208 Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Handover Audit Using ‘RAAAIDDSS’ Method

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/bjs/znae163.146
A. Jamalludin, G. Elegio, H. Abu Shamat, E. Haxhiaj
{"title":"208 Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Handover Audit Using ‘RAAAIDDSS’ Method","authors":"A. Jamalludin, G. Elegio, H. Abu Shamat, E. Haxhiaj","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znae163.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Patient handover is vital in ensuring patient safety and quality of patient care, in line with Royal College of Surgeons Guidance of Safe Handover (2007). ‘RAAAIDDSSS’ method stands for resection (surgery), airway, anticoagulant, antibiotics, intake, drain, Doppler, serology, scans, structure (plans). It shows comprehensive clinical updates for planning best management, ensuring smooth flow of activity and reducing morbidity. This method is ideal as our surgical patients often have altered airway anatomy and airway plans and consequently variable feeding routes.\n \n \n \n To audit the compliance of RAAAIDDSSS method.\n \n \n \n This is a prospective audit in Head and Neck Surgery Department of University College London Hospital (UCLH), done within 4 weeks across June-July 2023, with sample (n=100) for first cycle and (n=81) for second cycle. The format was implemented in handover sheet and case presentation was run according to this method.\n \n \n \n First cycle showed good compliance to RAAAIDDSSS handover method. The least compliant component is ‘structure’ which showed only 62%. Results were presented in grand ward round. Second cycle showed significant improvement. Almost all components showed 100% compliance, except for the ‘intake’, which was 90%. Overall shows positive compliance to this handover method.\n \n \n \n UCLH Head and Neck Surgery has strict compliance with the RAAIDDSSS method. This audit brings significant positive impacts and changes to clinical practice in terms of patient safety, service efficiency and quality of patient care. This audit also holds valuable clinical value and opens doors for further audits as well as project expansion regionally and nationally.\n","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae163.146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient handover is vital in ensuring patient safety and quality of patient care, in line with Royal College of Surgeons Guidance of Safe Handover (2007). ‘RAAAIDDSSS’ method stands for resection (surgery), airway, anticoagulant, antibiotics, intake, drain, Doppler, serology, scans, structure (plans). It shows comprehensive clinical updates for planning best management, ensuring smooth flow of activity and reducing morbidity. This method is ideal as our surgical patients often have altered airway anatomy and airway plans and consequently variable feeding routes. To audit the compliance of RAAAIDDSSS method. This is a prospective audit in Head and Neck Surgery Department of University College London Hospital (UCLH), done within 4 weeks across June-July 2023, with sample (n=100) for first cycle and (n=81) for second cycle. The format was implemented in handover sheet and case presentation was run according to this method. First cycle showed good compliance to RAAAIDDSSS handover method. The least compliant component is ‘structure’ which showed only 62%. Results were presented in grand ward round. Second cycle showed significant improvement. Almost all components showed 100% compliance, except for the ‘intake’, which was 90%. Overall shows positive compliance to this handover method. UCLH Head and Neck Surgery has strict compliance with the RAAIDDSSS method. This audit brings significant positive impacts and changes to clinical practice in terms of patient safety, service efficiency and quality of patient care. This audit also holds valuable clinical value and opens doors for further audits as well as project expansion regionally and nationally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
208 使用 "RAAAIDDSS "方法进行头颈部肿瘤外科交接审计
根据英国皇家外科学院《安全交接指导》(2007 年),患者交接对于确保患者安全和患者护理质量至关重要。RAAAIDDSSS "方法代表切除(手术)、气道、抗凝、抗生素、摄入、引流、多普勒、血清学、扫描、结构(计划)。它显示了全面的临床更新,可用于规划最佳管理,确保活动顺利进行并降低发病率。这种方法非常理想,因为我们的手术患者通常会改变气道解剖结构和气道计划,进食途径也会随之改变。 审核 RAAAIDDSSS 方法的合规性。 这是在伦敦大学学院医院(UCLH)头颈外科进行的前瞻性审核,在 2023 年 6 月至 7 月的 4 周内完成,第一周期的样本数(n=100)和第二周期的样本数(n=81)。交接单中采用了该格式,病例演示也按照该方法进行。 第一周期显示出对 RAAAIDDSSS 移交方法的良好遵从性。遵守率最低的部分是 "结构",仅为 62%。结果在大查房中进行了展示。第二周期的情况有了明显改善。除 "摄入 "为 90% 外,几乎所有部分都 100% 符合要求。总体而言,这种交接方法得到了积极的遵守。 UCLH 头颈外科严格遵守 RAAIDDSSS 方法。此次审核在患者安全、服务效率和患者护理质量方面为临床实践带来了重大的积极影响和改变。该审核还具有宝贵的临床价值,为进一步开展审核以及在地区和全国范围内扩展项目打开了大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Curative-intent ablation margins (A0) for colorectal liver metastasis: more burning questions. Disease-specific survival outcomes for patients after locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: observational cohort study. Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial. Identification of A0 minimum ablative margins for colorectal liver metastases: multicentre, retrospective study using deformable CT registration and artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation. Neoadjuvant 177Lu-DOTATATE for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NEOLUPANET): multicentre phase II study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1