Evaluation of cardiac output in neonatal sepsis

Angana Bhattacharjee, Saugata Chaudhuri, Maitreyi Basu
{"title":"Evaluation of cardiac output in neonatal sepsis","authors":"Angana Bhattacharjee, Saugata Chaudhuri, Maitreyi Basu","doi":"10.3126/ajms.v15i7.65989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neonatal sepsis is a clinical syndrome characterized by signs and symptoms of infection with or without accompanying bacteremia in the 1st month of life imposing significant cardiovascular compromise which poses a huge burden of morbidity. The essential objective of functional neonatal echocardiography is to recognize features of cardiovascular compromise earlier and help in timely institution of management. This study provides an overview regarding the variability of cardiac output (CO) in neonates with culture-positive sepsis.\nAims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to assess the variability of CO in term neonates with Gram-positive sepsis and Gram-negative sepsis.\nMaterials and Methods: The observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics for 18 months in a tertiary care center. 2D echocardiography was performed on all the neonates who came positive for sepsis screen within the first 2 days of institution of antibiotics. CO was calculated from the echocardiographic finding of Aortic Root Diameter (d), Velocity Time Integral, and Heart Rate recorded at the same time. Normal range of left ventricular output has been defined as 150–300 mL/kg/min each.\nResults: In Gram-negative group, the mean CO (Mean±SD) of patients was 386.4545±34.2284 mL/kg/min while in Gram-positive group, the mean CO (Mean±SD) of patients was 345.1532±37.6044 mL/kg/min and the variation stands significant at P<0.0001.\nConclusion: This research confers about hyperdynamic circulatory status of neonatal sepsis as reflected by increased CO beyond the normal limit in septic neonates. On comparison, a strikingly higher CO was observed in Gram-negative sepsis group than Gram-positive group.","PeriodicalId":8522,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i7.65989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal sepsis is a clinical syndrome characterized by signs and symptoms of infection with or without accompanying bacteremia in the 1st month of life imposing significant cardiovascular compromise which poses a huge burden of morbidity. The essential objective of functional neonatal echocardiography is to recognize features of cardiovascular compromise earlier and help in timely institution of management. This study provides an overview regarding the variability of cardiac output (CO) in neonates with culture-positive sepsis. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to assess the variability of CO in term neonates with Gram-positive sepsis and Gram-negative sepsis. Materials and Methods: The observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics for 18 months in a tertiary care center. 2D echocardiography was performed on all the neonates who came positive for sepsis screen within the first 2 days of institution of antibiotics. CO was calculated from the echocardiographic finding of Aortic Root Diameter (d), Velocity Time Integral, and Heart Rate recorded at the same time. Normal range of left ventricular output has been defined as 150–300 mL/kg/min each. Results: In Gram-negative group, the mean CO (Mean±SD) of patients was 386.4545±34.2284 mL/kg/min while in Gram-positive group, the mean CO (Mean±SD) of patients was 345.1532±37.6044 mL/kg/min and the variation stands significant at P<0.0001. Conclusion: This research confers about hyperdynamic circulatory status of neonatal sepsis as reflected by increased CO beyond the normal limit in septic neonates. On comparison, a strikingly higher CO was observed in Gram-negative sepsis group than Gram-positive group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估新生儿败血症的心输出量
背景:新生儿败血症是一种临床综合征,其特点是出生后一个月内出现感染症状和体征,伴有或不伴有菌血症,造成心血管严重受损,给发病率带来巨大负担。新生儿功能性超声心动图的主要目的是及早识别心血管受损的特征,并帮助及时采取治疗措施。本研究概述了培养阳性败血症新生儿心输出量(CO)的变化情况:本研究的目的和目标是评估患有革兰氏阳性败血症和革兰氏阴性败血症的足月新生儿的 CO 变异性:这项观察性横断面研究在一家三级医疗中心的儿科进行,为期 18 个月。在使用抗生素的头两天内,对所有败血症筛查呈阳性的新生儿进行了二维超声心动图检查。CO是根据同时记录的主动脉根部直径(d)、速度时间积分和心率的超声心动图结果计算得出的。左心室输出量的正常范围定义为150-300 mL/kg/min:结果:革兰氏阴性组患者的平均 CO(Mean±SD)为 386.4545±34.2284 mL/kg/min,而革兰氏阳性组患者的平均 CO(Mean±SD)为 345.1532±37.6044 mL/kg/min,差异显著,P<0.0001:这项研究证实了新生儿脓毒症的高动力循环状态,脓毒症新生儿的 CO 升高超过了正常值。相比之下,革兰氏阴性败血症组的 CO 明显高于革兰氏阳性组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine with perineural dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgery Efficacy and safety of low-dose celecoxib with chemoradiation in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma Comparison between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intra renal surgery for the management of lower calyceal calculi of size less than 1.5 cm : Our institutional experience A study on clinicoradiological profile of patients with hydropneumothorax in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India Role of low-dose deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin alone for medical expulsive therapy of ureteric stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1