Responding to the EU Green Deal: A Proactive Approach to Trade and Green Industrial Policy in Africa

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2024057
Colette van der Ven, Sunayana Sasmal
{"title":"Responding to the EU Green Deal: A Proactive Approach to Trade and Green Industrial Policy in Africa","authors":"Colette van der Ven, Sunayana Sasmal","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2024057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The EU Green Deal and its host of accompanying trade measures have put its trading partners on the defense, scrambling to find the right policy response. The approach adopted by many developing countries and Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) is mostly reactive. This article argues that for the EU Green Deal to be used as a development tool, EU trading partners must go beyond reacting to EU green trade measures, and instead adopt a proactive approach. This would effectively entail linking a changing EU market economy that is increasingly focused on sustainability objectives, to development and climate priorities in the EU trading partner. This article illustrates what a proactive approach to the EU Green Deal could look like for African countries, with a focus on the EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) and the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA). It further puts forth the argument for leveraging legal frameworks such as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), and charts policies that serve African interests. For both the ESPR and CRMA, this article makes policy recommendations that African countries may consider when framing domestic policy approaches, well as in their engagements with international partners.\n","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2024057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The EU Green Deal and its host of accompanying trade measures have put its trading partners on the defense, scrambling to find the right policy response. The approach adopted by many developing countries and Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) is mostly reactive. This article argues that for the EU Green Deal to be used as a development tool, EU trading partners must go beyond reacting to EU green trade measures, and instead adopt a proactive approach. This would effectively entail linking a changing EU market economy that is increasingly focused on sustainability objectives, to development and climate priorities in the EU trading partner. This article illustrates what a proactive approach to the EU Green Deal could look like for African countries, with a focus on the EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) and the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA). It further puts forth the argument for leveraging legal frameworks such as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), and charts policies that serve African interests. For both the ESPR and CRMA, this article makes policy recommendations that African countries may consider when framing domestic policy approaches, well as in their engagements with international partners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对欧盟绿色交易:非洲贸易和绿色工业政策的积极方法
欧盟的 "绿色交易 "及其配套的一系列贸易措施使其贸易伙伴惶惶不可终日,争相寻找正确的应对政策。许多发展中国家和最不发达国家(LDCs)采取的方法大多是被动应对。本文认为,要将欧盟绿色交易作为一种发展工具,欧盟的贸易伙伴就必须超越对欧盟绿色贸易措施的反应,转而采取一种积极主动的方法。这将有效地把日益注重可持续发展目标的不断变化的欧盟市场经济与欧盟贸易伙伴的发展和气候优先事项联系起来。本文以欧盟《可持续产品生态设计法规》(ESPR)和《关键原材料法》(CRMA)为重点,说明了非洲国家可以采取何种积极主动的方式来实施欧盟绿色贸易措施。报告还进一步提出了利用非洲大陆自由贸易区(AfCFTA)等法律框架以及服务于非洲利益的图表政策的论点。对于《非洲大陆自由贸易区条例》和《非洲大陆重要原材料法》,本文提出了政策建议,非洲国家在制定国内政策方针以及与国际伙伴接触时可加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
The EU 11th and 12th Packages of Sanctions Against Russia: How Far is the EU Willing to Go Extraterritorially? Special Procedures the Responsible Person(s): What Would Change under the EU Commission’s Reform Proposal? Positioning African Maritime Services as Key Enablers of the Emerging Single African Market Responding to the EU Green Deal: A Proactive Approach to Trade and Green Industrial Policy in Africa Navigating Digital Sovereignty: Implications for African Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1