的局限性开始:吞吐量(每秒交易量)、延迟、分叉、容错、双重支出攻击和功耗。本文系统地介绍了其他共识算法,以解决工作证明的局限性。本文还介绍了适用于许可网络的 Raft 和 PBFT 共识算法。虽然 PBFT 共识协议具有高吞吐量和低延迟的特点,但它的节点可扩展性有限。PBFT 的拜占庭容错率较低。本文还介绍了适用于基于区块链的物联网应用的 PoEWAL 和防止腐败节点参与共识的 WBFT。对共识算法的比较分析为本研究提供了明确的知识,也为今后的研究提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep learning-driven defense strategies for mitigating DDoS attacks in cloud computing environments Privacy-preserving security of IoT networks: A comparative analysis of methods and applications Earthworm optimization algorithm based cascade LSTM-GRU model for android malware detection A survey on intrusion detection system in IoT networks Comparison of mitigating DDoS attacks in software defined networking and IoT platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1