Optimization of cervical cord synthetic T1-weighted MRI for enhancing clinical application in neurodegenerative spinal cord disorders

Simon Schading-Sassenhausen, Maryam Seif, N. Weiskopf, Patrick Freund
{"title":"Optimization of cervical cord synthetic T1-weighted MRI for enhancing clinical application in neurodegenerative spinal cord disorders","authors":"Simon Schading-Sassenhausen, Maryam Seif, N. Weiskopf, Patrick Freund","doi":"10.1162/imag_a_00225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Synthetic MRI offers the advantage of reducing acquisition time and enhancing flexibility through the reconstruction of various contrast weightings from a single set of MRI scans. However, the use of synthetic T1-weighted (synT1-w) MRI can lead to potentially biased measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) in the spinal cord when compared to conventionally acquired T1-weighted MRI. This disparity can have implications for comparability and sensitivity of MRI in assessing disease progression or treatment effects in neurodegenerative spinal cord disorders. Thus, this study aimed at improving the accuracy (i.e., difference between synthetic and acquired MRI) of cervical cord CSA measurements (C1-C3 level) based on synT1-w MRI implementing a longitudinal data set acquired from 23 acute spinal cord injury (SCI) patients and 21 healthy controls over 2 years. Moreover, the validity of using synT1-w MRI for tracking cervical cord atrophy following SCI over 2 years was verified. SynT1-w images were reconstructed from quantitative maps of proton density, longitudinal, and effective transverse relaxation rates derived from a multi-parameter mapping protocol. The results showed a minimal bias of -0.31 mm2 (-0.5%) in CSA measurements based on synT1-w compared to acquired MRI. Estimates of atrophy rates and average CSA were comparable between synthetic and acquired MRI. A sample size estimation for detecting treatment effects on CSA atrophy after 2 years following SCI revealed that the required sample size is reduced by 13.5% using synT1-w instead of acquired MRI. This study shows high accuracy of synT1-w MRI and demonstrates its applicability in clinical studies for optimizing long MRI protocols.","PeriodicalId":507939,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Neuroscience","volume":"23 12","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Synthetic MRI offers the advantage of reducing acquisition time and enhancing flexibility through the reconstruction of various contrast weightings from a single set of MRI scans. However, the use of synthetic T1-weighted (synT1-w) MRI can lead to potentially biased measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) in the spinal cord when compared to conventionally acquired T1-weighted MRI. This disparity can have implications for comparability and sensitivity of MRI in assessing disease progression or treatment effects in neurodegenerative spinal cord disorders. Thus, this study aimed at improving the accuracy (i.e., difference between synthetic and acquired MRI) of cervical cord CSA measurements (C1-C3 level) based on synT1-w MRI implementing a longitudinal data set acquired from 23 acute spinal cord injury (SCI) patients and 21 healthy controls over 2 years. Moreover, the validity of using synT1-w MRI for tracking cervical cord atrophy following SCI over 2 years was verified. SynT1-w images were reconstructed from quantitative maps of proton density, longitudinal, and effective transverse relaxation rates derived from a multi-parameter mapping protocol. The results showed a minimal bias of -0.31 mm2 (-0.5%) in CSA measurements based on synT1-w compared to acquired MRI. Estimates of atrophy rates and average CSA were comparable between synthetic and acquired MRI. A sample size estimation for detecting treatment effects on CSA atrophy after 2 years following SCI revealed that the required sample size is reduced by 13.5% using synT1-w instead of acquired MRI. This study shows high accuracy of synT1-w MRI and demonstrates its applicability in clinical studies for optimizing long MRI protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化颈髓合成 T1 加权磁共振成像,提高神经退行性脊髓疾病的临床应用水平
摘要 合成磁共振成像具有缩短采集时间和提高灵活性的优点,可通过单组磁共振成像扫描重建各种对比度加权。然而,与传统的 T1 加权磁共振成像相比,使用合成 T1 加权(synT1-w)磁共振成像可能会导致脊髓横截面积(CSA)的测量结果出现偏差。这种差异会影响磁共振成像在评估神经退行性脊髓疾病的疾病进展或治疗效果时的可比性和灵敏度。因此,本研究旨在提高基于 synT1-w 核磁共振成像的颈髓 CSA 测量(C1-C3 水平)的准确性(即合成核磁共振成像与获得核磁共振成像之间的差异),该研究采用了从 23 名急性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者和 21 名健康对照者处获得的纵向数据集,历时两年。此外,还验证了使用 synT1-w MRI 追踪 SCI 患者 2 年颈脊髓萎缩情况的有效性。SynT1-w 图像由质子密度、纵向弛豫率和有效横向弛豫率的定量图重建,这些定量图来自多参数绘图方案。结果显示,与获得的核磁共振成像相比,基于 synT1-w 的 CSA 测量偏差最小,为-0.31 平方毫米(-0.5%)。合成磁共振成像和获取磁共振成像对萎缩率和平均 CSA 的估计值相当。对检测 SCI 2 年后 CSA 萎缩治疗效果的样本量进行估算后发现,使用 synT1-w 而非获得性 MRI 所需的样本量减少了 13.5%。这项研究显示了合成 T1-w 磁共振成像的高准确性,并证明了其在临床研究中优化长磁共振成像方案的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization and validation of multi-echo, multi-contrast SAGE acquisition in fMRI BOLD fMRI responses to amplitude-modulated sounds across age in adult listeners Developmental trajectories of the default mode, frontoparietal, and salience networks from the third trimester through the newborn period GABA levels decline with age: A longitudinal study Unveiling hidden sources of dynamic functional connectome through a novel regularized blind source separation approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1