Tobacco Control Policies and Sociodemographic Disparities in Cigarette Smoking Behaviors in the U.S.: A Systematic Review Protocol

{"title":"Tobacco Control Policies and Sociodemographic Disparities in Cigarette Smoking Behaviors in the U.S.: A Systematic Review Protocol","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement in the U.S., many studies have examined the associations between tobacco control policies and smoking; however, there is a need to comprehensively examine the impact of these policies on sociodemographic disparities in cigarette smoking. This protocol outlines a systematic review that seeks to fill this gap. Quantitative observational, experimental, and quasi-experimental studies are eligible for inclusion. Policies include cigarette taxes, smoke-free air laws, anti-tobacco media campaigns, and Tobacco 21 laws implemented in the U.S. Outcomes include cigarette smoking initiation, prevalence, and cessation among youth and adults. Sources to be searched include Clarivate BIOSIS, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Clarivate Web of Science Core Collection, and the National Bureau of Economic Research. Included studies must be written in English. Two independent reviewers will screen and analyze relevant articles and then extract data on participants, context, methods, and key findings. Studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists and presented in 2 reviews: 1 youth focused (aged &lt;18 years) and 1 adult focused (aged ≥18 years). The findings are intended to inform the creation of new and potentially more targeted tobacco control policies to improve health equity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000749/pdfft?md5=39110c5d6ca087f30a1d7761452db34e&pid=1-s2.0-S2773065424000749-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement in the U.S., many studies have examined the associations between tobacco control policies and smoking; however, there is a need to comprehensively examine the impact of these policies on sociodemographic disparities in cigarette smoking. This protocol outlines a systematic review that seeks to fill this gap. Quantitative observational, experimental, and quasi-experimental studies are eligible for inclusion. Policies include cigarette taxes, smoke-free air laws, anti-tobacco media campaigns, and Tobacco 21 laws implemented in the U.S. Outcomes include cigarette smoking initiation, prevalence, and cessation among youth and adults. Sources to be searched include Clarivate BIOSIS, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Clarivate Web of Science Core Collection, and the National Bureau of Economic Research. Included studies must be written in English. Two independent reviewers will screen and analyze relevant articles and then extract data on participants, context, methods, and key findings. Studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists and presented in 2 reviews: 1 youth focused (aged <18 years) and 1 adult focused (aged ≥18 years). The findings are intended to inform the creation of new and potentially more targeted tobacco control policies to improve health equity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国烟草控制政策与吸烟行为的社会人口差异:系统综述方案
自 1998 年美国签订《总体和解协议》以来,许多研究都对烟草控制政策与吸烟之间的关系进行了探讨;然而,有必要全面探讨这些政策对吸烟的社会人口差异的影响。本方案概述了一项旨在填补这一空白的系统性综述。定量观察性、实验性和准实验性研究均可纳入。政策包括卷烟税、无烟空气法、反烟草媒体宣传活动以及在美国实施的 "烟草 21 "法。结果包括青少年和成年人的卷烟吸烟率、吸烟率和戒烟率。检索来源包括 Clarivate BIOSIS、EBSCO CINAHL Plus、Cochrane Library、Ovid MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Sociological Abstracts、Clarivate Web of Science Core Collection 和美国国家经济研究局。纳入的研究必须用英语撰写。两名独立审稿人将对相关文章进行筛选和分析,然后提取有关参与者、背景、方法和主要发现的数据。研究将使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的批判性评估核对表进行评估,并以两篇综述的形式呈现:其中一篇关注青少年(18 岁),另一篇关注成人(≥18 岁)。研究结果旨在为制定新的、更有针对性的烟草控制政策提供信息,以提高健康公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board and Journal Information Work-Related Factors Associated With Psychological Distress Among Grocery Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lifestyle Differences in the Metabolic Comorbidity Score of Adult Population From South Asian Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study Corrigendum: Associations of Historical Redlining With BMI and Waist Circumference in Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Physicians’ Self-Reported Knowledge and Behaviors Related to Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain and Diagnosing Opioid Use Disorder, DocStyles, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1