Evaluating quality of ontology-driven conceptual models abstractions

IF 2.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Data & Knowledge Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.datak.2024.102342
{"title":"Evaluating quality of ontology-driven conceptual models abstractions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.datak.2024.102342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The complexity of an (ontology-driven) conceptual model highly correlates with the complexity of the domain and software for which it is designed. With that in mind, an algorithm for producing ontology-driven conceptual model abstractions was previously proposed. In this paper, we empirically evaluate the quality of the abstractions produced by it. First, we have implemented and tested the last version of the algorithm over a FAIR catalog of models represented in the ontology-driven conceptual modeling language OntoUML. Second, we performed three user studies to evaluate the usefulness of the resulting abstractions as perceived by modelers. This paper reports on the findings of these experiments and reflects on how they can be exploited to improve the existing algorithm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55184,"journal":{"name":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169023X24000661/pdfft?md5=3da15f24c92422d6dac0dc27c996166b&pid=1-s2.0-S0169023X24000661-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169023X24000661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complexity of an (ontology-driven) conceptual model highly correlates with the complexity of the domain and software for which it is designed. With that in mind, an algorithm for producing ontology-driven conceptual model abstractions was previously proposed. In this paper, we empirically evaluate the quality of the abstractions produced by it. First, we have implemented and tested the last version of the algorithm over a FAIR catalog of models represented in the ontology-driven conceptual modeling language OntoUML. Second, we performed three user studies to evaluate the usefulness of the resulting abstractions as perceived by modelers. This paper reports on the findings of these experiments and reflects on how they can be exploited to improve the existing algorithm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估本体驱动概念模型抽象的质量
本体驱动)概念模型的复杂性与设计该模型的领域和软件的复杂性密切相关。有鉴于此,我们之前提出了一种生成本体驱动概念模型抽象的算法。在本文中,我们对该算法生成的抽象的质量进行了实证评估。首先,我们在用本体驱动的概念模型语言 OntoUML 表示的模型 FAIR 目录上实现并测试了该算法的最后一个版本。其次,我们进行了三项用户研究,以评估建模者所感知的抽象结果的有用性。本文报告了这些实验的结果,并对如何利用这些结果改进现有算法进行了思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Data & Knowledge Engineering 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Data & Knowledge Engineering (DKE) stimulates the exchange of ideas and interaction between these two related fields of interest. DKE reaches a world-wide audience of researchers, designers, managers and users. The major aim of the journal is to identify, investigate and analyze the underlying principles in the design and effective use of these systems.
期刊最新文献
Reasoning on responsibilities for optimal process alignment computation SRank: Guiding schema selection in NoSQL document stores Relating behaviour of data-aware process models A framework for understanding event abstraction problem solving: Current states of event abstraction studies A conceptual framework for the government big data ecosystem (‘datagov.eco’)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1