Functional outcome of pertrochanteric fractures undergoing Dynamic Hip Screw versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation Techniques at a Tertiary care hospital of Karachi.

P. Hashmi, Wajahat Alam
{"title":"Functional outcome of pertrochanteric fractures undergoing Dynamic Hip Screw versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation Techniques at a Tertiary care hospital of Karachi.","authors":"P. Hashmi, Wajahat Alam","doi":"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.07.8159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To find out the functional outcomes as per Harris hip score (HHS) among patients of pertrochanteric fractures undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) at a Tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Non-randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Orthopedic Section, Department of Surgery, Agha Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Period: 1st August 2023 to 30th January 2023. Methods: A total of 40 patients of age 18 and older with confirmed pertrochanteric fractures were non-randomly allocated to ether fixation with DHS or PFNA. Intra-opeative blood loss and duration of surgery were recorded. The functional outcome assessment was assessed using HHS. Results: In a total of 40 patients, 31 (77.5%) were female. The mean age was 67.63±15.13 years (ranging between 23 to 89 years). The most common mechanism of fall was tipped over loose carpet, noted in 17 (42.5%) patients.  The mean intra-operative blood loss in DHS and PFNA groups were 73.75±20.06 ml, and 72.75±23.14 ml, respectively (p=0.885). The mean duration of surgery were 76.6±14.7 minutes, and 115.1±18.3 minutes in DHS and PFNA groups, respectively (p<0.001). Excellent, good, fair, poor, and failed outcomes were reported in 3 (7.5%), 17 (42.5%), 6 (15.0%), 10 (25.0%), and 4 (10.0%) patients respectively. When both groups were compared for outcomes, no statistically significant differences were observed (p=0.339). The mean HHS in DHS, and PFNA groups were 75.26±11.41, and 73.46±14.57, respectively (p=0.666). Conclusion: Functional outcomes as per HHS were relatively similar with DHS and PFNA approaches in patients with pertrochanteric fractures.","PeriodicalId":22991,"journal":{"name":"The professional medical journal","volume":"371 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The professional medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.07.8159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To find out the functional outcomes as per Harris hip score (HHS) among patients of pertrochanteric fractures undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) at a Tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Non-randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Orthopedic Section, Department of Surgery, Agha Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Period: 1st August 2023 to 30th January 2023. Methods: A total of 40 patients of age 18 and older with confirmed pertrochanteric fractures were non-randomly allocated to ether fixation with DHS or PFNA. Intra-opeative blood loss and duration of surgery were recorded. The functional outcome assessment was assessed using HHS. Results: In a total of 40 patients, 31 (77.5%) were female. The mean age was 67.63±15.13 years (ranging between 23 to 89 years). The most common mechanism of fall was tipped over loose carpet, noted in 17 (42.5%) patients.  The mean intra-operative blood loss in DHS and PFNA groups were 73.75±20.06 ml, and 72.75±23.14 ml, respectively (p=0.885). The mean duration of surgery were 76.6±14.7 minutes, and 115.1±18.3 minutes in DHS and PFNA groups, respectively (p<0.001). Excellent, good, fair, poor, and failed outcomes were reported in 3 (7.5%), 17 (42.5%), 6 (15.0%), 10 (25.0%), and 4 (10.0%) patients respectively. When both groups were compared for outcomes, no statistically significant differences were observed (p=0.339). The mean HHS in DHS, and PFNA groups were 75.26±11.41, and 73.46±14.57, respectively (p=0.666). Conclusion: Functional outcomes as per HHS were relatively similar with DHS and PFNA approaches in patients with pertrochanteric fractures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡拉奇一家三甲医院采用动态髋螺钉与股骨近端钉抗旋转技术治疗转子前端骨折的功能疗效。
目的根据哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS),了解在一家三级医院接受动态髋关节螺钉(DHS)与股骨近端钢钉抗旋转术(PFNA)治疗的转子前骨折患者的功能预后。研究设计:非随机对照试验。研究地点巴基斯坦卡拉奇阿加汗大学医院外科骨科。时间: 2023 年 8 月 1 日至 1 月 30 日2023 年 8 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 30 日。治疗方法对 40 名年龄在 18 岁及以上、确诊为转子前骨折的患者进行非随机分配,采用 DHS 或 PFNA 进行乙醚固定。记录术中失血量和手术时间。使用 HHS 对功能结果进行评估。结果在总共 40 名患者中,31 名(77.5%)为女性。平均年龄为(67.63±15.13)岁(23 至 89 岁不等)。最常见的跌倒原因是翻倒了松软的地毯,有 17 名患者(42.5%)发生了这种情况。 DHS 组和 PFNA 组的术中平均失血量分别为(73.75±20.06)毫升和(72.75±23.14)毫升(P=0.885)。DHS 组和 PFNA 组的平均手术时间分别为(76.6±14.7)分钟和(115.1±18.3)分钟(P<0.001)。优、良、一般、差和失败的患者分别有 3 例(7.5%)、17 例(42.5%)、6 例(15.0%)、10 例(25.0%)和 4 例(10.0%)。对两组患者的治疗结果进行比较后,未发现统计学上的显著差异(P=0.339)。DHS 组和 PFNA 组的平均 HHS 分别为(75.26±11.41)和(73.46±14.57)(P=0.666)。结论DHS和PFNA方法对转子前骨折患者的功能预后相对相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring protective potential of Vitamin E in mitigating liver steatosis in alcoholic liver injury. Comparison of the rate and indications of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida in a maternity hospital of Pakistan.q Clinical spectrum of acute flaccid paralysis among pediatric patients at the National Institute of Child Health, Karachi, Pakistan. Frequency and involvement of lymph nodes in squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity in cross sectional population. Frequency of fistula in patients operated for primary cleft palate repair in a tertiary care center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1