ARE ALARM BELLS RINGING IN ACADEMIA? CHATGPT AS A SAMPLE OF USING CHATBOTS IN EDUCATION

IF 17.7 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.17718/tojde.1353737

Gürhan Durak, Serkan Cankaya

{"title":"ARE ALARM BELLS RINGING IN ACADEMIA? CHATGPT AS A SAMPLE OF USING CHATBOTS IN EDUCATION","authors":"Gürhan Durak, Serkan Cankaya","doi":"10.17718/tojde.1353737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this mixed methods study is to determine the evaluations made by academics on an academic text generated with ChatGPT and get their general views on ChatGPT. The convergent parallel design is utilized where the qualitative and quantitative methods are combined to produce triangulated results. Data were collected via an online form from 45 academics. Academics were asked to read and rate the sample text generated by ChatGPT. The titles “Writing rules,” “Language and expression,” and “Subject integrity” of the text generated by ChatGPT received the highest ratings from the academics. The qualitative findings obtained were interpreted within the framework of the “Diffusion of Innovations” and “Uses and Gratifications” theories, and the related themes were formed. As a result, the participants were asked about their feelings about using ChatGPT, and the themes of astonishment, pessimism, anxiety, and hopefulness emerged. Participants were asked their opinions about the benefits and negative aspects of using ChatGPT. Themes emerged under the benefits, and negative aspects titles were evaluated. Finally, the other themes that emerged under the satisfaction with ChatGPT and making ChatGPT widespread titles were assessed.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1353737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of this mixed methods study is to determine the evaluations made by academics on an academic text generated with ChatGPT and get their general views on ChatGPT. The convergent parallel design is utilized where the qualitative and quantitative methods are combined to produce triangulated results. Data were collected via an online form from 45 academics. Academics were asked to read and rate the sample text generated by ChatGPT. The titles “Writing rules,” “Language and expression,” and “Subject integrity” of the text generated by ChatGPT received the highest ratings from the academics. The qualitative findings obtained were interpreted within the framework of the “Diffusion of Innovations” and “Uses and Gratifications” theories, and the related themes were formed. As a result, the participants were asked about their feelings about using ChatGPT, and the themes of astonishment, pessimism, anxiety, and hopefulness emerged. Participants were asked their opinions about the benefits and negative aspects of using ChatGPT. Themes emerged under the benefits, and negative aspects titles were evaluated. Finally, the other themes that emerged under the satisfaction with ChatGPT and making ChatGPT widespread titles were assessed.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

学术界的警钟是否已经敲响？作为在教育领域使用聊天机器人的一个示例，chatgpt

这项混合方法研究的主要目的是确定学者们对使用 ChatGPT 生成的学术文本的评价，并了解他们对 ChatGPT 的总体看法。研究采用收敛平行设计，将定性和定量方法结合起来，得出三角测量结果。我们通过在线表格收集了 45 位学者的数据。学者们被要求阅读 ChatGPT 生成的样本文本并进行评分。由 ChatGPT 生成的文本的标题 "写作规则"、"语言与表达 "和 "主题完整性 "获得了学者们的最高评分。我们在 "创新扩散 "和 "使用与收益 "理论的框架下对定性研究结果进行了解释，并形成了相关主题。结果，参与者被问及使用 ChatGPT 的感受，并出现了惊讶、悲观、焦虑和希望等主题。参与者被问及对使用 ChatGPT 的好处和负面影响的看法。在益处和消极方面的标题下出现了一些主题，并对这些主题进行了评估。最后，评估了在 "对 ChatGPT 的满意度 "和 "普及 ChatGPT "标题下出现的其他主题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.